Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation

Tsuneaki Takao, Seiji Okada, Yuichiro Morishita, Takeshi Maeda, Kensuke Kubota, Ryosuke Ideta, Eiji Mori, Itaru Yugue, Osamu Kawano, Hiroaki Sakai, Takayoshi Ueta, Keiichiro Shiba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To clarify the influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) on neurological functional recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation Overview of Literature: The biomechanical etiology of traumatic CSCI remains under discussion and its relationship with CSCS is one of the most controversial issues in the clinical management of traumatic CSCI. Methods: To obtain a relatively uniform background, patients non-surgically treated for an acute C3-4 level CSCI without major fracture or dislocation were selected. We analyzed 58 subjects with traumatic CSCI using T2-weighted mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The sagittal diameter of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column, degree of canal stenosis, and neurologic outcomes in motor function, including improvement rate, were assessed. Results: There were no significant relationships between sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their American Spinal Injury Association motor scores at both admission and discharge. Moreover, no significant relationships were observed between the sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their neurological recovery during the following period. Conclusions: No relationships between pre-existing CSCS and neurological outcomes were evident after traumatic CSCI. These results suggest that decompression surgery might not be recommended for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation despite pre-existing CSCS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-542
Number of pages7
JournalAsian Spine Journal
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Spinal Stenosis
Spinal Canal
Spinal Cord Injuries
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Decompression
Cervical Cord
Fracture Dislocation
Nervous System
Pathologic Constriction
Retrospective Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation. / Takao, Tsuneaki; Okada, Seiji; Morishita, Yuichiro; Maeda, Takeshi; Kubota, Kensuke; Ideta, Ryosuke; Mori, Eiji; Yugue, Itaru; Kawano, Osamu; Sakai, Hiroaki; Ueta, Takayoshi; Shiba, Keiichiro.

In: Asian Spine Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.01.2016, p. 536-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takao, T, Okada, S, Morishita, Y, Maeda, T, Kubota, K, Ideta, R, Mori, E, Yugue, I, Kawano, O, Sakai, H, Ueta, T & Shiba, K 2016, 'Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation', Asian Spine Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 536-542. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.536
Takao, Tsuneaki ; Okada, Seiji ; Morishita, Yuichiro ; Maeda, Takeshi ; Kubota, Kensuke ; Ideta, Ryosuke ; Mori, Eiji ; Yugue, Itaru ; Kawano, Osamu ; Sakai, Hiroaki ; Ueta, Takayoshi ; Shiba, Keiichiro. / Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation. In: Asian Spine Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 536-542.
@article{5105073bd67a46b398b9ac6937f0e7cb,
title = "Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To clarify the influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) on neurological functional recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation Overview of Literature: The biomechanical etiology of traumatic CSCI remains under discussion and its relationship with CSCS is one of the most controversial issues in the clinical management of traumatic CSCI. Methods: To obtain a relatively uniform background, patients non-surgically treated for an acute C3-4 level CSCI without major fracture or dislocation were selected. We analyzed 58 subjects with traumatic CSCI using T2-weighted mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The sagittal diameter of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column, degree of canal stenosis, and neurologic outcomes in motor function, including improvement rate, were assessed. Results: There were no significant relationships between sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their American Spinal Injury Association motor scores at both admission and discharge. Moreover, no significant relationships were observed between the sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their neurological recovery during the following period. Conclusions: No relationships between pre-existing CSCS and neurological outcomes were evident after traumatic CSCI. These results suggest that decompression surgery might not be recommended for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation despite pre-existing CSCS.",
author = "Tsuneaki Takao and Seiji Okada and Yuichiro Morishita and Takeshi Maeda and Kensuke Kubota and Ryosuke Ideta and Eiji Mori and Itaru Yugue and Osamu Kawano and Hiroaki Sakai and Takayoshi Ueta and Keiichiro Shiba",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.536",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "536--542",
journal = "Asian Spine Journal",
issn = "1976-1902",
publisher = "Korean Society of Spine Surgery",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis on neurological outcome after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation

AU - Takao, Tsuneaki

AU - Okada, Seiji

AU - Morishita, Yuichiro

AU - Maeda, Takeshi

AU - Kubota, Kensuke

AU - Ideta, Ryosuke

AU - Mori, Eiji

AU - Yugue, Itaru

AU - Kawano, Osamu

AU - Sakai, Hiroaki

AU - Ueta, Takayoshi

AU - Shiba, Keiichiro

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To clarify the influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) on neurological functional recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation Overview of Literature: The biomechanical etiology of traumatic CSCI remains under discussion and its relationship with CSCS is one of the most controversial issues in the clinical management of traumatic CSCI. Methods: To obtain a relatively uniform background, patients non-surgically treated for an acute C3-4 level CSCI without major fracture or dislocation were selected. We analyzed 58 subjects with traumatic CSCI using T2-weighted mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The sagittal diameter of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column, degree of canal stenosis, and neurologic outcomes in motor function, including improvement rate, were assessed. Results: There were no significant relationships between sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their American Spinal Injury Association motor scores at both admission and discharge. Moreover, no significant relationships were observed between the sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their neurological recovery during the following period. Conclusions: No relationships between pre-existing CSCS and neurological outcomes were evident after traumatic CSCI. These results suggest that decompression surgery might not be recommended for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation despite pre-existing CSCS.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To clarify the influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) on neurological functional recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation Overview of Literature: The biomechanical etiology of traumatic CSCI remains under discussion and its relationship with CSCS is one of the most controversial issues in the clinical management of traumatic CSCI. Methods: To obtain a relatively uniform background, patients non-surgically treated for an acute C3-4 level CSCI without major fracture or dislocation were selected. We analyzed 58 subjects with traumatic CSCI using T2-weighted mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The sagittal diameter of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column, degree of canal stenosis, and neurologic outcomes in motor function, including improvement rate, were assessed. Results: There were no significant relationships between sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their American Spinal Injury Association motor scores at both admission and discharge. Moreover, no significant relationships were observed between the sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their neurological recovery during the following period. Conclusions: No relationships between pre-existing CSCS and neurological outcomes were evident after traumatic CSCI. These results suggest that decompression surgery might not be recommended for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation despite pre-existing CSCS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976869632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976869632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.536

DO - 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.536

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84976869632

VL - 10

SP - 536

EP - 542

JO - Asian Spine Journal

JF - Asian Spine Journal

SN - 1976-1902

IS - 3

ER -