A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles

Michelle H. Downey, Rebecca Searle, Sunil Bellur, Adam Geiger, Brian S. Maitner, Johanna R. Ohm, Midori Tuda, Tom E.X. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the selective forces that shape dispersal strategies is a fundamental goal of evolutionary ecology and is increasingly important in changing, human-altered environments. Sex-biased dispersal (SBD) is common in dioecious taxa, and understanding variation in the direction and magnitude of SBD across taxa has been a persistent challenge. We took a comparative, laboratory-based approach using 16 groups (species or strains) of bean beetles (genera Acanthoscelides, Callosobruchus, and Zabrotes, including 10 strains of one species) to test two predictions that emerge from dominant hypotheses for the evolution of SBD: (1) groups that suffer greater costs of inbreeding should exhibit greater SBD in favor of either sex (inbreeding avoidance hypothesis) and (2) groups with stronger local mate competition should exhibit greater male bias in dispersal (kin competition avoidance hypothesis). We used laboratory experiments to quantify SBD in crawling dispersal, the fitness effects of inbreeding, and the degree of polygyny (number of female mates per male), a proxy for local mate competition. While we found that both polygyny and male-biased dispersal were common across bean beetle groups, consistent with the kin competition avoidance hypothesis, quantitative relationships between trait values did not support the predictions. Across groups, there was no significant association between SBD and effects of inbreeding nor SBD and degree of polygyny, using either raw values or phylogenetically independent contrasts. We discuss possible limitations of our experimental approach for detecting the predicted relationships, as well as reasons why single-factor hypotheses may be too simplistic to explain the evolution of SBD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4819-4828
Number of pages10
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume5
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Bruchidae
hypothesis testing
beetle
gender
inbreeding
polygyny
testing
Zabrotes
Acanthoscelides
Callosobruchus
prediction
inbreeding avoidance
ecology
fitness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Downey, M. H., Searle, R., Bellur, S., Geiger, A., Maitner, B. S., Ohm, J. R., ... Miller, T. E. X. (2015). A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles. Ecology and Evolution, 5(21), 4819-4828. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1753

A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles. / Downey, Michelle H.; Searle, Rebecca; Bellur, Sunil; Geiger, Adam; Maitner, Brian S.; Ohm, Johanna R.; Tuda, Midori; Miller, Tom E.X.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 5, No. 21, 11.2015, p. 4819-4828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Downey, MH, Searle, R, Bellur, S, Geiger, A, Maitner, BS, Ohm, JR, Tuda, M & Miller, TEX 2015, 'A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles', Ecology and Evolution, vol. 5, no. 21, pp. 4819-4828. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1753
Downey, Michelle H. ; Searle, Rebecca ; Bellur, Sunil ; Geiger, Adam ; Maitner, Brian S. ; Ohm, Johanna R. ; Tuda, Midori ; Miller, Tom E.X. / A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 21. pp. 4819-4828.
@article{8ce805dece19448e83b08a87a2ed4d79,
title = "A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles",
abstract = "Understanding the selective forces that shape dispersal strategies is a fundamental goal of evolutionary ecology and is increasingly important in changing, human-altered environments. Sex-biased dispersal (SBD) is common in dioecious taxa, and understanding variation in the direction and magnitude of SBD across taxa has been a persistent challenge. We took a comparative, laboratory-based approach using 16 groups (species or strains) of bean beetles (genera Acanthoscelides, Callosobruchus, and Zabrotes, including 10 strains of one species) to test two predictions that emerge from dominant hypotheses for the evolution of SBD: (1) groups that suffer greater costs of inbreeding should exhibit greater SBD in favor of either sex (inbreeding avoidance hypothesis) and (2) groups with stronger local mate competition should exhibit greater male bias in dispersal (kin competition avoidance hypothesis). We used laboratory experiments to quantify SBD in crawling dispersal, the fitness effects of inbreeding, and the degree of polygyny (number of female mates per male), a proxy for local mate competition. While we found that both polygyny and male-biased dispersal were common across bean beetle groups, consistent with the kin competition avoidance hypothesis, quantitative relationships between trait values did not support the predictions. Across groups, there was no significant association between SBD and effects of inbreeding nor SBD and degree of polygyny, using either raw values or phylogenetically independent contrasts. We discuss possible limitations of our experimental approach for detecting the predicted relationships, as well as reasons why single-factor hypotheses may be too simplistic to explain the evolution of SBD.",
author = "Downey, {Michelle H.} and Rebecca Searle and Sunil Bellur and Adam Geiger and Maitner, {Brian S.} and Ohm, {Johanna R.} and Midori Tuda and Miller, {Tom E.X.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.1753",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "4819--4828",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles

AU - Downey, Michelle H.

AU - Searle, Rebecca

AU - Bellur, Sunil

AU - Geiger, Adam

AU - Maitner, Brian S.

AU - Ohm, Johanna R.

AU - Tuda, Midori

AU - Miller, Tom E.X.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Understanding the selective forces that shape dispersal strategies is a fundamental goal of evolutionary ecology and is increasingly important in changing, human-altered environments. Sex-biased dispersal (SBD) is common in dioecious taxa, and understanding variation in the direction and magnitude of SBD across taxa has been a persistent challenge. We took a comparative, laboratory-based approach using 16 groups (species or strains) of bean beetles (genera Acanthoscelides, Callosobruchus, and Zabrotes, including 10 strains of one species) to test two predictions that emerge from dominant hypotheses for the evolution of SBD: (1) groups that suffer greater costs of inbreeding should exhibit greater SBD in favor of either sex (inbreeding avoidance hypothesis) and (2) groups with stronger local mate competition should exhibit greater male bias in dispersal (kin competition avoidance hypothesis). We used laboratory experiments to quantify SBD in crawling dispersal, the fitness effects of inbreeding, and the degree of polygyny (number of female mates per male), a proxy for local mate competition. While we found that both polygyny and male-biased dispersal were common across bean beetle groups, consistent with the kin competition avoidance hypothesis, quantitative relationships between trait values did not support the predictions. Across groups, there was no significant association between SBD and effects of inbreeding nor SBD and degree of polygyny, using either raw values or phylogenetically independent contrasts. We discuss possible limitations of our experimental approach for detecting the predicted relationships, as well as reasons why single-factor hypotheses may be too simplistic to explain the evolution of SBD.

AB - Understanding the selective forces that shape dispersal strategies is a fundamental goal of evolutionary ecology and is increasingly important in changing, human-altered environments. Sex-biased dispersal (SBD) is common in dioecious taxa, and understanding variation in the direction and magnitude of SBD across taxa has been a persistent challenge. We took a comparative, laboratory-based approach using 16 groups (species or strains) of bean beetles (genera Acanthoscelides, Callosobruchus, and Zabrotes, including 10 strains of one species) to test two predictions that emerge from dominant hypotheses for the evolution of SBD: (1) groups that suffer greater costs of inbreeding should exhibit greater SBD in favor of either sex (inbreeding avoidance hypothesis) and (2) groups with stronger local mate competition should exhibit greater male bias in dispersal (kin competition avoidance hypothesis). We used laboratory experiments to quantify SBD in crawling dispersal, the fitness effects of inbreeding, and the degree of polygyny (number of female mates per male), a proxy for local mate competition. While we found that both polygyny and male-biased dispersal were common across bean beetle groups, consistent with the kin competition avoidance hypothesis, quantitative relationships between trait values did not support the predictions. Across groups, there was no significant association between SBD and effects of inbreeding nor SBD and degree of polygyny, using either raw values or phylogenetically independent contrasts. We discuss possible limitations of our experimental approach for detecting the predicted relationships, as well as reasons why single-factor hypotheses may be too simplistic to explain the evolution of SBD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946486165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946486165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.1753

DO - 10.1002/ece3.1753

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84946486165

VL - 5

SP - 4819

EP - 4828

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 21

ER -