A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society

Takuo Kuboki, Tetsuo Ichikawa, Kazuyoshi Baba, Masanori Fujisawa, Hironobu Sato, Hideki Aita, Shigeto Koyama, Masayuki Hideshima, Yuji Sato, Hiroyuki Wake, Aya Kimura-Ono, Kan Nagao, Yorika Kodaira-Ueda, Katsushi Tamaki, Shinsuke Sadamori, Kazuhiro Tsuga, Yasuhiro Nishi, Takashi Sawase, Hisashi Koshino, Shin ichi MasumiKaoru Sakurai, Kanji Ishibashi, Takashi Ohyama, Yasumasa Akagawa, Toshihiro Hirai, Keiichi Sasaki, Kiyoshi Koyano, Hirofumi Yatani, Hideo Matsumura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The Japan Prosthodontic Society developed a multi-axis assessment protocol to evaluate the complex variations in patients who need prosthodontic care, and to classify the level of treatment difficulty. A previous report found the protocol to be sufficiently reliable. The purpose of this multi-center cohort study was to evaluate the validity of this multi-axis assessment protocol. Methods: The treatment difficulty was evaluated using the multi-axis assessment protocol before starting prosthodontic treatment. The time required for active prosthodontic treatment, medical resources such as treatment cost, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment, were evaluated after treatment completion. The construct validity of this protocol was assessed by the correlation between the dentist's pre-operative subjective assessment of the treatment difficulty, and the level of difficulty determined by this protocol. The predictive validity was assessed estimating the correlations between a “comprehensive level of treatment difficulty” based on the four axes of this protocol and total treatment cost, total treatment time, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment. Results: The construct validity of this protocol was well documented except for psychological assessment. Regarding the predictive validity, the comprehensive level of treatment difficulty assessed before treatment was significantly correlated with the three surrogate endpoints known to be related to the treatment difficulty (total treatment cost, treatment time, and improvement in the oral health-related QOL). To further clarify the validity of the protocol according to patients’ oral condition, a subgroup analysis by defects was performed. Analyses revealed that treatment difficulty assessment before treatment was significantly related to one or two surrogate endpoints in the fully edentulous patients and the partially edentulous patients. No significant relationship was observed in the patients with mixture of full/partial edentulism and the patients with teeth problems, possibly due to the small sample size in these groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that the multi-axis assessment protocol was sufficiently valid to predict the level of treatment difficulty in prosthodontic care in patients with fully edentulous defects and with partially edentulous defects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-170
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Prosthodontic Research
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Prosthodontics
Epidemiologic Studies
Japan
Therapeutics
Oral Health
Health Care Costs
Biomarkers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society. / Kuboki, Takuo; Ichikawa, Tetsuo; Baba, Kazuyoshi; Fujisawa, Masanori; Sato, Hironobu; Aita, Hideki; Koyama, Shigeto; Hideshima, Masayuki; Sato, Yuji; Wake, Hiroyuki; Kimura-Ono, Aya; Nagao, Kan; Kodaira-Ueda, Yorika; Tamaki, Katsushi; Sadamori, Shinsuke; Tsuga, Kazuhiro; Nishi, Yasuhiro; Sawase, Takashi; Koshino, Hisashi; Masumi, Shin ichi; Sakurai, Kaoru; Ishibashi, Kanji; Ohyama, Takashi; Akagawa, Yasumasa; Hirai, Toshihiro; Sasaki, Keiichi; Koyano, Kiyoshi; Yatani, Hirofumi; Matsumura, Hideo.

