TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB
AU - Yamashita, Koichi
AU - Nishiyama, Tomoki
AU - Yokoyama, Takeshi
AU - Abe, Hidehiro
AU - Manabe, Masanobu
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Purpose: To investigate the reliability of cardiac output assessed by arterial pressure waveform (PulseCO™) in comparison with bolus thermodilution measurements in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: 23 patients who underwent OPCAB were enrolled in this study. After premedication with oral diazepam 10 mg, anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl and vecuronium. After induction, radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters were inserted. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by the PulseCO™ and the bolus thermodilution method using the Vigilance™ monitor: 1) after sternotomy, 2) after opening the mediastinum, and 3) at the end of surgery. The PulseCO™ was calibrated initially with cardiac output determined by the thermodilution method after induction of anesthesia. Results: The correlation coefficients between the two techniques at the three measurement periods were: 1) R2 = 0.49, 2) R2 = 0.52, 3) R2 = 0.55. The limits of agreement (bias ± 2 SD of bias) were: 1) 0.71 ± 2.66, 2) 0.30 ± 1.97, 3) 0.76 ± 3.85 L·min-1. Conclusions: Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with cardiac output measured by thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB.
AB - Purpose: To investigate the reliability of cardiac output assessed by arterial pressure waveform (PulseCO™) in comparison with bolus thermodilution measurements in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: 23 patients who underwent OPCAB were enrolled in this study. After premedication with oral diazepam 10 mg, anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl and vecuronium. After induction, radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters were inserted. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by the PulseCO™ and the bolus thermodilution method using the Vigilance™ monitor: 1) after sternotomy, 2) after opening the mediastinum, and 3) at the end of surgery. The PulseCO™ was calibrated initially with cardiac output determined by the thermodilution method after induction of anesthesia. Results: The correlation coefficients between the two techniques at the three measurement periods were: 1) R2 = 0.49, 2) R2 = 0.52, 3) R2 = 0.55. The limits of agreement (bias ± 2 SD of bias) were: 1) 0.71 ± 2.66, 2) 0.30 ± 1.97, 3) 0.76 ± 3.85 L·min-1. Conclusions: Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with cardiac output measured by thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21244503107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21244503107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF03016534
DO - 10.1007/BF03016534
M3 - Article
C2 - 15872133
AN - SCOPUS:21244503107
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 52
SP - 530
EP - 534
JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -