Assessment and validation of density functional approximations for iron carbide and iron carbide cation

Ruifang Li, Roberto Peverati, Miho Isegawa, Donald G. Truhlar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using quantum chemical approximations to understand and predict complex transition metal chemistry, such as catalytic processes and materials properties, is an important activity in modern computational chemistry. High-level theory can sometimes provide high-precision benchmarks for systems containing transition metals, and these benchmarks can be used to understand the reliability of less expensive quantum chemical approximations that are applicable to complex systems. Here, we studied the ionization potential energy of Fe and FeC and the bond dissociation energies of FeC and FeC+ by 15 density functional approximations: M05, M06, M06-L, ωB97, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, τ-HCTHhyb, BLYP, B3LYP, M08-HX, M08-SO, SOGGA11, SOGGA11-X, M11, and M11-L. All of the functionals predict the correct spin state as the ground state of neutral iron atom, but five of them predict the wrong spin state for Fe+. In the final analysis, four functionals, namely M11-L, τ-HCTHhyb, SOGGA11, and M06-L, have small mean unsigned errors when averaged over two bond dissociation energies and two ionization potentials. In fact, the results show that M11-L gives the smallest averaged mean unsigned error, i.e., M11-L is the most reliable density functional for these iron carbide systems among those studied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-173
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 10 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ionization potential
carbides
Transition metals
Cations
Computational chemistry
iron
cations
functionals
ionization potentials
Potential energy
transition metals
approximation
dissociation
Ground state
computational chemistry
Large scale systems
Materials properties
Iron
complex systems
Atoms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Assessment and validation of density functional approximations for iron carbide and iron carbide cation. / Li, Ruifang; Peverati, Roberto; Isegawa, Miho; Truhlar, Donald G.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 117, No. 1, 10.01.2013, p. 169-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0af26b04fba64f93a7d058ddd17dfbe3,
title = "Assessment and validation of density functional approximations for iron carbide and iron carbide cation",
abstract = "Using quantum chemical approximations to understand and predict complex transition metal chemistry, such as catalytic processes and materials properties, is an important activity in modern computational chemistry. High-level theory can sometimes provide high-precision benchmarks for systems containing transition metals, and these benchmarks can be used to understand the reliability of less expensive quantum chemical approximations that are applicable to complex systems. Here, we studied the ionization potential energy of Fe and FeC and the bond dissociation energies of FeC and FeC+ by 15 density functional approximations: M05, M06, M06-L, ωB97, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, τ-HCTHhyb, BLYP, B3LYP, M08-HX, M08-SO, SOGGA11, SOGGA11-X, M11, and M11-L. All of the functionals predict the correct spin state as the ground state of neutral iron atom, but five of them predict the wrong spin state for Fe+. In the final analysis, four functionals, namely M11-L, τ-HCTHhyb, SOGGA11, and M06-L, have small mean unsigned errors when averaged over two bond dissociation energies and two ionization potentials. In fact, the results show that M11-L gives the smallest averaged mean unsigned error, i.e., M11-L is the most reliable density functional for these iron carbide systems among those studied.",
author = "Ruifang Li and Roberto Peverati and Miho Isegawa and Truhlar, {Donald G.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1021/jp3079106",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "169--173",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry A",
issn = "1089-5639",
publisher = "ACS Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment and validation of density functional approximations for iron carbide and iron carbide cation

AU - Li, Ruifang

AU - Peverati, Roberto

AU - Isegawa, Miho

AU - Truhlar, Donald G.

PY - 2013/1/10

Y1 - 2013/1/10

N2 - Using quantum chemical approximations to understand and predict complex transition metal chemistry, such as catalytic processes and materials properties, is an important activity in modern computational chemistry. High-level theory can sometimes provide high-precision benchmarks for systems containing transition metals, and these benchmarks can be used to understand the reliability of less expensive quantum chemical approximations that are applicable to complex systems. Here, we studied the ionization potential energy of Fe and FeC and the bond dissociation energies of FeC and FeC+ by 15 density functional approximations: M05, M06, M06-L, ωB97, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, τ-HCTHhyb, BLYP, B3LYP, M08-HX, M08-SO, SOGGA11, SOGGA11-X, M11, and M11-L. All of the functionals predict the correct spin state as the ground state of neutral iron atom, but five of them predict the wrong spin state for Fe+. In the final analysis, four functionals, namely M11-L, τ-HCTHhyb, SOGGA11, and M06-L, have small mean unsigned errors when averaged over two bond dissociation energies and two ionization potentials. In fact, the results show that M11-L gives the smallest averaged mean unsigned error, i.e., M11-L is the most reliable density functional for these iron carbide systems among those studied.

AB - Using quantum chemical approximations to understand and predict complex transition metal chemistry, such as catalytic processes and materials properties, is an important activity in modern computational chemistry. High-level theory can sometimes provide high-precision benchmarks for systems containing transition metals, and these benchmarks can be used to understand the reliability of less expensive quantum chemical approximations that are applicable to complex systems. Here, we studied the ionization potential energy of Fe and FeC and the bond dissociation energies of FeC and FeC+ by 15 density functional approximations: M05, M06, M06-L, ωB97, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, τ-HCTHhyb, BLYP, B3LYP, M08-HX, M08-SO, SOGGA11, SOGGA11-X, M11, and M11-L. All of the functionals predict the correct spin state as the ground state of neutral iron atom, but five of them predict the wrong spin state for Fe+. In the final analysis, four functionals, namely M11-L, τ-HCTHhyb, SOGGA11, and M06-L, have small mean unsigned errors when averaged over two bond dissociation energies and two ionization potentials. In fact, the results show that M11-L gives the smallest averaged mean unsigned error, i.e., M11-L is the most reliable density functional for these iron carbide systems among those studied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872311159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872311159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jp3079106

DO - 10.1021/jp3079106

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 169

EP - 173

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

SN - 1089-5639

IS - 1

ER -