Advantages of the L-incision approach comprising a combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy for aortic arch aneurysms

Yasuhisa Oishi, Hiromichi Sonoda, Yoshihisa Tanoue, Takahiro Nishida, Shigehiko Tokunaga, Atsuhiro Nakashima, Yuichi Shiokawa, Ryuji Tominaga

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although surgical outcomes of total arch replacement have improved, the strategy for extended arch aneurysms remains controversial. We have applied the L-incision approach (combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy) for total arch replacement for single-stage repair of extensive arch aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed the operative outcomes of patients who underwent total arch or extended total arch replacement for degenerative aneurysms from 1999 to 2010. Operations were performed via median sternotomy in 47 patients (M group) and the L-incision approach was used in 38 patients (L group). Through the L-incision approach, we were able to complete distal anastomosis below the pulmonary hilus. The L-incision approach has advantages of reducing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and lower body circulatory arrest times compared with the M group. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and renal dysfunction were less frequent in the L group than those in the M group. Respiratory dysfunction and wound infection were similar between the groups. Hospital mortalities were 5.3% in the L group and 6.4% in the M group. The L-incision approach has similar or better postoperative outcomes compared with the median sternotomy approach. This approach could be useful for single-stage extended total arch replacement with relatively low risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-283
Number of pages4
JournalInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Sternotomy
Aortic Aneurysm
Thoracotomy
Thoracic Aorta
Aneurysm
Vocal Cord Paralysis
Wound Infection
Hospital Mortality
Respiratory Tract Infections
Perfusion
Kidney
Lung

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Advantages of the L-incision approach comprising a combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy for aortic arch aneurysms. / Oishi, Yasuhisa; Sonoda, Hiromichi; Tanoue, Yoshihisa; Nishida, Takahiro; Tokunaga, Shigehiko; Nakashima, Atsuhiro; Shiokawa, Yuichi; Tominaga, Ryuji.

In: Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 280-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0468ecc6e9724e8fba22efa1779be798,
title = "Advantages of the L-incision approach comprising a combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy for aortic arch aneurysms",
abstract = "Although surgical outcomes of total arch replacement have improved, the strategy for extended arch aneurysms remains controversial. We have applied the L-incision approach (combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy) for total arch replacement for single-stage repair of extensive arch aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed the operative outcomes of patients who underwent total arch or extended total arch replacement for degenerative aneurysms from 1999 to 2010. Operations were performed via median sternotomy in 47 patients (M group) and the L-incision approach was used in 38 patients (L group). Through the L-incision approach, we were able to complete distal anastomosis below the pulmonary hilus. The L-incision approach has advantages of reducing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and lower body circulatory arrest times compared with the M group. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and renal dysfunction were less frequent in the L group than those in the M group. Respiratory dysfunction and wound infection were similar between the groups. Hospital mortalities were 5.3{\%} in the L group and 6.4{\%} in the M group. The L-incision approach has similar or better postoperative outcomes compared with the median sternotomy approach. This approach could be useful for single-stage extended total arch replacement with relatively low risk.",
author = "Yasuhisa Oishi and Hiromichi Sonoda and Yoshihisa Tanoue and Takahiro Nishida and Shigehiko Tokunaga and Atsuhiro Nakashima and Yuichi Shiokawa and Ryuji Tominaga",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1510/icvts.2011.266791",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "280--283",
journal = "Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1569-9293",
publisher = "European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advantages of the L-incision approach comprising a combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy for aortic arch aneurysms

AU - Oishi, Yasuhisa

AU - Sonoda, Hiromichi

AU - Tanoue, Yoshihisa

AU - Nishida, Takahiro

AU - Tokunaga, Shigehiko

AU - Nakashima, Atsuhiro

AU - Shiokawa, Yuichi

AU - Tominaga, Ryuji

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Although surgical outcomes of total arch replacement have improved, the strategy for extended arch aneurysms remains controversial. We have applied the L-incision approach (combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy) for total arch replacement for single-stage repair of extensive arch aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed the operative outcomes of patients who underwent total arch or extended total arch replacement for degenerative aneurysms from 1999 to 2010. Operations were performed via median sternotomy in 47 patients (M group) and the L-incision approach was used in 38 patients (L group). Through the L-incision approach, we were able to complete distal anastomosis below the pulmonary hilus. The L-incision approach has advantages of reducing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and lower body circulatory arrest times compared with the M group. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and renal dysfunction were less frequent in the L group than those in the M group. Respiratory dysfunction and wound infection were similar between the groups. Hospital mortalities were 5.3% in the L group and 6.4% in the M group. The L-incision approach has similar or better postoperative outcomes compared with the median sternotomy approach. This approach could be useful for single-stage extended total arch replacement with relatively low risk.

AB - Although surgical outcomes of total arch replacement have improved, the strategy for extended arch aneurysms remains controversial. We have applied the L-incision approach (combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper half-median sternotomy) for total arch replacement for single-stage repair of extensive arch aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed the operative outcomes of patients who underwent total arch or extended total arch replacement for degenerative aneurysms from 1999 to 2010. Operations were performed via median sternotomy in 47 patients (M group) and the L-incision approach was used in 38 patients (L group). Through the L-incision approach, we were able to complete distal anastomosis below the pulmonary hilus. The L-incision approach has advantages of reducing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and lower body circulatory arrest times compared with the M group. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and renal dysfunction were less frequent in the L group than those in the M group. Respiratory dysfunction and wound infection were similar between the groups. Hospital mortalities were 5.3% in the L group and 6.4% in the M group. The L-incision approach has similar or better postoperative outcomes compared with the median sternotomy approach. This approach could be useful for single-stage extended total arch replacement with relatively low risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052557917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052557917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1510/icvts.2011.266791

DO - 10.1510/icvts.2011.266791

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 280

EP - 283

JO - Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

JF - Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

SN - 1569-9293

IS - 3

ER -