Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: Automated measurements

Choirul Anam, Wahyu Setia Budi, Kusworo Adi, Heri Sutanto, Freddy Haryanto, Mohd Hanafi Ali, Toshioh Fujibuchi, Geoff Dougherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We investigated comparisons between patient dose and noise in pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and head CT images using an automatic method. 113 patient images (37 pelvis, 34 abdominal, 25 thoracic, and 17 head examinations) were retrospectively and automatically examined in this study. Water-equivalent diameter (Dw), size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and noise were automatically calculated from the center slice for every patient image. The Dw was calculated based on auto-contouring of the patients' edges, and the SSDE was calculated as the product of the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the size conversion factor based on the Dw obtained from AAPM 204. The noise was automatically measured as a minimum standard deviation in the map of standard deviations. A square region of interest of about 1 cm2 was used in the automated noise measurement. The SSDE values for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 21.8 ± 7.3 mGy, 22.0 ± 4.5 mGy, 21.5 ± 4.7 mGy, and 65.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively. The SSDEs for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax increased linearly with increasing Dw, and for the head with constant tube current, the SSDE decreased with increasing Dw. The noise in the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 5.9 ± 1.5 HU, 5.2 ± 1.4 HU, 4.9 ± 0.8 HU and 3.9 ± 0.2 HU, respectively. The noise levels for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax of the patients were relatively constant with Dw because of tube current modulation. The noise in the head image was also relatively constant because Dw variations in the head are very small. The automated approach provides a convenient and objective tool for dose optimizations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)783-793
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Radiological Protection
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 5 2019

Fingerprint

Noise
Head
Pelvis
Thorax
Abdomen
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
noise level
dose
medicine
Communication
Medicine
communication
Water
water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Anam, C., Budi, W. S., Adi, K., Sutanto, H., Haryanto, F., Ali, M. H., ... Dougherty, G. (2019). Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: Automated measurements. Journal of Radiological Protection, 39(3), 783-793. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc

Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images : Automated measurements. / Anam, Choirul; Budi, Wahyu Setia; Adi, Kusworo; Sutanto, Heri; Haryanto, Freddy; Ali, Mohd Hanafi; Fujibuchi, Toshioh; Dougherty, Geoff.

In: Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 39, No. 3, 05.07.2019, p. 783-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anam, Choirul ; Budi, Wahyu Setia ; Adi, Kusworo ; Sutanto, Heri ; Haryanto, Freddy ; Ali, Mohd Hanafi ; Fujibuchi, Toshioh ; Dougherty, Geoff. / Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images : Automated measurements. In: Journal of Radiological Protection. 2019 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 783-793.
@article{6c078497a39a4c2089b95034a27e54d0,
title = "Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: Automated measurements",
abstract = "We investigated comparisons between patient dose and noise in pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and head CT images using an automatic method. 113 patient images (37 pelvis, 34 abdominal, 25 thoracic, and 17 head examinations) were retrospectively and automatically examined in this study. Water-equivalent diameter (Dw), size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and noise were automatically calculated from the center slice for every patient image. The Dw was calculated based on auto-contouring of the patients' edges, and the SSDE was calculated as the product of the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the size conversion factor based on the Dw obtained from AAPM 204. The noise was automatically measured as a minimum standard deviation in the map of standard deviations. A square region of interest of about 1 cm2 was used in the automated noise measurement. The SSDE values for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 21.8 ± 7.3 mGy, 22.0 ± 4.5 mGy, 21.5 ± 4.7 mGy, and 65.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively. The SSDEs for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax increased linearly with increasing Dw, and for the head with constant tube current, the SSDE decreased with increasing Dw. The noise in the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 5.9 ± 1.5 HU, 5.2 ± 1.4 HU, 4.9 ± 0.8 HU and 3.9 ± 0.2 HU, respectively. The noise levels for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax of the patients were relatively constant with Dw because of tube current modulation. The noise in the head image was also relatively constant because Dw variations in the head are very small. The automated approach provides a convenient and objective tool for dose optimizations.",
author = "Choirul Anam and Budi, {Wahyu Setia} and Kusworo Adi and Heri Sutanto and Freddy Haryanto and Ali, {Mohd Hanafi} and Toshioh Fujibuchi and Geoff Dougherty",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "783--793",
journal = "Journal of Radiological Protection",
issn = "0952-4746",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images

T2 - Automated measurements

AU - Anam, Choirul

AU - Budi, Wahyu Setia

AU - Adi, Kusworo

AU - Sutanto, Heri

AU - Haryanto, Freddy

AU - Ali, Mohd Hanafi

AU - Fujibuchi, Toshioh

AU - Dougherty, Geoff

PY - 2019/7/5

Y1 - 2019/7/5

N2 - We investigated comparisons between patient dose and noise in pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and head CT images using an automatic method. 113 patient images (37 pelvis, 34 abdominal, 25 thoracic, and 17 head examinations) were retrospectively and automatically examined in this study. Water-equivalent diameter (Dw), size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and noise were automatically calculated from the center slice for every patient image. The Dw was calculated based on auto-contouring of the patients' edges, and the SSDE was calculated as the product of the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the size conversion factor based on the Dw obtained from AAPM 204. The noise was automatically measured as a minimum standard deviation in the map of standard deviations. A square region of interest of about 1 cm2 was used in the automated noise measurement. The SSDE values for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 21.8 ± 7.3 mGy, 22.0 ± 4.5 mGy, 21.5 ± 4.7 mGy, and 65.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively. The SSDEs for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax increased linearly with increasing Dw, and for the head with constant tube current, the SSDE decreased with increasing Dw. The noise in the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 5.9 ± 1.5 HU, 5.2 ± 1.4 HU, 4.9 ± 0.8 HU and 3.9 ± 0.2 HU, respectively. The noise levels for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax of the patients were relatively constant with Dw because of tube current modulation. The noise in the head image was also relatively constant because Dw variations in the head are very small. The automated approach provides a convenient and objective tool for dose optimizations.

AB - We investigated comparisons between patient dose and noise in pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and head CT images using an automatic method. 113 patient images (37 pelvis, 34 abdominal, 25 thoracic, and 17 head examinations) were retrospectively and automatically examined in this study. Water-equivalent diameter (Dw), size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and noise were automatically calculated from the center slice for every patient image. The Dw was calculated based on auto-contouring of the patients' edges, and the SSDE was calculated as the product of the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the size conversion factor based on the Dw obtained from AAPM 204. The noise was automatically measured as a minimum standard deviation in the map of standard deviations. A square region of interest of about 1 cm2 was used in the automated noise measurement. The SSDE values for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 21.8 ± 7.3 mGy, 22.0 ± 4.5 mGy, 21.5 ± 4.7 mGy, and 65.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively. The SSDEs for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax increased linearly with increasing Dw, and for the head with constant tube current, the SSDE decreased with increasing Dw. The noise in the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 5.9 ± 1.5 HU, 5.2 ± 1.4 HU, 4.9 ± 0.8 HU and 3.9 ± 0.2 HU, respectively. The noise levels for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax of the patients were relatively constant with Dw because of tube current modulation. The noise in the head image was also relatively constant because Dw variations in the head are very small. The automated approach provides a convenient and objective tool for dose optimizations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071166153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071166153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc

DO - 10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc

M3 - Article

C2 - 31117064

AN - SCOPUS:85071166153

VL - 39

SP - 783

EP - 793

JO - Journal of Radiological Protection

JF - Journal of Radiological Protection

SN - 0952-4746

IS - 3

ER -