Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography

Kiwamu Kamiya, Mamoru Sakakibara, Naoya Asakawa, Shiro Yamada, Takashi Yoshitani, Hiroyuki Iwano, Hiroshi Komatsu, Masanao Naya, Satoru Chiba, Satoshi Yamada, Osamu Manabe, Yasuka Kikuchi, Noriko Oyama-Manabe, Koji Oba, Hiroyuki Tsutsui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured on catheterization is now widely used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR, however, is invasive and carries potential procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability in functionally significant stenosis identified on FFR, between cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI), single-photon emission computed tomography MPI (SPECT-MPI), and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with CAD.

Methods and Results: A total of 25 patients who had at least 1 angiographic stenosis ≥50% on coronary angiography was studied. CMR-MPI, SPECT-MPI and DSE were done before FFR measurement. FFR was measured in all 3 major epicardial coronary arteries. Out of 71 vascular territories excluding 4 territories due to inadequate imaging, 29 (41%) had FFR <0.80. The sensitivity of CMR-MPI was significantly higher than that of SPECT-MPI and DSE (P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CMR-MPI (AUC, 0.92) was significantly greater than for SPECT-MPI (AUC, 0.73; P=0.006) and DSE (AUC, 0.69; P<0.001).

Conclusions: CMR-MPI performed well in the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined according to FFR, and had the highest diagnostic sensitivity among the 3 modalities tested in patients with CAD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2468-2476
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation Journal
Volume78
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stress Echocardiography
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Coronary Stenosis
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Area Under Curve
Coronary Artery Disease
Pathologic Constriction
Coronary Angiography
ROC Curve
Catheterization
Myocardial Ischemia
Blood Vessels
Coronary Vessels

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography. / Kamiya, Kiwamu; Sakakibara, Mamoru; Asakawa, Naoya; Yamada, Shiro; Yoshitani, Takashi; Iwano, Hiroyuki; Komatsu, Hiroshi; Naya, Masanao; Chiba, Satoru; Yamada, Satoshi; Manabe, Osamu; Kikuchi, Yasuka; Oyama-Manabe, Noriko; Oba, Koji; Tsutsui, Hiroyuki.

In: Circulation Journal, Vol. 78, No. 10, 01.01.2014, p. 2468-2476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kamiya, K, Sakakibara, M, Asakawa, N, Yamada, S, Yoshitani, T, Iwano, H, Komatsu, H, Naya, M, Chiba, S, Yamada, S, Manabe, O, Kikuchi, Y, Oyama-Manabe, N, Oba, K & Tsutsui, H 2014, 'Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography', Circulation Journal, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 2468-2476. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1454
Kamiya, Kiwamu ; Sakakibara, Mamoru ; Asakawa, Naoya ; Yamada, Shiro ; Yoshitani, Takashi ; Iwano, Hiroyuki ; Komatsu, Hiroshi ; Naya, Masanao ; Chiba, Satoru ; Yamada, Satoshi ; Manabe, Osamu ; Kikuchi, Yasuka ; Oyama-Manabe, Noriko ; Oba, Koji ; Tsutsui, Hiroyuki. / Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography. In: Circulation Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 2468-2476.
@article{8b573823f278497db6d72288478cd4d2,
title = "Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography",
abstract = "Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured on catheterization is now widely used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR, however, is invasive and carries potential procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability in functionally significant stenosis identified on FFR, between cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI), single-photon emission computed tomography MPI (SPECT-MPI), and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with CAD.Methods and Results: A total of 25 patients who had at least 1 angiographic stenosis ≥50{\%} on coronary angiography was studied. CMR-MPI, SPECT-MPI and DSE were done before FFR measurement. FFR was measured in all 3 major epicardial coronary arteries. Out of 71 vascular territories excluding 4 territories due to inadequate imaging, 29 (41{\%}) had FFR <0.80. The sensitivity of CMR-MPI was significantly higher than that of SPECT-MPI and DSE (P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CMR-MPI (AUC, 0.92) was significantly greater than for SPECT-MPI (AUC, 0.73; P=0.006) and DSE (AUC, 0.69; P<0.001).Conclusions: CMR-MPI performed well in the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined according to FFR, and had the highest diagnostic sensitivity among the 3 modalities tested in patients with CAD.",
author = "Kiwamu Kamiya and Mamoru Sakakibara and Naoya Asakawa and Shiro Yamada and Takashi Yoshitani and Hiroyuki Iwano and Hiroshi Komatsu and Masanao Naya and Satoru Chiba and Satoshi Yamada and Osamu Manabe and Yasuka Kikuchi and Noriko Oyama-Manabe and Koji Oba and Hiroyuki Tsutsui",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1454",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "2468--2476",
journal = "Circulation Journal",
issn = "1346-9843",
publisher = "Japanese Circulation Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery Stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed Tomography and Dobutamine stress echocardiography

AU - Kamiya, Kiwamu

AU - Sakakibara, Mamoru

AU - Asakawa, Naoya

AU - Yamada, Shiro

AU - Yoshitani, Takashi

AU - Iwano, Hiroyuki

AU - Komatsu, Hiroshi

AU - Naya, Masanao

AU - Chiba, Satoru

AU - Yamada, Satoshi

AU - Manabe, Osamu

AU - Kikuchi, Yasuka

AU - Oyama-Manabe, Noriko

AU - Oba, Koji

AU - Tsutsui, Hiroyuki

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured on catheterization is now widely used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR, however, is invasive and carries potential procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability in functionally significant stenosis identified on FFR, between cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI), single-photon emission computed tomography MPI (SPECT-MPI), and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with CAD.Methods and Results: A total of 25 patients who had at least 1 angiographic stenosis ≥50% on coronary angiography was studied. CMR-MPI, SPECT-MPI and DSE were done before FFR measurement. FFR was measured in all 3 major epicardial coronary arteries. Out of 71 vascular territories excluding 4 territories due to inadequate imaging, 29 (41%) had FFR <0.80. The sensitivity of CMR-MPI was significantly higher than that of SPECT-MPI and DSE (P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CMR-MPI (AUC, 0.92) was significantly greater than for SPECT-MPI (AUC, 0.73; P=0.006) and DSE (AUC, 0.69; P<0.001).Conclusions: CMR-MPI performed well in the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined according to FFR, and had the highest diagnostic sensitivity among the 3 modalities tested in patients with CAD.

AB - Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured on catheterization is now widely used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR, however, is invasive and carries potential procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability in functionally significant stenosis identified on FFR, between cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI), single-photon emission computed tomography MPI (SPECT-MPI), and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with CAD.Methods and Results: A total of 25 patients who had at least 1 angiographic stenosis ≥50% on coronary angiography was studied. CMR-MPI, SPECT-MPI and DSE were done before FFR measurement. FFR was measured in all 3 major epicardial coronary arteries. Out of 71 vascular territories excluding 4 territories due to inadequate imaging, 29 (41%) had FFR <0.80. The sensitivity of CMR-MPI was significantly higher than that of SPECT-MPI and DSE (P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CMR-MPI (AUC, 0.92) was significantly greater than for SPECT-MPI (AUC, 0.73; P=0.006) and DSE (AUC, 0.69; P<0.001).Conclusions: CMR-MPI performed well in the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined according to FFR, and had the highest diagnostic sensitivity among the 3 modalities tested in patients with CAD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908237690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908237690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1454

DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1454

M3 - Article

C2 - 25109426

AN - SCOPUS:84908237690

VL - 78

SP - 2468

EP - 2476

JO - Circulation Journal

JF - Circulation Journal

SN - 1346-9843

IS - 10

ER -