TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical characteristics associated with esophageal motility function
AU - Tanaka, Yoshimasa
AU - Ihara, Eikichi
AU - Nakamura, Kazuhiko
AU - Muta, Kazumasa
AU - Fukaura, Keita
AU - Mukai, Koji
AU - Bai, Xiaopeng
AU - Takayanagi, Ryoichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Background and Aim:: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) affect coordinated esophageal contractility. Recent developments in high-resolution manometry have improved diagnosis of EMDs; however, the etiology of EMDs remains to be determined. This study aimed to determine which clinical characteristics are associated with esophageal motility. Methods:: From May 2013 to July 2014, 97 patients (54 women, 43 men; age, 16-89years) with suspected EMDs were assessed by high-resolution manometry in Kyushu University Hospital. Esophageal motility was evaluated by measuring the distal contractile integral (DCI), basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Data on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Brinkman Index, and blood tests were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results:: Fifty patients were diagnosed as normal, nine with achalasia, twelve with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, four with distal esophageal spasm, one with jackhammer esophagus, six with absent peristalsis, ten with frequent failed peristalsis, and five with weak peristalsis. The median DCI was 1229.0mmHg-s-cm, the median basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 25.3mmHg, and the median IRP was 9.6mmHg. Patients with major motility disorders were excluded from analysis. By multivariate regression analysis, BMI (P=0.029) and total cholesterol (P=0.023) were negatively associated with DCI, while BMI (P=0.007) was negatively associated with IRP and glucose (P=0.044) was positively associated with IRP. Conclusions:: Both BMI and total cholesterol could be highly predictive factors for esophageal body contractility, while BMI and glucose could be predictive factors for lower esophageal sphincter contractile function.
AB - Background and Aim:: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) affect coordinated esophageal contractility. Recent developments in high-resolution manometry have improved diagnosis of EMDs; however, the etiology of EMDs remains to be determined. This study aimed to determine which clinical characteristics are associated with esophageal motility. Methods:: From May 2013 to July 2014, 97 patients (54 women, 43 men; age, 16-89years) with suspected EMDs were assessed by high-resolution manometry in Kyushu University Hospital. Esophageal motility was evaluated by measuring the distal contractile integral (DCI), basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Data on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Brinkman Index, and blood tests were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results:: Fifty patients were diagnosed as normal, nine with achalasia, twelve with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, four with distal esophageal spasm, one with jackhammer esophagus, six with absent peristalsis, ten with frequent failed peristalsis, and five with weak peristalsis. The median DCI was 1229.0mmHg-s-cm, the median basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 25.3mmHg, and the median IRP was 9.6mmHg. Patients with major motility disorders were excluded from analysis. By multivariate regression analysis, BMI (P=0.029) and total cholesterol (P=0.023) were negatively associated with DCI, while BMI (P=0.007) was negatively associated with IRP and glucose (P=0.044) was positively associated with IRP. Conclusions:: Both BMI and total cholesterol could be highly predictive factors for esophageal body contractility, while BMI and glucose could be predictive factors for lower esophageal sphincter contractile function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971301587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971301587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgh.13262
DO - 10.1111/jgh.13262
M3 - Article
C2 - 26670865
AN - SCOPUS:84971301587
SN - 0815-9319
VL - 31
SP - 1133
EP - 1140
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
IS - 6
ER -