TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of the peri-implant bone stress generated by the preload with screw tightening between ‘bonded’ and ‘contact’ model
AU - Matsuzaki, Maki
AU - Ayukawa, Yasunori
AU - Sakai, Nobuo
AU - Matsuzaki, Tatsuya
AU - Matsushita, Yasuyuki
AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 23592855] to Y.M.
PY - 2017/3/12
Y1 - 2017/3/12
N2 - A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.
AB - A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988932503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988932503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10255842.2016.1236370
DO - 10.1080/10255842.2016.1236370
M3 - Article
C2 - 27677347
AN - SCOPUS:84988932503
SN - 1025-5842
VL - 20
SP - 393
EP - 402
JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
IS - 4
ER -