In: Journal of Prosthodontic Research, Vol. 62, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 162-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuboki, T, Ichikawa, T, Baba, K, Fujisawa, M, Sato, H, Aita, H, Koyama, S, Hideshima, M, Sato, Y, Wake, H, Kimura-Ono, A, Nagao, K, Kodaira-Ueda, Y, Tamaki, K, Sadamori, S, Tsuga, K, Nishi, Y, Sawase, T, Koshino, H, Masumi, SI, Sakurai, K, Ishibashi, K, Ohyama, T, Akagawa, Y, Hirai, T, Sasaki, K, Koyano, K, Yatani, H & Matsumura, H 2018, 'A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society', Journal of Prosthodontic Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.002
Kuboki, Takuo ; Ichikawa, Tetsuo ; Baba, Kazuyoshi ; Fujisawa, Masanori ; Sato, Hironobu ; Aita, Hideki ; Koyama, Shigeto ; Hideshima, Masayuki ; Sato, Yuji ; Wake, Hiroyuki ; Kimura-Ono, Aya ; Nagao, Kan ; Kodaira-Ueda, Yorika ; Tamaki, Katsushi ; Sadamori, Shinsuke ; Tsuga, Kazuhiro ; Nishi, Yasuhiro ; Sawase, Takashi ; Koshino, Hisashi ; Masumi, Shin ichi ; Sakurai, Kaoru ; Ishibashi, Kanji ; Ohyama, Takashi ; Akagawa, Yasumasa ; Hirai, Toshihiro ; Sasaki, Keiichi ; Koyano, Kiyoshi ; Yatani, Hirofumi ; Matsumura, Hideo. / A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society. In: Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2018 ; Vol. 62, No. 2. pp. 162-170.
@article{8103c4d33a9246e0b1217b2fd276fb6a,
title = "A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society",
abstract = "Purpose: The Japan Prosthodontic Society developed a multi-axis assessment protocol to evaluate the complex variations in patients who need prosthodontic care, and to classify the level of treatment difficulty. A previous report found the protocol to be sufficiently reliable. The purpose of this multi-center cohort study was to evaluate the validity of this multi-axis assessment protocol. Methods: The treatment difficulty was evaluated using the multi-axis assessment protocol before starting prosthodontic treatment. The time required for active prosthodontic treatment, medical resources such as treatment cost, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment, were evaluated after treatment completion. The construct validity of this protocol was assessed by the correlation between the dentist's pre-operative subjective assessment of the treatment difficulty, and the level of difficulty determined by this protocol. The predictive validity was assessed estimating the correlations between a “comprehensive level of treatment difficulty” based on the four axes of this protocol and total treatment cost, total treatment time, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment. Results: The construct validity of this protocol was well documented except for psychological assessment. Regarding the predictive validity, the comprehensive level of treatment difficulty assessed before treatment was significantly correlated with the three surrogate endpoints known to be related to the treatment difficulty (total treatment cost, treatment time, and improvement in the oral health-related QOL). To further clarify the validity of the protocol according to patients’ oral condition, a subgroup analysis by defects was performed. Analyses revealed that treatment difficulty assessment before treatment was significantly related to one or two surrogate endpoints in the fully edentulous patients and the partially edentulous patients. No significant relationship was observed in the patients with mixture of full/partial edentulism and the patients with teeth problems, possibly due to the small sample size in these groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that the multi-axis assessment protocol was sufficiently valid to predict the level of treatment difficulty in prosthodontic care in patients with fully edentulous defects and with partially edentulous defects.",
author = "Takuo Kuboki and Tetsuo Ichikawa and Kazuyoshi Baba and Masanori Fujisawa and Hironobu Sato and Hideki Aita and Shigeto Koyama and Masayuki Hideshima and Yuji Sato and Hiroyuki Wake and Aya Kimura-Ono and Kan Nagao and Yorika Kodaira-Ueda and Katsushi Tamaki and Shinsuke Sadamori and Kazuhiro Tsuga and Yasuhiro Nishi and Takashi Sawase and Hisashi Koshino and Masumi, {Shin ichi} and Kaoru Sakurai and Kanji Ishibashi and Takashi Ohyama and Yasumasa Akagawa and Toshihiro Hirai and Keiichi Sasaki and Kiyoshi Koyano and Hirofumi Yatani and Hideo Matsumura",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "162--170",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontic Research",
issn = "1883-1958",
publisher = "公益社団法人 日本補綴歯科学会",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-centered epidemiological study evaluating the validity of the treatment difficulty indices developed by the Japan Prosthodontic Society

