Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along theGeorgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of theGeorgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community.The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result isthe creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what waspreviously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this borderand dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within thecontext of Georgia's borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereigntyand the status of borders in the contemporary world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalEurasia Border Review
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

sovereignty
livelihood
Russia
community

Cite this

Borderization in Georgia : Sovereignty Materialized. / Boyle, Edward.

In: Eurasia Border Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03803b7bd0b948af93614e8b261a25fb,
title = "Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized",
abstract = "This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along theGeorgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of theGeorgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community.The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result isthe creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what waspreviously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this borderand dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within thecontext of Georgia's borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereigntyand the status of borders in the contemporary world.",
author = "Edward Boyle",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.14943/ebr.7.1.1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Eurasia Border Review",
issn = "1884-9466",
publisher = "Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, Hokkaido University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Borderization in Georgia

T2 - Sovereignty Materialized

AU - Boyle, Edward

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along theGeorgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of theGeorgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community.The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result isthe creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what waspreviously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this borderand dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within thecontext of Georgia's borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereigntyand the status of borders in the contemporary world.

AB - This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along theGeorgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of theGeorgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community.The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result isthe creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what waspreviously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this borderand dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within thecontext of Georgia's borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereigntyand the status of borders in the contemporary world.

U2 - 10.14943/ebr.7.1.1

DO - 10.14943/ebr.7.1.1

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Eurasia Border Review

JF - Eurasia Border Review

SN - 1884-9466

IS - 1

ER -