TY - JOUR
T1 - Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary disease
AU - the AFIRE Investigators
AU - Yasuda, Satoshi
AU - Kaikita, Koichi
AU - Akao, Masaharu
AU - Ako, Junya
AU - Matoba, Tetsuya
AU - Nakamura, Masato
AU - Miyauchi, Katsumi
AU - Hagiwara, Nobuhisa
AU - Kimura, Kazuo
AU - Hirayama, Atsushi
AU - Matsui, Kunihiko
AU - Ogawa, Hisao
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation through a contract with Bayer Yakuhin.
Funding Information:
Funded by the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.
Funding Information:
Dr. Yasuda reports receiving grant support from Takeda and Abbott and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Kaikita, receiving grant support from Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis Pharma, and SBI Pharma; Dr. Akao, receiving lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and grant support and lecture fees from Bayer Yakuhin and Daiichi Sankyo; Dr. Ako, receiving lecture fees from Bayer Yakuhin and Sanofi and grant support and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo; Dr. Matoba, receiving lecture fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Bayer Yakuhin; Dr. Nakamura, receiving grant support and honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Miyauchi, receiving lecture fees from Amgen Astel-las BioPharma, Astellas Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bayer Yakuhin, Sanofi, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Hagiwara, receiving grant support and lecture fees from Bayer Yakuhin and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and grant support from Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer Japan; Dr. Kimura, receiving lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, grant support, lecture fees, and advisory fees from Bayer Yakuhin, and grant support and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Sanofi; Dr. Hirayama, receiving lecture fees from Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, Sumitomo Dainip-pon Pharma, AstraZeneca, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Amgen Astellas BioPharma, grant support and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bayer Yakuhin, lecture and consulting fees from Toa Eiyo, grant support from Pfizer Japan, serving as an endowed chair for Boston Scientific Japan, Hokushin Medical, Abbott Japan, Active Medical, Fukuda Den-shi, Medtronic Japan, Japan Lifeline, and Kurihara Medical Instrument, and receiving lecture fees and serving as an endowed
PY - 2019/9/19
Y1 - 2019/9/19
N2 - BACKGROUND There are limited data from randomized trials evaluating the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. METHODS In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan, we randomly assigned 2236 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) more than 1 year earlier or who had angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease not requiring revascularization to receive monotherapy with rivaroxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause; this end point was analyzed for noninferiority with a noninferiority margin of 1.46. The primary safety end point was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; this end point was analyzed for superiority. RESULTS The trial was stopped early because of increased mortality in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for the primary efficacy end point, with event rates of 4.14% and 5.75% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for the primary safety end point, with event rates of 1.62% and 2.76% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS As antithrombotic therapy, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease.
AB - BACKGROUND There are limited data from randomized trials evaluating the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. METHODS In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan, we randomly assigned 2236 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) more than 1 year earlier or who had angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease not requiring revascularization to receive monotherapy with rivaroxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause; this end point was analyzed for noninferiority with a noninferiority margin of 1.46. The primary safety end point was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; this end point was analyzed for superiority. RESULTS The trial was stopped early because of increased mortality in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for the primary efficacy end point, with event rates of 4.14% and 5.75% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for the primary safety end point, with event rates of 1.62% and 2.76% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS As antithrombotic therapy, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072508959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072508959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1904143
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1904143
M3 - Article
C2 - 31475793
AN - SCOPUS:85072508959
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 381
SP - 1103
EP - 1113
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 12
ER -