AU - Kuboki, Takuo

AU - Ichikawa, Tetsuo

AU - Baba, Kazuyoshi

AU - Fujisawa, Masanori

AU - Sato, Hironobu

AU - Aita, Hideki

AU - Koyama, Shigeto

AU - Hideshima, Masayuki

AU - Sato, Yuji

AU - Wake, Hiroyuki

AU - Kimura-Ono, Aya

AU - Nagao, Kan

AU - Kodaira-Ueda, Yorika

AU - Tamaki, Katsushi

AU - Sadamori, Shinsuke

AU - Tsuga, Kazuhiro

AU - Nishi, Yasuhiro

AU - Sawase, Takashi

AU - Koshino, Hisashi

AU - Masumi, Shin ichi

AU - Sakurai, Kaoru

AU - Ishibashi, Kanji

AU - Ohyama, Takashi

AU - Akagawa, Yasumasa

AU - Hirai, Toshihiro

AU - Sasaki, Keiichi

AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi

AU - Yatani, Hirofumi

AU - Matsumura, Hideo

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Purpose: The Japan Prosthodontic Society developed a multi-axis assessment protocol to evaluate the complex variations in patients who need prosthodontic care, and to classify the level of treatment difficulty. A previous report found the protocol to be sufficiently reliable. The purpose of this multi-center cohort study was to evaluate the validity of this multi-axis assessment protocol. Methods: The treatment difficulty was evaluated using the multi-axis assessment protocol before starting prosthodontic treatment. The time required for active prosthodontic treatment, medical resources such as treatment cost, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment, were evaluated after treatment completion. The construct validity of this protocol was assessed by the correlation between the dentist's pre-operative subjective assessment of the treatment difficulty, and the level of difficulty determined by this protocol. The predictive validity was assessed estimating the correlations between a “comprehensive level of treatment difficulty” based on the four axes of this protocol and total treatment cost, total treatment time, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment. Results: The construct validity of this protocol was well documented except for psychological assessment. Regarding the predictive validity, the comprehensive level of treatment difficulty assessed before treatment was significantly correlated with the three surrogate endpoints known to be related to the treatment difficulty (total treatment cost, treatment time, and improvement in the oral health-related QOL). To further clarify the validity of the protocol according to patients’ oral condition, a subgroup analysis by defects was performed. Analyses revealed that treatment difficulty assessment before treatment was significantly related to one or two surrogate endpoints in the fully edentulous patients and the partially edentulous patients. No significant relationship was observed in the patients with mixture of full/partial edentulism and the patients with teeth problems, possibly due to the small sample size in these groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that the multi-axis assessment protocol was sufficiently valid to predict the level of treatment difficulty in prosthodontic care in patients with fully edentulous defects and with partially edentulous defects.

AB - Purpose: The Japan Prosthodontic Society developed a multi-axis assessment protocol to evaluate the complex variations in patients who need prosthodontic care, and to classify the level of treatment difficulty. A previous report found the protocol to be sufficiently reliable. The purpose of this multi-center cohort study was to evaluate the validity of this multi-axis assessment protocol. Methods: The treatment difficulty was evaluated using the multi-axis assessment protocol before starting prosthodontic treatment. The time required for active prosthodontic treatment, medical resources such as treatment cost, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment, were evaluated after treatment completion. The construct validity of this protocol was assessed by the correlation between the dentist's pre-operative subjective assessment of the treatment difficulty, and the level of difficulty determined by this protocol. The predictive validity was assessed estimating the correlations between a “comprehensive level of treatment difficulty” based on the four axes of this protocol and total treatment cost, total treatment time, and changes in the oral health-related QOL before and after treatment. Results: The construct validity of this protocol was well documented except for psychological assessment. Regarding the predictive validity, the comprehensive level of treatment difficulty assessed before treatment was significantly correlated with the three surrogate endpoints known to be related to the treatment difficulty (total treatment cost, treatment time, and improvement in the oral health-related QOL). To further clarify the validity of the protocol according to patients’ oral condition, a subgroup analysis by defects was performed. Analyses revealed that treatment difficulty assessment before treatment was significantly related to one or two surrogate endpoints in the fully edentulous patients and the partially edentulous patients. No significant relationship was observed in the patients with mixture of full/partial edentulism and the patients with teeth problems, possibly due to the small sample size in these groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that the multi-axis assessment protocol was sufficiently valid to predict the level of treatment difficulty in prosthodontic care in patients with fully edentulous defects and with partially edentulous defects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029155171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029155171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 28916466

AN - SCOPUS:85029155171

VL - 62

SP - 162

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

SN - 1883-1958

IS - 2

ER -