Abstract
The M s 7.0 Lushan earthquake triggered a huge number of landslides. Landslide susceptibility mapping is of great importance. Weight of Evidence (WoE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods have been widely used for LSM (Landslide Susceptibility Mapping). However, limitations still exist. WoE is capable of assessing the influence of different classes of each factor, but neglects the correlation between factors. LR is able to analyze the relationship among the factors while it is not capable of evaluating the influence of different classes. This paper proposes a combined method of LR and WoE for LSM, taking advantage of their individual merits and overcoming their limitations. An inventory of 1289 landslides was used: 70% were random-selected for training and the remaining for validation. 11 landslide condition factors were employed in the model and the result was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that the LR-WoE model had a better accuracy than the LR model, producing an area below the curve with values of 0.802 success and 0.791 predictive, higher than that of the LR model (0.715 success and 0.722 predictive). It is therefore concluded that the combined method of WoE and LR can provide a promising level of accuracy for earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility mapping.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 511-524 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Acta Geologica Sinica |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1 2016 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geology
Cite this
A Combined Weight of Evidence and Logistic Regression Method for Susceptibility Mapping of Earthquake-induced Landslides : A Case Study of the April 20, 2013 Lushan Earthquake, China. / Zhou, Suhua; Wang, Wei; Chen, Guangqi; Liu, Baochen; Fang, Ligang.
In: Acta Geologica Sinica, Vol. 90, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 511-524.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Combined Weight of Evidence and Logistic Regression Method for Susceptibility Mapping of Earthquake-induced Landslides
T2 - A Case Study of the April 20, 2013 Lushan Earthquake, China
AU - Zhou, Suhua
AU - Wang, Wei
AU - Chen, Guangqi
AU - Liu, Baochen
AU - Fang, Ligang
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - The M s 7.0 Lushan earthquake triggered a huge number of landslides. Landslide susceptibility mapping is of great importance. Weight of Evidence (WoE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods have been widely used for LSM (Landslide Susceptibility Mapping). However, limitations still exist. WoE is capable of assessing the influence of different classes of each factor, but neglects the correlation between factors. LR is able to analyze the relationship among the factors while it is not capable of evaluating the influence of different classes. This paper proposes a combined method of LR and WoE for LSM, taking advantage of their individual merits and overcoming their limitations. An inventory of 1289 landslides was used: 70% were random-selected for training and the remaining for validation. 11 landslide condition factors were employed in the model and the result was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that the LR-WoE model had a better accuracy than the LR model, producing an area below the curve with values of 0.802 success and 0.791 predictive, higher than that of the LR model (0.715 success and 0.722 predictive). It is therefore concluded that the combined method of WoE and LR can provide a promising level of accuracy for earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility mapping.
AB - The M s 7.0 Lushan earthquake triggered a huge number of landslides. Landslide susceptibility mapping is of great importance. Weight of Evidence (WoE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods have been widely used for LSM (Landslide Susceptibility Mapping). However, limitations still exist. WoE is capable of assessing the influence of different classes of each factor, but neglects the correlation between factors. LR is able to analyze the relationship among the factors while it is not capable of evaluating the influence of different classes. This paper proposes a combined method of LR and WoE for LSM, taking advantage of their individual merits and overcoming their limitations. An inventory of 1289 landslides was used: 70% were random-selected for training and the remaining for validation. 11 landslide condition factors were employed in the model and the result was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that the LR-WoE model had a better accuracy than the LR model, producing an area below the curve with values of 0.802 success and 0.791 predictive, higher than that of the LR model (0.715 success and 0.722 predictive). It is therefore concluded that the combined method of WoE and LR can provide a promising level of accuracy for earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility mapping.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964310795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964310795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1755-6724.12687
DO - 10.1111/1755-6724.12687
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84964310795
VL - 90
SP - 511
EP - 524
JO - Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition)
JF - Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition)
SN - 0001-5717
IS - 2
ER -