A search for source side mantle anisotropy

Satoshi Kaneshima, Paul G. Silver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Shear wave splitting due to source‐side mantle anisotropy is estimated from broadband teleseismic S waves using a suite of 19 subduction zone events more than 50km depth and recorded at several RSTN stations. We assume that there are at most two anisotropic regions along the ray path, one on the source side and one on the receiver side, and that receiver‐side splitting is known from analysis of SKS. It is found that splitting is not detectable below the slab in most cases. There are, however, two specific regions, one beneath Peru and one beneath Kamchatka that indicate significant source side anisotropy. Based on two nearby intermediate focus events in each region, splitting delay times are found to be 1.0–1.5s with the fast polarization direction perpendicular to the trench. Assuming 4% intrinsic anisotropy, this would correspond to path lengths of 100–170 km below the slab. Both regions are characterized by abrupt changes in along‐strike slab properties, a change in slab dip in the case of Peru, and a cessation of deep focus seismicity in the case of Kamchatka. We speculate that the anisotropy is caused by an associated local disturbance in asthenospheric flow. That the shear‐wave splitting parameters of S and SKS are consistent with each other in most cases, suggests that large‐scale anisotropy in the lower mantle is very small, probably no more than a fraction of a percent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1049-1052
Number of pages4
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Earth mantle
anisotropy
mantle
slab
slabs
Peru
S waves
S-wave
teleseismic wave
wave splitting
lower mantle
subduction zone
trench
seismicity
dip
rays
disturbances
time lag
polarization
receivers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

A search for source side mantle anisotropy. / Kaneshima, Satoshi; Silver, Paul G.

In: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 19, No. 10, 01.01.1992, p. 1049-1052.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaneshima, Satoshi ; Silver, Paul G. / A search for source side mantle anisotropy. In: Geophysical Research Letters. 1992 ; Vol. 19, No. 10. pp. 1049-1052.
@article{aba0c9b9a7e84a1f8c4b8d331b313fa9,
title = "A search for source side mantle anisotropy",
abstract = "Shear wave splitting due to source‐side mantle anisotropy is estimated from broadband teleseismic S waves using a suite of 19 subduction zone events more than 50km depth and recorded at several RSTN stations. We assume that there are at most two anisotropic regions along the ray path, one on the source side and one on the receiver side, and that receiver‐side splitting is known from analysis of SKS. It is found that splitting is not detectable below the slab in most cases. There are, however, two specific regions, one beneath Peru and one beneath Kamchatka that indicate significant source side anisotropy. Based on two nearby intermediate focus events in each region, splitting delay times are found to be 1.0–1.5s with the fast polarization direction perpendicular to the trench. Assuming 4{\%} intrinsic anisotropy, this would correspond to path lengths of 100–170 km below the slab. Both regions are characterized by abrupt changes in along‐strike slab properties, a change in slab dip in the case of Peru, and a cessation of deep focus seismicity in the case of Kamchatka. We speculate that the anisotropy is caused by an associated local disturbance in asthenospheric flow. That the shear‐wave splitting parameters of S and SKS are consistent with each other in most cases, suggests that large‐scale anisotropy in the lower mantle is very small, probably no more than a fraction of a percent.",
author = "Satoshi Kaneshima and Silver, {Paul G.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/92GL00899",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1049--1052",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",
issn = "0094-8276",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A search for source side mantle anisotropy

AU - Kaneshima, Satoshi

AU - Silver, Paul G.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Shear wave splitting due to source‐side mantle anisotropy is estimated from broadband teleseismic S waves using a suite of 19 subduction zone events more than 50km depth and recorded at several RSTN stations. We assume that there are at most two anisotropic regions along the ray path, one on the source side and one on the receiver side, and that receiver‐side splitting is known from analysis of SKS. It is found that splitting is not detectable below the slab in most cases. There are, however, two specific regions, one beneath Peru and one beneath Kamchatka that indicate significant source side anisotropy. Based on two nearby intermediate focus events in each region, splitting delay times are found to be 1.0–1.5s with the fast polarization direction perpendicular to the trench. Assuming 4% intrinsic anisotropy, this would correspond to path lengths of 100–170 km below the slab. Both regions are characterized by abrupt changes in along‐strike slab properties, a change in slab dip in the case of Peru, and a cessation of deep focus seismicity in the case of Kamchatka. We speculate that the anisotropy is caused by an associated local disturbance in asthenospheric flow. That the shear‐wave splitting parameters of S and SKS are consistent with each other in most cases, suggests that large‐scale anisotropy in the lower mantle is very small, probably no more than a fraction of a percent.

AB - Shear wave splitting due to source‐side mantle anisotropy is estimated from broadband teleseismic S waves using a suite of 19 subduction zone events more than 50km depth and recorded at several RSTN stations. We assume that there are at most two anisotropic regions along the ray path, one on the source side and one on the receiver side, and that receiver‐side splitting is known from analysis of SKS. It is found that splitting is not detectable below the slab in most cases. There are, however, two specific regions, one beneath Peru and one beneath Kamchatka that indicate significant source side anisotropy. Based on two nearby intermediate focus events in each region, splitting delay times are found to be 1.0–1.5s with the fast polarization direction perpendicular to the trench. Assuming 4% intrinsic anisotropy, this would correspond to path lengths of 100–170 km below the slab. Both regions are characterized by abrupt changes in along‐strike slab properties, a change in slab dip in the case of Peru, and a cessation of deep focus seismicity in the case of Kamchatka. We speculate that the anisotropy is caused by an associated local disturbance in asthenospheric flow. That the shear‐wave splitting parameters of S and SKS are consistent with each other in most cases, suggests that large‐scale anisotropy in the lower mantle is very small, probably no more than a fraction of a percent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026450812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026450812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/92GL00899

DO - 10.1029/92GL00899

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1049

EP - 1052

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 10

ER -