TY - JOUR
T1 - Can land use regulations and taxes help mitigate vehicular CO2 emissions? An empirical study of Japanese cities
AU - Iwata, Kazuyuki
AU - Managi, Shunsuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - This study advocates a multi-dimensional urban planning strategy to help combat climate change under local—and not national—policies. However, the literature does not provide adequate guidance to local governments seeking to enhance urbanization and in turn reduce vehicular carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Therefore, this study sheds light on the effects of the following four urban planning instruments on vehicular CO2 emissions: urbanization promoting areas, urbanization control areas, urban planning taxes and property taxes. Using Japanese city-level data from 1990 to 2010, we find that the two urbanization area planning instruments and the urban planning taxes help lower emissions by increasing population density in low-density cities and that property taxes help reduce emissions in high-density cities. However, the increased population density associated with these instruments can lead to other negative outcomes, including increased traffic accidents, increased crime and a decrease in the facility condition index. City governments should consider complementary policies to mitigate such negative outcomes when employing planning instruments aiming to increase population density.
AB - This study advocates a multi-dimensional urban planning strategy to help combat climate change under local—and not national—policies. However, the literature does not provide adequate guidance to local governments seeking to enhance urbanization and in turn reduce vehicular carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Therefore, this study sheds light on the effects of the following four urban planning instruments on vehicular CO2 emissions: urbanization promoting areas, urbanization control areas, urban planning taxes and property taxes. Using Japanese city-level data from 1990 to 2010, we find that the two urbanization area planning instruments and the urban planning taxes help lower emissions by increasing population density in low-density cities and that property taxes help reduce emissions in high-density cities. However, the increased population density associated with these instruments can lead to other negative outcomes, including increased traffic accidents, increased crime and a decrease in the facility condition index. City governments should consider complementary policies to mitigate such negative outcomes when employing planning instruments aiming to increase population density.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958537609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958537609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08111146.2015.1118375
DO - 10.1080/08111146.2015.1118375
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958537609
SN - 0811-1146
VL - 34
SP - 356
EP - 372
JO - Urban Policy and Research
JF - Urban Policy and Research
IS - 4
ER -