Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Osamu Ikeda, Yoshihisa Sakaguchi, Yoshiro Aoki, Norifumi Harimoto, Jyunya Taomoto, Takaaki Masuda, Takefumi Ohga, Eisuke Adachi, Yasushi Toh, Takeshi Okamura, Hideo Baba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). Methods: Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient's constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2374-2379
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume23
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Gastrectomy
Stomach Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Constitution and Bylaws
Lymph Node Excision
C-Reactive Protein
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. / Ikeda, Osamu; Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa; Aoki, Yoshiro; Harimoto, Norifumi; Taomoto, Jyunya; Masuda, Takaaki; Ohga, Takefumi; Adachi, Eisuke; Toh, Yasushi; Okamura, Takeshi; Baba, Hideo.

In: Surgical endoscopy, Vol. 23, No. 10, 01.01.2009, p. 2374-2379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ikeda, O, Sakaguchi, Y, Aoki, Y, Harimoto, N, Taomoto, J, Masuda, T, Ohga, T, Adachi, E, Toh, Y, Okamura, T & Baba, H 2009, 'Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer', Surgical endoscopy, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2374-2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0360-3
Ikeda, Osamu ; Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa ; Aoki, Yoshiro ; Harimoto, Norifumi ; Taomoto, Jyunya ; Masuda, Takaaki ; Ohga, Takefumi ; Adachi, Eisuke ; Toh, Yasushi ; Okamura, Takeshi ; Baba, Hideo. / Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In: Surgical endoscopy. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 10. pp. 2374-2379.
@article{9a83e5fe69d54726b4ac2f245fe53187,
title = "Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). Methods: Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient's constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.",
author = "Osamu Ikeda and Yoshihisa Sakaguchi and Yoshiro Aoki and Norifumi Harimoto and Jyunya Taomoto and Takaaki Masuda and Takefumi Ohga and Eisuke Adachi and Yasushi Toh and Takeshi Okamura and Hideo Baba",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-009-0360-3",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2374--2379",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AU - Ikeda, Osamu

AU - Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa

AU - Aoki, Yoshiro

AU - Harimoto, Norifumi

AU - Taomoto, Jyunya

AU - Masuda, Takaaki

AU - Ohga, Takefumi

AU - Adachi, Eisuke

AU - Toh, Yasushi

AU - Okamura, Takeshi

AU - Baba, Hideo

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). Methods: Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient's constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). Methods: Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient's constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350020575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350020575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-009-0360-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-009-0360-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 19263143

AN - SCOPUS:70350020575

VL - 23

SP - 2374

EP - 2379

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 10

ER -