A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate

Choirul Anam, Toshioh Fujibuchi, Takatoshi Toyoda, Naoki Sato, Freddy Haryanto, Rena Widita, Idam Arif, Geoff Dougherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between the pixel value (I) of the CT localizer radiograph and waterequivalent thickness (tw) in a straightforward procedure. We used a body CTDI phantom, which was scanned in the AP and LAT projections. After transformation from the pixel values of the images to tw, water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and sizespecific dose estimate were calculated on an anthropomorphic phantom and 30 patients retrospectively. We found a linear correlation between I and tw, with R2 ≥ 0.980. The Dw values based on the CT localizer radiograph were comparable to those calculated using axial images. The Dw difference for the anthropomorphic phantom between AP projection and axial images was 5.4 ± 4.2%, and between LAT projection and axial images was 6.7 ± 5.3%. The Dw differences for the patients between CT localizer radiograph and axial images was 2.3 ± 3.2%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-168
Number of pages11
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume179
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

calibrating
pixels
dosage
Water
estimates
water
projection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate. / Anam, Choirul; Fujibuchi, Toshioh; Toyoda, Takatoshi; Sato, Naoki; Haryanto, Freddy; Widita, Rena; Arif, Idam; Dougherty, Geoff.

In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 179, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 158-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anam, Choirul ; Fujibuchi, Toshioh ; Toyoda, Takatoshi ; Sato, Naoki ; Haryanto, Freddy ; Widita, Rena ; Arif, Idam ; Dougherty, Geoff. / A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate. In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2018 ; Vol. 179, No. 2. pp. 158-168.
@article{f1e336ed62a64c3082410e7eb68f329c,
title = "A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate",
abstract = "The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between the pixel value (I) of the CT localizer radiograph and waterequivalent thickness (tw) in a straightforward procedure. We used a body CTDI phantom, which was scanned in the AP and LAT projections. After transformation from the pixel values of the images to tw, water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and sizespecific dose estimate were calculated on an anthropomorphic phantom and 30 patients retrospectively. We found a linear correlation between I and tw, with R2 ≥ 0.980. The Dw values based on the CT localizer radiograph were comparable to those calculated using axial images. The Dw difference for the anthropomorphic phantom between AP projection and axial images was 5.4 ± 4.2{\%}, and between LAT projection and axial images was 6.7 ± 5.3{\%}. The Dw differences for the patients between CT localizer radiograph and axial images was 2.3 ± 3.2{\%}.",
author = "Choirul Anam and Toshioh Fujibuchi and Takatoshi Toyoda and Naoki Sato and Freddy Haryanto and Rena Widita and Idam Arif and Geoff Dougherty",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncx241",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "158--168",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate

AU - Anam, Choirul

AU - Fujibuchi, Toshioh

AU - Toyoda, Takatoshi

AU - Sato, Naoki

AU - Haryanto, Freddy

AU - Widita, Rena

AU - Arif, Idam

AU - Dougherty, Geoff

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between the pixel value (I) of the CT localizer radiograph and waterequivalent thickness (tw) in a straightforward procedure. We used a body CTDI phantom, which was scanned in the AP and LAT projections. After transformation from the pixel values of the images to tw, water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and sizespecific dose estimate were calculated on an anthropomorphic phantom and 30 patients retrospectively. We found a linear correlation between I and tw, with R2 ≥ 0.980. The Dw values based on the CT localizer radiograph were comparable to those calculated using axial images. The Dw difference for the anthropomorphic phantom between AP projection and axial images was 5.4 ± 4.2%, and between LAT projection and axial images was 6.7 ± 5.3%. The Dw differences for the patients between CT localizer radiograph and axial images was 2.3 ± 3.2%.

AB - The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between the pixel value (I) of the CT localizer radiograph and waterequivalent thickness (tw) in a straightforward procedure. We used a body CTDI phantom, which was scanned in the AP and LAT projections. After transformation from the pixel values of the images to tw, water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and sizespecific dose estimate were calculated on an anthropomorphic phantom and 30 patients retrospectively. We found a linear correlation between I and tw, with R2 ≥ 0.980. The Dw values based on the CT localizer radiograph were comparable to those calculated using axial images. The Dw difference for the anthropomorphic phantom between AP projection and axial images was 5.4 ± 4.2%, and between LAT projection and axial images was 6.7 ± 5.3%. The Dw differences for the patients between CT localizer radiograph and axial images was 2.3 ± 3.2%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047128502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047128502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncx241

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncx241

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 158

EP - 168

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 2

ER -