Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

Yuan Ma, Hideki Mizuuchi, Tetsuro Ushio, Satoshi Hamai, Yukio Akasaki, Koji Murakami, Yasuharu Nakashima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi’s Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi’s Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis. Methods: Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi’s Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis). Results: The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were − 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi’s Line), − 4.2° ± 7.7°/− 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), − 5.1° ± 7.9°/− 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, − 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively. Conclusions: Akagi’s Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi’s Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes. Levels of evidence: III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1570-1579
Number of pages10
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Knee
Metatarsus
Joints
Posterior Cruciate Ligament
Tibia
Tomography
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{4e235694ccca4ecc8e2e3e0261d88cfc,
title = "Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi’s Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi’s Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis. Methods: Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi’s Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis). Results: The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were − 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi’s Line), − 4.2° ± 7.7°/− 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), − 5.1° ± 7.9°/− 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, − 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively. Conclusions: Akagi’s Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi’s Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes. Levels of evidence: III.",
author = "Yuan Ma and Hideki Mizuuchi and Tetsuro Ushio and Satoshi Hamai and Yukio Akasaki and Koji Murakami and Yasuharu Nakashima",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-018-5052-x",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1570--1579",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

AU - Ma, Yuan

AU - Mizuuchi, Hideki

AU - Ushio, Tetsuro

AU - Hamai, Satoshi

AU - Akasaki, Yukio

AU - Murakami, Koji

AU - Nakashima, Yasuharu

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi’s Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi’s Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis. Methods: Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi’s Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis). Results: The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were − 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi’s Line), − 4.2° ± 7.7°/− 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), − 5.1° ± 7.9°/− 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, − 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively. Conclusions: Akagi’s Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi’s Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes. Levels of evidence: III.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi’s Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi’s Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis. Methods: Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi’s Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis). Results: The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were − 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi’s Line), − 4.2° ± 7.7°/− 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), − 5.1° ± 7.9°/− 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, − 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively. Conclusions: Akagi’s Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi’s Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes. Levels of evidence: III.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049668774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049668774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-018-5052-x

DO - 10.1007/s00167-018-5052-x

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1570

EP - 1579

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 5

ER -