Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication

T. Hamasaki, I. Soh, T. Takehara, Akihito Hagihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Very little is known about dentist-patient communicative behaviours in actual practice. This study evaluated dentist and patient perceptions of dentist-patient communication and patient outcome. Participants: The subjects were 171 dentist-patient pairs in Kitakyushu, Japan. Research design: Dentists and patients answered the same questionnaire items using the same response categories to evaluate dentist-patient communication. Based on the scores of patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication, patient-dentist pairs were categorised into one of 3 groups. Data analyses used one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression analysis, and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: We found that, with respect to dentist-patient communication, patients in the 'patient better' group (i.e., the patient's evaluation was more positive than the dentist's evaluation) were more likely to have a positive outcome (e.g., 'improvement of health and fear,' 'satisfaction with care') than those in the other two groups. Patients in the 'doctor better' group (i.e., the dentist's evaluation was the more positive) were more likely to have a negative outcome than those in the other two groups. Conclusions: A positive patient outcome is more likely when the patient's evaluation is better than a dentist's evaluation with respect to dentist-patient communicative behaviours. The method based on patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication might be effective in evaluating dentist-patient communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-279
Number of pages6
JournalCommunity Dental Health
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Dentists
Communication
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication. / Hamasaki, T.; Soh, I.; Takehara, T.; Hagihara, Akihito.

In: Community Dental Health, Vol. 28, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 274-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamasaki, T. ; Soh, I. ; Takehara, T. ; Hagihara, Akihito. / Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication. In: Community Dental Health. 2011 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 274-279.
@article{e98c1061020440788d4a54b5672a87d5,
title = "Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication",
abstract = "Objectives: Very little is known about dentist-patient communicative behaviours in actual practice. This study evaluated dentist and patient perceptions of dentist-patient communication and patient outcome. Participants: The subjects were 171 dentist-patient pairs in Kitakyushu, Japan. Research design: Dentists and patients answered the same questionnaire items using the same response categories to evaluate dentist-patient communication. Based on the scores of patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication, patient-dentist pairs were categorised into one of 3 groups. Data analyses used one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression analysis, and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: We found that, with respect to dentist-patient communication, patients in the 'patient better' group (i.e., the patient's evaluation was more positive than the dentist's evaluation) were more likely to have a positive outcome (e.g., 'improvement of health and fear,' 'satisfaction with care') than those in the other two groups. Patients in the 'doctor better' group (i.e., the dentist's evaluation was the more positive) were more likely to have a negative outcome than those in the other two groups. Conclusions: A positive patient outcome is more likely when the patient's evaluation is better than a dentist's evaluation with respect to dentist-patient communicative behaviours. The method based on patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication might be effective in evaluating dentist-patient communication.",
author = "T. Hamasaki and I. Soh and T. Takehara and Akihito Hagihara",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1922/CDH_2589Hagihara06",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "274--279",
journal = "Community Dental Health",
issn = "0265-539X",
publisher = "FDI World Dental Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication

AU - Hamasaki, T.

AU - Soh, I.

AU - Takehara, T.

AU - Hagihara, Akihito

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Objectives: Very little is known about dentist-patient communicative behaviours in actual practice. This study evaluated dentist and patient perceptions of dentist-patient communication and patient outcome. Participants: The subjects were 171 dentist-patient pairs in Kitakyushu, Japan. Research design: Dentists and patients answered the same questionnaire items using the same response categories to evaluate dentist-patient communication. Based on the scores of patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication, patient-dentist pairs were categorised into one of 3 groups. Data analyses used one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression analysis, and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: We found that, with respect to dentist-patient communication, patients in the 'patient better' group (i.e., the patient's evaluation was more positive than the dentist's evaluation) were more likely to have a positive outcome (e.g., 'improvement of health and fear,' 'satisfaction with care') than those in the other two groups. Patients in the 'doctor better' group (i.e., the dentist's evaluation was the more positive) were more likely to have a negative outcome than those in the other two groups. Conclusions: A positive patient outcome is more likely when the patient's evaluation is better than a dentist's evaluation with respect to dentist-patient communicative behaviours. The method based on patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication might be effective in evaluating dentist-patient communication.

AB - Objectives: Very little is known about dentist-patient communicative behaviours in actual practice. This study evaluated dentist and patient perceptions of dentist-patient communication and patient outcome. Participants: The subjects were 171 dentist-patient pairs in Kitakyushu, Japan. Research design: Dentists and patients answered the same questionnaire items using the same response categories to evaluate dentist-patient communication. Based on the scores of patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication, patient-dentist pairs were categorised into one of 3 groups. Data analyses used one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression analysis, and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: We found that, with respect to dentist-patient communication, patients in the 'patient better' group (i.e., the patient's evaluation was more positive than the dentist's evaluation) were more likely to have a positive outcome (e.g., 'improvement of health and fear,' 'satisfaction with care') than those in the other two groups. Patients in the 'doctor better' group (i.e., the dentist's evaluation was the more positive) were more likely to have a negative outcome than those in the other two groups. Conclusions: A positive patient outcome is more likely when the patient's evaluation is better than a dentist's evaluation with respect to dentist-patient communicative behaviours. The method based on patient and dentist perceptions with respect to dentist-patient communication might be effective in evaluating dentist-patient communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83255161960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83255161960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1922/CDH_2589Hagihara06

DO - 10.1922/CDH_2589Hagihara06

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 274

EP - 279

JO - Community Dental Health

JF - Community Dental Health

SN - 0265-539X

IS - 4

ER -