Accuracy of radiographic assessment for the diagnosis of invasion depth in small invasive colorectal cancer.

T. Matsumoto, M. Esaki, K. Hizawa, K. Kurahara, K. Hirakawa, T. Yao, M. Iida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Radiographic findings of 113 submucosally invasive colorectal cancers (CRCs) <or=20 mm were investigated by two observers to examine whether barium radiography is predictive of the invasion depth in small colorectal cancer. Smooth surface, central barium fleck, fold convergency and eccentric rigidity were chosen as the radiographic determinants. Predictive values of the determinants for deep submucosal invasion were compared between 45 CRCs <or=10 mm and 68 CRCs >10 mm. 47 CRCs had invaded the submucosa superficially while 66 CRCs had invaded deeply. The concordance rate in the assessment of radiology was 90.3% in smooth surface, 92.9% in central barium fleck, 90.3% in fold convergency and 79.6% in eccentric rigidity. Positive predictive value of central barium fleck for deep submucosal invasion was significantly higher in CRCs>10 mm than in those <or=10 mm (0.86 vs. 0.64, p=0.034). In contrast, negative predictive values of smooth surface (0.89 vs. 0.34, p<0.00001), central barium fleck (0.87 vs. 0.38, p=0.0002), fold convergency (0.64 vs. 0.33, p=0.0023) and eccentric rigidity (0.79 vs. 0.48, p=0.023) were significantly higher in CRCs <or=10 mm than in those >10 mm. These findings suggest that barium radiography is a procedure which can give useful information in prediction of invasion depth in CRCs <or=10 mm in size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-616
Number of pages6
JournalThe British journal of radiology
Volume76
Issue number909
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2003

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of radiographic assessment for the diagnosis of invasion depth in small invasive colorectal cancer.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this