Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment

Hiroyuki Otani, Tatsuya Morita, Taito Esaki, hiroshi ariyama, Koichiro Tsukasa, Akira Oshima, Keiko Shiraisi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment to patients is a difficult task. The primary aim of this study was to clarify the level of oncologist-reported burden when communicating about discontinuation of an anticancer treatment. The secondary aims were (i) to identify the sources of burden contributing to their levels and (ii) to explore the useful strategies to alleviate their burden. Methods: A multicenter nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted on 620 oncologists across Japan (response rate, 67%). Results: High levels of perceived burden were reported by 47% of respondents, and 17% reported that they sometimes, often or always wanted to stop oncology work because of this burden. There was a significant association between high levels of burden and: a feeling that breaking bad news would deprive the patient of hope; concern that the patient's family would blame the oncologist; concern that the patient may lose self-control; and a feeling that there was not enough time to break the bad news. Strategies perceived to be useful by oncologists included training in how to effectively communicate to patients discontinuation of anticancer treatment, a reduction in total workload to allow sufficient time to break bad news, and development of a multidisciplinary model to facilitate cooperation with other professionals and facilities. Conclusions: Many oncologists reported high levels of burden relating to communication of discontinuation of anticancer treatment. A specific communication skills training program, sufficient time for communication and development of a multidisciplinary model could help alleviate the burden on oncologists.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberhyr092
Pages (from-to)999-1006
Number of pages8
JournalJapanese journal of clinical oncology
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Communication
Hope
Emotions
Therapeutics
Workload
Oncologists
Japan
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Self-Control

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Otani, H., Morita, T., Esaki, T., ariyama, H., Tsukasa, K., Oshima, A., & Shiraisi, K. (2011). Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment. Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 41(8), 999-1006. [hyr092]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr092

Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment. / Otani, Hiroyuki; Morita, Tatsuya; Esaki, Taito; ariyama, hiroshi; Tsukasa, Koichiro; Oshima, Akira; Shiraisi, Keiko.

In: Japanese journal of clinical oncology, Vol. 41, No. 8, hyr092, 01.08.2011, p. 999-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Otani, H, Morita, T, Esaki, T, ariyama, H, Tsukasa, K, Oshima, A & Shiraisi, K 2011, 'Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment', Japanese journal of clinical oncology, vol. 41, no. 8, hyr092, pp. 999-1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr092
Otani, Hiroyuki ; Morita, Tatsuya ; Esaki, Taito ; ariyama, hiroshi ; Tsukasa, Koichiro ; Oshima, Akira ; Shiraisi, Keiko. / Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment. In: Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2011 ; Vol. 41, No. 8. pp. 999-1006.
@article{d83ce14a707a45fe90c11671f6626097,
title = "Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment",
abstract = "Objective: Communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment to patients is a difficult task. The primary aim of this study was to clarify the level of oncologist-reported burden when communicating about discontinuation of an anticancer treatment. The secondary aims were (i) to identify the sources of burden contributing to their levels and (ii) to explore the useful strategies to alleviate their burden. Methods: A multicenter nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted on 620 oncologists across Japan (response rate, 67{\%}). Results: High levels of perceived burden were reported by 47{\%} of respondents, and 17{\%} reported that they sometimes, often or always wanted to stop oncology work because of this burden. There was a significant association between high levels of burden and: a feeling that breaking bad news would deprive the patient of hope; concern that the patient's family would blame the oncologist; concern that the patient may lose self-control; and a feeling that there was not enough time to break the bad news. Strategies perceived to be useful by oncologists included training in how to effectively communicate to patients discontinuation of anticancer treatment, a reduction in total workload to allow sufficient time to break bad news, and development of a multidisciplinary model to facilitate cooperation with other professionals and facilities. Conclusions: Many oncologists reported high levels of burden relating to communication of discontinuation of anticancer treatment. A specific communication skills training program, sufficient time for communication and development of a multidisciplinary model could help alleviate the burden on oncologists.",
author = "Hiroyuki Otani and Tatsuya Morita and Taito Esaki and hiroshi ariyama and Koichiro Tsukasa and Akira Oshima and Keiko Shiraisi",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jjco/hyr092",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "999--1006",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0368-2811",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment

AU - Otani, Hiroyuki

AU - Morita, Tatsuya

AU - Esaki, Taito

AU - ariyama, hiroshi

AU - Tsukasa, Koichiro

AU - Oshima, Akira

AU - Shiraisi, Keiko

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objective: Communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment to patients is a difficult task. The primary aim of this study was to clarify the level of oncologist-reported burden when communicating about discontinuation of an anticancer treatment. The secondary aims were (i) to identify the sources of burden contributing to their levels and (ii) to explore the useful strategies to alleviate their burden. Methods: A multicenter nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted on 620 oncologists across Japan (response rate, 67%). Results: High levels of perceived burden were reported by 47% of respondents, and 17% reported that they sometimes, often or always wanted to stop oncology work because of this burden. There was a significant association between high levels of burden and: a feeling that breaking bad news would deprive the patient of hope; concern that the patient's family would blame the oncologist; concern that the patient may lose self-control; and a feeling that there was not enough time to break the bad news. Strategies perceived to be useful by oncologists included training in how to effectively communicate to patients discontinuation of anticancer treatment, a reduction in total workload to allow sufficient time to break bad news, and development of a multidisciplinary model to facilitate cooperation with other professionals and facilities. Conclusions: Many oncologists reported high levels of burden relating to communication of discontinuation of anticancer treatment. A specific communication skills training program, sufficient time for communication and development of a multidisciplinary model could help alleviate the burden on oncologists.

AB - Objective: Communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment to patients is a difficult task. The primary aim of this study was to clarify the level of oncologist-reported burden when communicating about discontinuation of an anticancer treatment. The secondary aims were (i) to identify the sources of burden contributing to their levels and (ii) to explore the useful strategies to alleviate their burden. Methods: A multicenter nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted on 620 oncologists across Japan (response rate, 67%). Results: High levels of perceived burden were reported by 47% of respondents, and 17% reported that they sometimes, often or always wanted to stop oncology work because of this burden. There was a significant association between high levels of burden and: a feeling that breaking bad news would deprive the patient of hope; concern that the patient's family would blame the oncologist; concern that the patient may lose self-control; and a feeling that there was not enough time to break the bad news. Strategies perceived to be useful by oncologists included training in how to effectively communicate to patients discontinuation of anticancer treatment, a reduction in total workload to allow sufficient time to break bad news, and development of a multidisciplinary model to facilitate cooperation with other professionals and facilities. Conclusions: Many oncologists reported high levels of burden relating to communication of discontinuation of anticancer treatment. A specific communication skills training program, sufficient time for communication and development of a multidisciplinary model could help alleviate the burden on oncologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961094448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961094448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jjco/hyr092

DO - 10.1093/jjco/hyr092

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 999

EP - 1006

JO - Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0368-2811

IS - 8

M1 - hyr092

ER -