Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB

Koichi Yamashita, Tomoki Nishiyama, Takeshi Yokoyama, Hidehiro Abe, Masanobu Manabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the reliability of cardiac output assessed by arterial pressure waveform (PulseCO™) in comparison with bolus thermodilution measurements in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: 23 patients who underwent OPCAB were enrolled in this study. After premedication with oral diazepam 10 mg, anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl and vecuronium. After induction, radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters were inserted. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by the PulseCO™ and the bolus thermodilution method using the Vigilance™ monitor: 1) after sternotomy, 2) after opening the mediastinum, and 3) at the end of surgery. The PulseCO™ was calibrated initially with cardiac output determined by the thermodilution method after induction of anesthesia. Results: The correlation coefficients between the two techniques at the three measurement periods were: 1) R2 = 0.49, 2) R2 = 0.52, 3) R2 = 0.55. The limits of agreement (bias ± 2 SD of bias) were: 1) 0.71 ± 2.66, 2) 0.30 ± 1.97, 3) 0.76 ± 3.85 L·min-1. Conclusions: Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with cardiac output measured by thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-534
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this