Aftermath of Fukushima

Avoiding another major nuclear disaster

Noriko Behling, Mark C. Williams, Thomas G. Behling, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Japan's laws to promote nuclear power, including the Dengen Sampo (the Three Electric Power Laws), have accelerated nuclear reactor construction via subsidies, grants, and other incentives. These laws also have had the perverse effects of discouraging promotion of safety as the highest priority, with consequences that can be seen in the Fukushima nuclear disaster. If the government decides to restart a portion of the reactor fleet, experience indicates that another serious nuclear accident could be expected again. Accidents, in effect, represent a recurring cost which should be built into business plans. Although improvements in reliability and safety will certainly be made, legislation alone cannot guarantee that these actions will create a culture of safety. Inevitably, the complex systems associated with nuclear reactors and the overwhelming influence of corporate officers who are focused on cutting costs in the near-term will make safety improvement an uphill battle. These factors are symptomatic of a worldwide nuclear industry that views safety as a cost to be managed. Unless the industry is incentivized to consider safety improvements as a source of greater profits in the long-term, the industry will continue to have a mindset of negligence toward safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-420
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Disasters
disaster
safety
Nuclear reactors
industry
Accidents
cost
nuclear accident
Costs
Industry
Nuclear industry
nuclear power
Nuclear energy
accident
Large scale systems
incentive
Profitability
legislation
power law

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Aftermath of Fukushima : Avoiding another major nuclear disaster. / Behling, Noriko; Williams, Mark C.; Behling, Thomas G.; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Energy Policy, 01.03.2019, p. 411-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Behling, Noriko ; Williams, Mark C. ; Behling, Thomas G. ; Managi, Shunsuke. / Aftermath of Fukushima : Avoiding another major nuclear disaster. In: Energy Policy. 2019 ; pp. 411-420.
@article{803431a9e9424dc19f9dba007bf5fbaa,
title = "Aftermath of Fukushima: Avoiding another major nuclear disaster",
abstract = "Japan's laws to promote nuclear power, including the Dengen Sampo (the Three Electric Power Laws), have accelerated nuclear reactor construction via subsidies, grants, and other incentives. These laws also have had the perverse effects of discouraging promotion of safety as the highest priority, with consequences that can be seen in the Fukushima nuclear disaster. If the government decides to restart a portion of the reactor fleet, experience indicates that another serious nuclear accident could be expected again. Accidents, in effect, represent a recurring cost which should be built into business plans. Although improvements in reliability and safety will certainly be made, legislation alone cannot guarantee that these actions will create a culture of safety. Inevitably, the complex systems associated with nuclear reactors and the overwhelming influence of corporate officers who are focused on cutting costs in the near-term will make safety improvement an uphill battle. These factors are symptomatic of a worldwide nuclear industry that views safety as a cost to be managed. Unless the industry is incentivized to consider safety improvements as a source of greater profits in the long-term, the industry will continue to have a mindset of negligence toward safety.",
author = "Noriko Behling and Williams, {Mark C.} and Behling, {Thomas G.} and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.038",
language = "English",
pages = "411--420",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aftermath of Fukushima

T2 - Avoiding another major nuclear disaster

AU - Behling, Noriko

AU - Williams, Mark C.

AU - Behling, Thomas G.

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Japan's laws to promote nuclear power, including the Dengen Sampo (the Three Electric Power Laws), have accelerated nuclear reactor construction via subsidies, grants, and other incentives. These laws also have had the perverse effects of discouraging promotion of safety as the highest priority, with consequences that can be seen in the Fukushima nuclear disaster. If the government decides to restart a portion of the reactor fleet, experience indicates that another serious nuclear accident could be expected again. Accidents, in effect, represent a recurring cost which should be built into business plans. Although improvements in reliability and safety will certainly be made, legislation alone cannot guarantee that these actions will create a culture of safety. Inevitably, the complex systems associated with nuclear reactors and the overwhelming influence of corporate officers who are focused on cutting costs in the near-term will make safety improvement an uphill battle. These factors are symptomatic of a worldwide nuclear industry that views safety as a cost to be managed. Unless the industry is incentivized to consider safety improvements as a source of greater profits in the long-term, the industry will continue to have a mindset of negligence toward safety.

AB - Japan's laws to promote nuclear power, including the Dengen Sampo (the Three Electric Power Laws), have accelerated nuclear reactor construction via subsidies, grants, and other incentives. These laws also have had the perverse effects of discouraging promotion of safety as the highest priority, with consequences that can be seen in the Fukushima nuclear disaster. If the government decides to restart a portion of the reactor fleet, experience indicates that another serious nuclear accident could be expected again. Accidents, in effect, represent a recurring cost which should be built into business plans. Although improvements in reliability and safety will certainly be made, legislation alone cannot guarantee that these actions will create a culture of safety. Inevitably, the complex systems associated with nuclear reactors and the overwhelming influence of corporate officers who are focused on cutting costs in the near-term will make safety improvement an uphill battle. These factors are symptomatic of a worldwide nuclear industry that views safety as a cost to be managed. Unless the industry is incentivized to consider safety improvements as a source of greater profits in the long-term, the industry will continue to have a mindset of negligence toward safety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057483269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057483269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.038

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.038

M3 - Article

SP - 411

EP - 420

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -