An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice

C. Jiao, M. G. Flanner, Y. Balkanski, S. E. Bauer, N. Bellouin, T. K. Berntsen, H. Bian, K. S. Carslaw, M. Chin, N. De Luca, T. Diehl, S. J. Ghan, T. Iversen, A. Kirkeväg, D. Koch, X. Liu, G. W. Mann, J. E. Penner, G. Pitari, M. SchulzØ. Seland Ø., R. B. Skeie, S. D. Steenrod, P. Stier, T. Takemura, K. Tsigaridis, T. Van Noije, Y. Yun, K. Zhang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are-4.4 (-13.2 to +10.7) ng g−1 for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (-13.0 to +21.4) ng g−1 for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g−1. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90° N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07-0.25) W m−2 and 0.18 (0.06-0.28) W m−2 in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m−2 for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2399-2417
    Number of pages19
    JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
    Volume14
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 7 2014

    Fingerprint

    black carbon
    sea ice
    snow
    aerosol
    meltwater

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Atmospheric Science

    Cite this

    Jiao, C., Flanner, M. G., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., ... Zhang, K. (2014). An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(5), 2399-2417. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014

    An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice. / Jiao, C.; Flanner, M. G.; Balkanski, Y.; Bauer, S. E.; Bellouin, N.; Berntsen, T. K.; Bian, H.; Carslaw, K. S.; Chin, M.; De Luca, N.; Diehl, T.; Ghan, S. J.; Iversen, T.; Kirkeväg, A.; Koch, D.; Liu, X.; Mann, G. W.; Penner, J. E.; Pitari, G.; Schulz, M.; Seland Ø., Ø.; Skeie, R. B.; Steenrod, S. D.; Stier, P.; Takemura, T.; Tsigaridis, K.; Van Noije, T.; Yun, Y.; Zhang, K.

    In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, No. 5, 07.03.2014, p. 2399-2417.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jiao, C, Flanner, MG, Balkanski, Y, Bauer, SE, Bellouin, N, Berntsen, TK, Bian, H, Carslaw, KS, Chin, M, De Luca, N, Diehl, T, Ghan, SJ, Iversen, T, Kirkeväg, A, Koch, D, Liu, X, Mann, GW, Penner, JE, Pitari, G, Schulz, M, Seland Ø., Ø, Skeie, RB, Steenrod, SD, Stier, P, Takemura, T, Tsigaridis, K, Van Noije, T, Yun, Y & Zhang, K 2014, 'An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2399-2417. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014
    Jiao C, Flanner MG, Balkanski Y, Bauer SE, Bellouin N, Berntsen TK et al. An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2014 Mar 7;14(5):2399-2417. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014
    Jiao, C. ; Flanner, M. G. ; Balkanski, Y. ; Bauer, S. E. ; Bellouin, N. ; Berntsen, T. K. ; Bian, H. ; Carslaw, K. S. ; Chin, M. ; De Luca, N. ; Diehl, T. ; Ghan, S. J. ; Iversen, T. ; Kirkeväg, A. ; Koch, D. ; Liu, X. ; Mann, G. W. ; Penner, J. E. ; Pitari, G. ; Schulz, M. ; Seland Ø., Ø. ; Skeie, R. B. ; Steenrod, S. D. ; Stier, P. ; Takemura, T. ; Tsigaridis, K. ; Van Noije, T. ; Yun, Y. ; Zhang, K. / An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 2399-2417.
    @article{0df70011a97246fd978a36c112a09645,
    title = "An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice",
    abstract = "Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are-4.4 (-13.2 to +10.7) ng g−1 for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (-13.0 to +21.4) ng g−1 for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g−1. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90° N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07-0.25) W m−2 and 0.18 (0.06-0.28) W m−2 in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m−2 for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.",
    author = "C. Jiao and Flanner, {M. G.} and Y. Balkanski and Bauer, {S. E.} and N. Bellouin and Berntsen, {T. K.} and H. Bian and Carslaw, {K. S.} and M. Chin and {De Luca}, N. and T. Diehl and Ghan, {S. J.} and T. Iversen and A. Kirkev{\"a}g and D. Koch and X. Liu and Mann, {G. W.} and Penner, {J. E.} and G. Pitari and M. Schulz and {Seland {\O}.}, {\O}. and Skeie, {R. B.} and Steenrod, {S. D.} and P. Stier and T. Takemura and K. Tsigaridis and {Van Noije}, T. and Y. Yun and K. Zhang",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    day = "7",
    doi = "10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "2399--2417",
    journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",
    issn = "1680-7316",
    publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An aerocom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice

    AU - Jiao, C.

    AU - Flanner, M. G.

    AU - Balkanski, Y.

    AU - Bauer, S. E.

    AU - Bellouin, N.

    AU - Berntsen, T. K.

    AU - Bian, H.

    AU - Carslaw, K. S.

    AU - Chin, M.

    AU - De Luca, N.

    AU - Diehl, T.

    AU - Ghan, S. J.

    AU - Iversen, T.

    AU - Kirkeväg, A.

    AU - Koch, D.

    AU - Liu, X.

    AU - Mann, G. W.

    AU - Penner, J. E.

    AU - Pitari, G.

    AU - Schulz, M.

    AU - Seland Ø., Ø.

    AU - Skeie, R. B.

    AU - Steenrod, S. D.

    AU - Stier, P.

    AU - Takemura, T.

    AU - Tsigaridis, K.

    AU - Van Noije, T.

    AU - Yun, Y.

    AU - Zhang, K.

    PY - 2014/3/7

    Y1 - 2014/3/7

    N2 - Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are-4.4 (-13.2 to +10.7) ng g−1 for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (-13.0 to +21.4) ng g−1 for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g−1. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90° N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07-0.25) W m−2 and 0.18 (0.06-0.28) W m−2 in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m−2 for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.

    AB - Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are-4.4 (-13.2 to +10.7) ng g−1 for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (-13.0 to +21.4) ng g−1 for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g−1. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90° N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07-0.25) W m−2 and 0.18 (0.06-0.28) W m−2 in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m−2 for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896794844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896794844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014

    DO - 10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84896794844

    VL - 14

    SP - 2399

    EP - 2417

    JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    SN - 1680-7316

    IS - 5

    ER -