Attitudes toward autopsy in unexpected death: A nationwide survey of physicians and risk managers in Japanese teaching hospitals

Etsuko Kamishiraki, Shoichi Maeda, Jay Starkey, Noriaki Ikeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the manner and cause of death in unexpected patient death. The information about the opinions of physicians and risk managers in Japan regarding autopsy is limited. Objective: To describe and evaluate the opinions of physicians and risk managers at Japanese teaching hospitals regarding forensic autopsy. Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional study of all residency programme directors and risk managers completing a survey In January 2009. Specific clinical scenarios where autopsy would be essential to determine whether medical error occurred and whether medical care contributed to the death of the patient were presented. Respondents gave their opinion regarding the necessity of autopsy and their beliefs about if they would actually recommend it. Results: Of 1113 eligible physicians and 1113 eligible chief risk management officers, 466 physicians (41.9%) and 599 risk managers (53.8%) responded. The majority of physicians and risk managers reported they would recommend an autopsy in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death; however, 10% or more of physicians and 25% or more of risk managers (depending on the situation) reported that they would not recommend an autopsy. Risk managers were less likely than physicians to recommend and believe that autopsy was necessary. Conclusions: The majority of physicians and risk managers in Japan would recommend autopsy and believe in its necessity in cases of unexpected patient death.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalMedicine, Science and the Law
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Teaching Hospitals
Autopsy
physician
manager
death
Physicians
Teaching
Medical Errors
medical care
Japan
Surveys and Questionnaires
cause of death
Risk Management
cross-sectional study
risk management
Internship and Residency
director
Cause of Death
Patient Care
scenario

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy
  • Law

Cite this

Attitudes toward autopsy in unexpected death : A nationwide survey of physicians and risk managers in Japanese teaching hospitals. / Kamishiraki, Etsuko; Maeda, Shoichi; Starkey, Jay; Ikeda, Noriaki.

In: Medicine, Science and the Law, Vol. 50, No. 2, 01.04.2010, p. 60-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d59e6b3885f4707857ad28143211257,
title = "Attitudes toward autopsy in unexpected death: A nationwide survey of physicians and risk managers in Japanese teaching hospitals",
abstract = "Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the manner and cause of death in unexpected patient death. The information about the opinions of physicians and risk managers in Japan regarding autopsy is limited. Objective: To describe and evaluate the opinions of physicians and risk managers at Japanese teaching hospitals regarding forensic autopsy. Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional study of all residency programme directors and risk managers completing a survey In January 2009. Specific clinical scenarios where autopsy would be essential to determine whether medical error occurred and whether medical care contributed to the death of the patient were presented. Respondents gave their opinion regarding the necessity of autopsy and their beliefs about if they would actually recommend it. Results: Of 1113 eligible physicians and 1113 eligible chief risk management officers, 466 physicians (41.9{\%}) and 599 risk managers (53.8{\%}) responded. The majority of physicians and risk managers reported they would recommend an autopsy in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death; however, 10{\%} or more of physicians and 25{\%} or more of risk managers (depending on the situation) reported that they would not recommend an autopsy. Risk managers were less likely than physicians to recommend and believe that autopsy was necessary. Conclusions: The majority of physicians and risk managers in Japan would recommend autopsy and believe in its necessity in cases of unexpected patient death.",
author = "Etsuko Kamishiraki and Shoichi Maeda and Jay Starkey and Noriaki Ikeda",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1258/msl.2010.010004",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "60--66",
journal = "Medicine, Science and the Law",
issn = "0025-8024",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward autopsy in unexpected death

T2 - A nationwide survey of physicians and risk managers in Japanese teaching hospitals

AU - Kamishiraki, Etsuko

AU - Maeda, Shoichi

AU - Starkey, Jay

AU - Ikeda, Noriaki

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the manner and cause of death in unexpected patient death. The information about the opinions of physicians and risk managers in Japan regarding autopsy is limited. Objective: To describe and evaluate the opinions of physicians and risk managers at Japanese teaching hospitals regarding forensic autopsy. Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional study of all residency programme directors and risk managers completing a survey In January 2009. Specific clinical scenarios where autopsy would be essential to determine whether medical error occurred and whether medical care contributed to the death of the patient were presented. Respondents gave their opinion regarding the necessity of autopsy and their beliefs about if they would actually recommend it. Results: Of 1113 eligible physicians and 1113 eligible chief risk management officers, 466 physicians (41.9%) and 599 risk managers (53.8%) responded. The majority of physicians and risk managers reported they would recommend an autopsy in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death; however, 10% or more of physicians and 25% or more of risk managers (depending on the situation) reported that they would not recommend an autopsy. Risk managers were less likely than physicians to recommend and believe that autopsy was necessary. Conclusions: The majority of physicians and risk managers in Japan would recommend autopsy and believe in its necessity in cases of unexpected patient death.

AB - Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the manner and cause of death in unexpected patient death. The information about the opinions of physicians and risk managers in Japan regarding autopsy is limited. Objective: To describe and evaluate the opinions of physicians and risk managers at Japanese teaching hospitals regarding forensic autopsy. Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional study of all residency programme directors and risk managers completing a survey In January 2009. Specific clinical scenarios where autopsy would be essential to determine whether medical error occurred and whether medical care contributed to the death of the patient were presented. Respondents gave their opinion regarding the necessity of autopsy and their beliefs about if they would actually recommend it. Results: Of 1113 eligible physicians and 1113 eligible chief risk management officers, 466 physicians (41.9%) and 599 risk managers (53.8%) responded. The majority of physicians and risk managers reported they would recommend an autopsy in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death; however, 10% or more of physicians and 25% or more of risk managers (depending on the situation) reported that they would not recommend an autopsy. Risk managers were less likely than physicians to recommend and believe that autopsy was necessary. Conclusions: The majority of physicians and risk managers in Japan would recommend autopsy and believe in its necessity in cases of unexpected patient death.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954916971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954916971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1258/msl.2010.010004

DO - 10.1258/msl.2010.010004

M3 - Article

C2 - 20593596

AN - SCOPUS:77954916971

VL - 50

SP - 60

EP - 66

JO - Medicine, Science and the Law

JF - Medicine, Science and the Law

SN - 0025-8024

IS - 2

ER -