A comparative study of cardiac preservation with Celsior or University of Wisconsin solution with or without prior administration of cardioplegia

Noriko Boku, Yoshihisa Tanoue, Noriyoshi Kajihara, Masataka Eto, Munetaka Masuda, Shigeki Morita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We have previously reported the cardiac functional and metabolic benefits of administration of extracellular-type cardioplegia before preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Celsior solution was designed to be used both as an arresting solution and a storage solution for heart transplantation. The objective of the present study is to compare cardiac function of hearts arrested and preserved with Celsior solution to hearts arrested with cardioplegia followed by preservation with UW solution. Methods: Rabbit hearts were divided into 4 groups: in the Celsior group, hearts were arrested and preserved with Celsior solution; in the C-Celsior group, hearts were arrested by an extracellular-type cardioplegia and preserved with Celsior solution; in the UW group, hearts were arrested and stored in University of Wisconsin solution; and, in the C-UW group, hearts were arrested with extracellular-type cardioplegia and stored in University of Wisconsin solution. After 6 hours of preservation, cardiac function was measured using modified Frank-Starling curves in the isolated blood-perfused working heart. Results: Cardiac function in the Celsior group was inferior to that in both the C-UW group and UW group. The C-Celsior group demonstrated inferior cardiac function compared with the Celsior group (p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the C-UW and UW groups. Conclusions: Celsior solution did not surpass UW solution regardless of the use of cardioplegia. Further studies are required to develop optimal solution for use as both an arresting solution and a storage solution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-225
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Induced Heart Arrest
Celsior
Starlings
Heart Transplantation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Cite this

A comparative study of cardiac preservation with Celsior or University of Wisconsin solution with or without prior administration of cardioplegia. / Boku, Noriko; Tanoue, Yoshihisa; Kajihara, Noriyoshi; Eto, Masataka; Masuda, Munetaka; Morita, Shigeki.

In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 219-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1867eebac7334f148d0aef313799d0d1,
title = "A comparative study of cardiac preservation with Celsior or University of Wisconsin solution with or without prior administration of cardioplegia",
abstract = "Background: We have previously reported the cardiac functional and metabolic benefits of administration of extracellular-type cardioplegia before preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Celsior solution was designed to be used both as an arresting solution and a storage solution for heart transplantation. The objective of the present study is to compare cardiac function of hearts arrested and preserved with Celsior solution to hearts arrested with cardioplegia followed by preservation with UW solution. Methods: Rabbit hearts were divided into 4 groups: in the Celsior group, hearts were arrested and preserved with Celsior solution; in the C-Celsior group, hearts were arrested by an extracellular-type cardioplegia and preserved with Celsior solution; in the UW group, hearts were arrested and stored in University of Wisconsin solution; and, in the C-UW group, hearts were arrested with extracellular-type cardioplegia and stored in University of Wisconsin solution. After 6 hours of preservation, cardiac function was measured using modified Frank-Starling curves in the isolated blood-perfused working heart. Results: Cardiac function in the Celsior group was inferior to that in both the C-UW group and UW group. The C-Celsior group demonstrated inferior cardiac function compared with the Celsior group (p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the C-UW and UW groups. Conclusions: Celsior solution did not surpass UW solution regardless of the use of cardioplegia. Further studies are required to develop optimal solution for use as both an arresting solution and a storage solution.",
author = "Noriko Boku and Yoshihisa Tanoue and Noriyoshi Kajihara and Masataka Eto and Munetaka Masuda and Shigeki Morita",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healun.2005.08.009",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "219--225",
journal = "Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation",
issn = "1053-2498",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of cardiac preservation with Celsior or University of Wisconsin solution with or without prior administration of cardioplegia

AU - Boku, Noriko

AU - Tanoue, Yoshihisa

AU - Kajihara, Noriyoshi

AU - Eto, Masataka

AU - Masuda, Munetaka

AU - Morita, Shigeki

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - Background: We have previously reported the cardiac functional and metabolic benefits of administration of extracellular-type cardioplegia before preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Celsior solution was designed to be used both as an arresting solution and a storage solution for heart transplantation. The objective of the present study is to compare cardiac function of hearts arrested and preserved with Celsior solution to hearts arrested with cardioplegia followed by preservation with UW solution. Methods: Rabbit hearts were divided into 4 groups: in the Celsior group, hearts were arrested and preserved with Celsior solution; in the C-Celsior group, hearts were arrested by an extracellular-type cardioplegia and preserved with Celsior solution; in the UW group, hearts were arrested and stored in University of Wisconsin solution; and, in the C-UW group, hearts were arrested with extracellular-type cardioplegia and stored in University of Wisconsin solution. After 6 hours of preservation, cardiac function was measured using modified Frank-Starling curves in the isolated blood-perfused working heart. Results: Cardiac function in the Celsior group was inferior to that in both the C-UW group and UW group. The C-Celsior group demonstrated inferior cardiac function compared with the Celsior group (p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the C-UW and UW groups. Conclusions: Celsior solution did not surpass UW solution regardless of the use of cardioplegia. Further studies are required to develop optimal solution for use as both an arresting solution and a storage solution.

AB - Background: We have previously reported the cardiac functional and metabolic benefits of administration of extracellular-type cardioplegia before preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Celsior solution was designed to be used both as an arresting solution and a storage solution for heart transplantation. The objective of the present study is to compare cardiac function of hearts arrested and preserved with Celsior solution to hearts arrested with cardioplegia followed by preservation with UW solution. Methods: Rabbit hearts were divided into 4 groups: in the Celsior group, hearts were arrested and preserved with Celsior solution; in the C-Celsior group, hearts were arrested by an extracellular-type cardioplegia and preserved with Celsior solution; in the UW group, hearts were arrested and stored in University of Wisconsin solution; and, in the C-UW group, hearts were arrested with extracellular-type cardioplegia and stored in University of Wisconsin solution. After 6 hours of preservation, cardiac function was measured using modified Frank-Starling curves in the isolated blood-perfused working heart. Results: Cardiac function in the Celsior group was inferior to that in both the C-UW group and UW group. The C-Celsior group demonstrated inferior cardiac function compared with the Celsior group (p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the C-UW and UW groups. Conclusions: Celsior solution did not surpass UW solution regardless of the use of cardioplegia. Further studies are required to develop optimal solution for use as both an arresting solution and a storage solution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31544478247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31544478247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2005.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2005.08.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 16446224

AN - SCOPUS:31544478247

VL - 25

SP - 219

EP - 225

JO - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

JF - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

SN - 1053-2498

IS - 2

ER -