A cloth design system by intuitive operations supporting mouse device besides phantom device and its user evaluation

Katsunori Miyahara, Yoshihiro Okada

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors have already proposed a cloth design system that provides intuitive operations, e.g., sewing, cutting and fitting a cloth in a virtual 3D space through direct manipulations using a force-feedback device, Phantom. However, a Phantom device is very expensive and it is difficult for the end user to buy and use it. Also, many users are familiar with the use of a mouse device rather than that of a Phantom device. So, the authors extended their cloth design system to support a standard mouse device besides a Phantom device. They also evaluated the usefulness of their cloth design system by asking some subjects to try to practically perform several operations using a Phantom device and a mouse device. Then it is found that even using a mouse device, their cloth design system is practically useful. This paper shows evaluation results and discusses about them, and clarifies the usefulness of the cloth design system that only supports a mouse device.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation
Subtitle of host publicationNew Advances, CGIV 2007
Pages154-159
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2007
EventComputer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation: New Advances, CGIV 2007 - Bangkok, Thailand
Duration: Aug 13 2007Aug 16 2007

Publication series

NameComputer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation: New Advances, CGIV 2007

Other

OtherComputer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation: New Advances, CGIV 2007
CountryThailand
CityBangkok
Period8/13/078/16/07

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A cloth design system by intuitive operations supporting mouse device besides phantom device and its user evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this