Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: Significant differences between young and elderly

Kouji Tsugawa, Nobuhiro Koyanagi, Makoto Hashizume, Katsuhiko Ayukawa, Hiroya Wada, Morimasa Tomikawa, Toshihiko Ueyama, Keizo Sugimachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8% of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7%). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5%) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)544-549
Number of pages6
JournalWorld journal of surgery
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2002

Fingerprint

Liver
Wounds and Injuries
Patient Rights
Motor Vehicles
Accidents
Emergencies
Subphrenic Abscess
Injury Severity Score
Intraoperative Complications
Coma
Pneumonia
Survival Rate
Retrospective Studies
Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Tsugawa, K., Koyanagi, N., Hashizume, M., Ayukawa, K., Wada, H., Tomikawa, M., ... Sugimachi, K. (2002). Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: Significant differences between young and elderly. World journal of surgery, 26(5), 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4

Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients : Significant differences between young and elderly. / Tsugawa, Kouji; Koyanagi, Nobuhiro; Hashizume, Makoto; Ayukawa, Katsuhiko; Wada, Hiroya; Tomikawa, Morimasa; Ueyama, Toshihiko; Sugimachi, Keizo.

In: World journal of surgery, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.05.2002, p. 544-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsugawa, K, Koyanagi, N, Hashizume, M, Ayukawa, K, Wada, H, Tomikawa, M, Ueyama, T & Sugimachi, K 2002, 'Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: Significant differences between young and elderly', World journal of surgery, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4
Tsugawa, Kouji ; Koyanagi, Nobuhiro ; Hashizume, Makoto ; Ayukawa, Katsuhiko ; Wada, Hiroya ; Tomikawa, Morimasa ; Ueyama, Toshihiko ; Sugimachi, Keizo. / Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients : Significant differences between young and elderly. In: World journal of surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 544-549.
@article{175c6081640241e7be73e462e10c4849,
title = "Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: Significant differences between young and elderly",
abstract = "The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3{\%} vs. 65.5{\%}; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8{\%} of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7{\%}). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5{\%}) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.",
author = "Kouji Tsugawa and Nobuhiro Koyanagi and Makoto Hashizume and Katsuhiko Ayukawa and Hiroya Wada and Morimasa Tomikawa and Toshihiko Ueyama and Keizo Sugimachi",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "544--549",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients

T2 - Significant differences between young and elderly

AU - Tsugawa, Kouji

AU - Koyanagi, Nobuhiro

AU - Hashizume, Makoto

AU - Ayukawa, Katsuhiko

AU - Wada, Hiroya

AU - Tomikawa, Morimasa

AU - Ueyama, Toshihiko

AU - Sugimachi, Keizo

PY - 2002/5/1

Y1 - 2002/5/1

N2 - The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8% of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7%). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5%) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.

AB - The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8% of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7%). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5%) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043175098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043175098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4

DO - 10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 12098042

AN - SCOPUS:0043175098

VL - 26

SP - 544

EP - 549

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 5

ER -