TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical impact of detecting low-frequency variants in cell-free DNA on treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer
AU - Mizuno, Kei
AU - Sumiyoshi, Takayuki
AU - Okegawa, Takatsugu
AU - Terada, Naoki
AU - Ishitoya, Satoshi
AU - Miyazaki, Yu
AU - Kojima, Takahiro
AU - Katayama, Hiromichi
AU - Fujimoto, Naohiro
AU - Hatakeyama, Shingo
AU - Shiota, Masaki
AU - Yoshimura, Koji
AU - Matsui, Yoshiyuki
AU - Narita, Shintaro
AU - Matsumoto, Hiroaki
AU - Kurahashi, Ryoma
AU - Kanno, Hidenori
AU - Ito, Katsuhiro
AU - Kimura, Hiroko
AU - Kamiyama, Yuki
AU - Sunada, Takuro
AU - Goto, Takayuki
AU - Kobayashi, Takashi
AU - Yamada, Hitoshi
AU - Tsuchiya, Norihiko
AU - Kamba, Tomomi
AU - Matsuyama, Hideyasu
AU - Habuchi, Tomonori
AU - Eto, Masatoshi
AU - Ohyama, Chikara
AU - Ito, Akihiro
AU - Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
AU - Okuno, Hiroshi
AU - Kamoto, Toshiyuki
AU - Fujimoto, Akihiro
AU - Ogawa, Osamu
AU - Akamatsu, Shusuke
N1 - Funding Information:
M. Shiota reports personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Sanofi and grants from Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. S. Narita reports personal fees from Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Sanofi, Nippon Shinyaku, and Astellas outside the submitted work. N. Tsuchiya reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca Pharma during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. T. Kamba reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. H. Matsuyama reports personal fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Janssen Pharma and grants from Astellas, Baxter, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. M. Eto reports personal fees from MSD, ONO, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, Takeda, Janssen, and Merck and grants from Kissei, Sanofi, Astellas, ONO, Takeda, and Bayer outside the submitted work. T. Kamoto reports grants from Sanofi, other support from Janssen and Astra Zeneca, and grants
Funding Information:
We thank Junko Hirao, Eriko Komaki, and Yukari Maruhashi for their technical support. The super-computing resource was provided by Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo. This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 20H03814 (to S. Akamatsu) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Additional funding sources include Externally Sponsored Research program by AstraZeneca (to S. Akamatsu) and a research grant from Astellas (to S. Akamatsu).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for Cancer Research Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11/15
Y1 - 2021/11/15
N2 - Purpose: Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is expected to drive cancer precision medicine, little is known about the significance of detecting low-frequency variants in circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in castrationresistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to identify genomic profile including low-frequency variants in ctDNA from patients with CRPC and investigate the clinical utility of detecting variants with variant allele frequency (VAF) below 1%. Experimental Design: This prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with CRPC eligible for treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide. We performed targeted sequencing of pretreatment cfDNA and paired leukocyte DNA with molecular barcodes, and ctDNA variants with a VAF ≥0.1% were detected using an in-house pipeline. We investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after different ctDNA fraction cutoffs were applied. Results: One hundred patients were analyzed (median follow-up 10.7 months). We detected deleterious ATM, BRCA2, and TP53 variants even in samples with ctDNA fraction below 2%. When the ctDNA fraction cutoff value of 0.4% was applied, significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients with and without defects in ATM or BRCA2 [HR, 2.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-5.11; P = 0.0091] and TP53 (HR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.60-8.71; P = 0.0014). However, these differences were no longer observed when the ctDNA fraction cutoff value of 2% was applied, and approximately 50% of the samples were classified as ctDNA unquantifiable. Conclusions: Detecting low-frequency ctDNA variants with a VAF <1% is important to identify clinically informative genomic alterations in CRPC.
AB - Purpose: Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is expected to drive cancer precision medicine, little is known about the significance of detecting low-frequency variants in circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in castrationresistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to identify genomic profile including low-frequency variants in ctDNA from patients with CRPC and investigate the clinical utility of detecting variants with variant allele frequency (VAF) below 1%. Experimental Design: This prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with CRPC eligible for treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide. We performed targeted sequencing of pretreatment cfDNA and paired leukocyte DNA with molecular barcodes, and ctDNA variants with a VAF ≥0.1% were detected using an in-house pipeline. We investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after different ctDNA fraction cutoffs were applied. Results: One hundred patients were analyzed (median follow-up 10.7 months). We detected deleterious ATM, BRCA2, and TP53 variants even in samples with ctDNA fraction below 2%. When the ctDNA fraction cutoff value of 0.4% was applied, significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients with and without defects in ATM or BRCA2 [HR, 2.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-5.11; P = 0.0091] and TP53 (HR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.60-8.71; P = 0.0014). However, these differences were no longer observed when the ctDNA fraction cutoff value of 2% was applied, and approximately 50% of the samples were classified as ctDNA unquantifiable. Conclusions: Detecting low-frequency ctDNA variants with a VAF <1% is important to identify clinically informative genomic alterations in CRPC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119921146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119921146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2328
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2328
M3 - Article
C2 - 34526361
AN - SCOPUS:85119921146
VL - 27
SP - 6164
EP - 6173
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
SN - 1078-0432
IS - 22
ER -