A comparison of the peri-implant bone stress generated by the preload with screw tightening between ‘bonded’ and ‘contact’ model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-402
Number of pages10
JournalComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 12 2017

Fingerprint

Bone
Dental prostheses
Stress concentration
Friction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{d338135fb2fd43efa4fd35f5d703d8fd,
title = "A comparison of the peri-implant bone stress generated by the preload with screw tightening between ‘bonded’ and ‘contact’ model",
abstract = "A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.",
author = "Maki Matsuzaki and Yasunori Ayukawa and Nobuo Sakai and Tatsuya Matsuzaki and Yasuyuki Matsushita and Kiyoshi Koyano",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/10255842.2016.1236370",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "393--402",
journal = "Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "1025-5842",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the peri-implant bone stress generated by the preload with screw tightening between ‘bonded’ and ‘contact’ model

AU - Matsuzaki, Maki

AU - Ayukawa, Yasunori

AU - Sakai, Nobuo

AU - Matsuzaki, Tatsuya

AU - Matsushita, Yasuyuki

AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi

PY - 2017/3/12

Y1 - 2017/3/12

N2 - A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.

AB - A number of finite element analyses (FEAs) for the dental implant were performed without regard for preload and with all interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’. The purpose of this study was comparing the stress distributions between the conventional FEA model with all contacting interfaces ‘fixed-bonded’ (bonded model) and the model with the interfaces of the components in ‘contact’ with friction simulated as a preloaded implant (contact model). We further verified the accuracy of the result of the FEA using model experiment. In the contact model, the stress was more widely distributed than in the bonded model. From the model study, the preload induced by screw tightening generated strain at the peri-implant bone, even before the application of external force. As a result, the bonded model could not reproduce the mechanical phenomena, whereas the contact model is considered to be appropriate for analysing mechanical problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988932503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988932503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10255842.2016.1236370

DO - 10.1080/10255842.2016.1236370

M3 - Article

C2 - 27677347

AN - SCOPUS:84988932503

VL - 20

SP - 393

EP - 402

JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

SN - 1025-5842

IS - 4

ER -