A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers

Koichi Yamashita, Tomoki Nishiyama, Takeshi Yokoyama, Hidehiro Abe, Masanobu Manabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers are considered to prevent nosocomial pneumonia in hospital wards. However, their usefulness in intensive care units (ICUs) has not yet been established. In this study, we evaluated and compared contamination in prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and that in reusable oxygen humidifiers. Methods: Six oxygen outlets in the ICU were used. Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and reusable oxygen humidifiers were attached to each wall-mounted oxygen outlet using a 2-way connector. Nonsterile nasal cannulae and tubes were connected to the humidifiers through which 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered continuously. Water samples (5 mL) from each humidifier were collected on the first day and every 7 days thereafter for a period of 56 days. Each water sample was incubated aerobically at 35°C for 48 hours and observed daily for bacterial growth. Results: Bacterial growth was observed only once in one sample from each humidifier type. Gram-positive cocci, 40 colony-forming units in the disposable oxygen humidifier and 10 colony-forming units in the reusable oxygen humidifier, were detected. Dust was observed from the 35th day onward only in the reusable oxygen humidifier. Conclusion: In the ICU, bacterial contamination does not occur in oxygen humidifiers even after 56 days of continuous use. However, dust does accumulate in the reusable oxygen humidifier after 35 days of continuous use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-175
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxygen
Intensive Care Units
Dust
Prefil
Humidifiers
Stem Cells
Gram-Positive Cocci
Water
Growth
Pneumonia

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers. / Yamashita, Koichi; Nishiyama, Tomoki; Yokoyama, Takeshi; Abe, Hidehiro; Manabe, Masanobu.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.06.2005, p. 172-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamashita, Koichi ; Nishiyama, Tomoki ; Yokoyama, Takeshi ; Abe, Hidehiro ; Manabe, Masanobu. / A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2005 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 172-175.
@article{9f54b0907d184d528c4cbff71c4fd971,
title = "A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers",
abstract = "Background: Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers are considered to prevent nosocomial pneumonia in hospital wards. However, their usefulness in intensive care units (ICUs) has not yet been established. In this study, we evaluated and compared contamination in prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and that in reusable oxygen humidifiers. Methods: Six oxygen outlets in the ICU were used. Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and reusable oxygen humidifiers were attached to each wall-mounted oxygen outlet using a 2-way connector. Nonsterile nasal cannulae and tubes were connected to the humidifiers through which 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered continuously. Water samples (5 mL) from each humidifier were collected on the first day and every 7 days thereafter for a period of 56 days. Each water sample was incubated aerobically at 35°C for 48 hours and observed daily for bacterial growth. Results: Bacterial growth was observed only once in one sample from each humidifier type. Gram-positive cocci, 40 colony-forming units in the disposable oxygen humidifier and 10 colony-forming units in the reusable oxygen humidifier, were detected. Dust was observed from the 35th day onward only in the reusable oxygen humidifier. Conclusion: In the ICU, bacterial contamination does not occur in oxygen humidifiers even after 56 days of continuous use. However, dust does accumulate in the reusable oxygen humidifier after 35 days of continuous use.",
author = "Koichi Yamashita and Tomoki Nishiyama and Takeshi Yokoyama and Hidehiro Abe and Masanobu Manabe",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "172--175",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers

AU - Yamashita, Koichi

AU - Nishiyama, Tomoki

AU - Yokoyama, Takeshi

AU - Abe, Hidehiro

AU - Manabe, Masanobu

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - Background: Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers are considered to prevent nosocomial pneumonia in hospital wards. However, their usefulness in intensive care units (ICUs) has not yet been established. In this study, we evaluated and compared contamination in prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and that in reusable oxygen humidifiers. Methods: Six oxygen outlets in the ICU were used. Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and reusable oxygen humidifiers were attached to each wall-mounted oxygen outlet using a 2-way connector. Nonsterile nasal cannulae and tubes were connected to the humidifiers through which 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered continuously. Water samples (5 mL) from each humidifier were collected on the first day and every 7 days thereafter for a period of 56 days. Each water sample was incubated aerobically at 35°C for 48 hours and observed daily for bacterial growth. Results: Bacterial growth was observed only once in one sample from each humidifier type. Gram-positive cocci, 40 colony-forming units in the disposable oxygen humidifier and 10 colony-forming units in the reusable oxygen humidifier, were detected. Dust was observed from the 35th day onward only in the reusable oxygen humidifier. Conclusion: In the ICU, bacterial contamination does not occur in oxygen humidifiers even after 56 days of continuous use. However, dust does accumulate in the reusable oxygen humidifier after 35 days of continuous use.

AB - Background: Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers are considered to prevent nosocomial pneumonia in hospital wards. However, their usefulness in intensive care units (ICUs) has not yet been established. In this study, we evaluated and compared contamination in prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and that in reusable oxygen humidifiers. Methods: Six oxygen outlets in the ICU were used. Prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers and reusable oxygen humidifiers were attached to each wall-mounted oxygen outlet using a 2-way connector. Nonsterile nasal cannulae and tubes were connected to the humidifiers through which 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered continuously. Water samples (5 mL) from each humidifier were collected on the first day and every 7 days thereafter for a period of 56 days. Each water sample was incubated aerobically at 35°C for 48 hours and observed daily for bacterial growth. Results: Bacterial growth was observed only once in one sample from each humidifier type. Gram-positive cocci, 40 colony-forming units in the disposable oxygen humidifier and 10 colony-forming units in the reusable oxygen humidifier, were detected. Dust was observed from the 35th day onward only in the reusable oxygen humidifier. Conclusion: In the ICU, bacterial contamination does not occur in oxygen humidifiers even after 56 days of continuous use. However, dust does accumulate in the reusable oxygen humidifier after 35 days of continuous use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24044458195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24044458195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.01.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 16139158

AN - SCOPUS:24044458195

VL - 20

SP - 172

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 2

ER -