Abstract
This study examined the processing of two types of Japanese causative cleft constructions (subject-gap vs. object-gap) by conducting an event-related brain potential experiment to clarify the processing mechanism of long-distance dependencies. The results demonstrated that the subject-gap constructions elicited larger P600 effects than the object-gap constructions. Based on these findings, we argue that the linear distance rather than the structural distance between the extracted argument (filler) and its original gap position is a crucial factor for determining processing costs of gap-filler dependency in Japanese causative cleft constructions. This argument indicates that (at least) some types of long-distance dependencies are sensitive to linear distance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 407-421 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1 2016 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
An ERP Study of Causative Cleft Construction in Japanese : Evidence for the Preference of Shorter Linear Distance in Sentence Comprehension. / Yano, Masataka; Sakamoto, Tsutomu.
In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 407-421.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An ERP Study of Causative Cleft Construction in Japanese
T2 - Evidence for the Preference of Shorter Linear Distance in Sentence Comprehension
AU - Yano, Masataka
AU - Sakamoto, Tsutomu
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - This study examined the processing of two types of Japanese causative cleft constructions (subject-gap vs. object-gap) by conducting an event-related brain potential experiment to clarify the processing mechanism of long-distance dependencies. The results demonstrated that the subject-gap constructions elicited larger P600 effects than the object-gap constructions. Based on these findings, we argue that the linear distance rather than the structural distance between the extracted argument (filler) and its original gap position is a crucial factor for determining processing costs of gap-filler dependency in Japanese causative cleft constructions. This argument indicates that (at least) some types of long-distance dependencies are sensitive to linear distance.
AB - This study examined the processing of two types of Japanese causative cleft constructions (subject-gap vs. object-gap) by conducting an event-related brain potential experiment to clarify the processing mechanism of long-distance dependencies. The results demonstrated that the subject-gap constructions elicited larger P600 effects than the object-gap constructions. Based on these findings, we argue that the linear distance rather than the structural distance between the extracted argument (filler) and its original gap position is a crucial factor for determining processing costs of gap-filler dependency in Japanese causative cleft constructions. This argument indicates that (at least) some types of long-distance dependencies are sensitive to linear distance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924244770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924244770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10936-015-9359-1
DO - 10.1007/s10936-015-9359-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 25749432
AN - SCOPUS:84924244770
VL - 45
SP - 407
EP - 421
JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
SN - 0090-6905
IS - 2
ER -