An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

Satoshi Obata, Satoshi Ieiri, Munenori Uemura, Takahiro Jimbo, Ryota Souzaki, Noriyuki Matsuoka, Tamotsu Katayama, Makoto Hashizume, Tomoaki Taguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a system to objectively verify the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons. Materials and Methods: We developed a thoracoscopic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia mimicking a newborn's size. The examinees were divided into Experts (n=10) and Trainees (n=19), and each group performed two tasks (Task 1, reduction of a herniated intestine from the thoracic space to the abdomen; Task 2, perform three suture ligatures of a diaphragm defect using intracorporeal knot-tying). The end points were the time required to complete Task 1, time score calculated using the residual time from the time limit for Task 2, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, degree of diaphragm deformation, and the residual defect areas after suturing. We also evaluated the total path length and velocity of the forceps tips using a three-dimensional position measurement instrument. Results: The Experts had significantly superior results for the time for Task 1, time score, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, and degree of diaphragm deformation in Task 2 (all P<.05). We found that the total path length and average velocities for the left forceps were inferior to those of the right forceps in both tasks in the Trainees (both P<.05, respectively), whereas the Expert group showed no significant laterality in these tasks. Conclusions: Our model could validate the quality of endoscopic surgical skills and could differentiate between Expert and Trainee pediatric surgeons. The Experts could use their forceps equally well to perform tasks even in a small working space.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-781
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Herniorrhaphy
Pediatrics
Surgical Instruments
Diaphragm
Sutures
Air Pressure
Abdomen
Intestines
Ligation
Surgeons
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernias
Thorax
Newborn Infant

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair. / Obata, Satoshi; Ieiri, Satoshi; Uemura, Munenori; Jimbo, Takahiro; Souzaki, Ryota; Matsuoka, Noriyuki; Katayama, Tamotsu; Hashizume, Makoto; Taguchi, Tomoaki.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 775-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Obata, Satoshi ; Ieiri, Satoshi ; Uemura, Munenori ; Jimbo, Takahiro ; Souzaki, Ryota ; Matsuoka, Noriyuki ; Katayama, Tamotsu ; Hashizume, Makoto ; Taguchi, Tomoaki. / An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 775-781.
@article{7b93486e00d8448ea149bae64a9a3e56,
title = "An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair",
abstract = "Purpose: We developed a system to objectively verify the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons. Materials and Methods: We developed a thoracoscopic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia mimicking a newborn's size. The examinees were divided into Experts (n=10) and Trainees (n=19), and each group performed two tasks (Task 1, reduction of a herniated intestine from the thoracic space to the abdomen; Task 2, perform three suture ligatures of a diaphragm defect using intracorporeal knot-tying). The end points were the time required to complete Task 1, time score calculated using the residual time from the time limit for Task 2, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, degree of diaphragm deformation, and the residual defect areas after suturing. We also evaluated the total path length and velocity of the forceps tips using a three-dimensional position measurement instrument. Results: The Experts had significantly superior results for the time for Task 1, time score, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, and degree of diaphragm deformation in Task 2 (all P<.05). We found that the total path length and average velocities for the left forceps were inferior to those of the right forceps in both tasks in the Trainees (both P<.05, respectively), whereas the Expert group showed no significant laterality in these tasks. Conclusions: Our model could validate the quality of endoscopic surgical skills and could differentiate between Expert and Trainee pediatric surgeons. The Experts could use their forceps equally well to perform tasks even in a small working space.",
author = "Satoshi Obata and Satoshi Ieiri and Munenori Uemura and Takahiro Jimbo and Ryota Souzaki and Noriyuki Matsuoka and Tamotsu Katayama and Makoto Hashizume and Tomoaki Taguchi",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2014.0259",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "775--781",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

AU - Obata, Satoshi

AU - Ieiri, Satoshi

AU - Uemura, Munenori

AU - Jimbo, Takahiro

AU - Souzaki, Ryota

AU - Matsuoka, Noriyuki

AU - Katayama, Tamotsu

AU - Hashizume, Makoto

AU - Taguchi, Tomoaki

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Purpose: We developed a system to objectively verify the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons. Materials and Methods: We developed a thoracoscopic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia mimicking a newborn's size. The examinees were divided into Experts (n=10) and Trainees (n=19), and each group performed two tasks (Task 1, reduction of a herniated intestine from the thoracic space to the abdomen; Task 2, perform three suture ligatures of a diaphragm defect using intracorporeal knot-tying). The end points were the time required to complete Task 1, time score calculated using the residual time from the time limit for Task 2, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, degree of diaphragm deformation, and the residual defect areas after suturing. We also evaluated the total path length and velocity of the forceps tips using a three-dimensional position measurement instrument. Results: The Experts had significantly superior results for the time for Task 1, time score, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, and degree of diaphragm deformation in Task 2 (all P<.05). We found that the total path length and average velocities for the left forceps were inferior to those of the right forceps in both tasks in the Trainees (both P<.05, respectively), whereas the Expert group showed no significant laterality in these tasks. Conclusions: Our model could validate the quality of endoscopic surgical skills and could differentiate between Expert and Trainee pediatric surgeons. The Experts could use their forceps equally well to perform tasks even in a small working space.

AB - Purpose: We developed a system to objectively verify the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons. Materials and Methods: We developed a thoracoscopic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia mimicking a newborn's size. The examinees were divided into Experts (n=10) and Trainees (n=19), and each group performed two tasks (Task 1, reduction of a herniated intestine from the thoracic space to the abdomen; Task 2, perform three suture ligatures of a diaphragm defect using intracorporeal knot-tying). The end points were the time required to complete Task 1, time score calculated using the residual time from the time limit for Task 2, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, degree of diaphragm deformation, and the residual defect areas after suturing. We also evaluated the total path length and velocity of the forceps tips using a three-dimensional position measurement instrument. Results: The Experts had significantly superior results for the time for Task 1, time score, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, and degree of diaphragm deformation in Task 2 (all P<.05). We found that the total path length and average velocities for the left forceps were inferior to those of the right forceps in both tasks in the Trainees (both P<.05, respectively), whereas the Expert group showed no significant laterality in these tasks. Conclusions: Our model could validate the quality of endoscopic surgical skills and could differentiate between Expert and Trainee pediatric surgeons. The Experts could use their forceps equally well to perform tasks even in a small working space.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941883482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941883482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2014.0259

DO - 10.1089/lap.2014.0259

M3 - Article

C2 - 26375773

AN - SCOPUS:84941883482

VL - 25

SP - 775

EP - 781

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 9

ER -