Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis - Minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients

Kou Ikuta, Osamu Tono, M. Oga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A clear consensus for the optimal surgical treatment for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) has not appeared. In general, decompression and fusion are recommended. However, the symptoms of spinal stenosis are the main complaints in almost all patients with DS, and whether or not routine concomitant fusion is necessary in the surgical treatment for DS is still discussed controversially. The authors have treated almost all the patients with spinal stenosis associated with DS by microendoscopic posterior decompression (MEPD) procedures since 2001. In the present study, we examined the minimum 2-year outcome in 37 patients surgically treated with the MEPD procedures for spinal stenosis associated with DS. At the mean of 38 months after surgery, the overall results were excellent in 54% of the patients, good in 19%, fair in 13.5%, and poor in 13.5%, based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association lumbar score, a visual analogue scale, and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. Although the progression of spondylolisthesis and the increase of segmental sagittal motion after surgery were seen in 7 patients (19%), only one patient required secondary fusion during the follow-up period. A sufficient decompression with the preservation of the posterior structures of the spine was observed in almost the patients after surgery. In conclusion, the MEPD is a minimally invasive procedure developing a sufficient decompression with the preservation of the spinal stability. Thus, the MEPD is one of the useful procedures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis associated with DS. However, further follow-up studies should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcome for evaluation of the true validity of the MEPD for DS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-271
Number of pages5
JournalMinimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2008

Fingerprint

Spondylolisthesis
Spinal Stenosis
Decompression
Visual Analog Scale
Orthopedics
Spine
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis - Minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients. / Ikuta, Kou; Tono, Osamu; Oga, M.

In: Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.10.2008, p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7898a857c54c4fd796339e15826ce0a7,
title = "Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis - Minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients",
abstract = "A clear consensus for the optimal surgical treatment for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) has not appeared. In general, decompression and fusion are recommended. However, the symptoms of spinal stenosis are the main complaints in almost all patients with DS, and whether or not routine concomitant fusion is necessary in the surgical treatment for DS is still discussed controversially. The authors have treated almost all the patients with spinal stenosis associated with DS by microendoscopic posterior decompression (MEPD) procedures since 2001. In the present study, we examined the minimum 2-year outcome in 37 patients surgically treated with the MEPD procedures for spinal stenosis associated with DS. At the mean of 38 months after surgery, the overall results were excellent in 54{\%} of the patients, good in 19{\%}, fair in 13.5{\%}, and poor in 13.5{\%}, based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association lumbar score, a visual analogue scale, and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. Although the progression of spondylolisthesis and the increase of segmental sagittal motion after surgery were seen in 7 patients (19{\%}), only one patient required secondary fusion during the follow-up period. A sufficient decompression with the preservation of the posterior structures of the spine was observed in almost the patients after surgery. In conclusion, the MEPD is a minimally invasive procedure developing a sufficient decompression with the preservation of the spinal stability. Thus, the MEPD is one of the useful procedures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis associated with DS. However, further follow-up studies should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcome for evaluation of the true validity of the MEPD for DS.",
author = "Kou Ikuta and Osamu Tono and M. Oga",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0028-1082314",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "267--271",
journal = "Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery",
issn = "0946-7211",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis - Minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients

AU - Ikuta, Kou

AU - Tono, Osamu

AU - Oga, M.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - A clear consensus for the optimal surgical treatment for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) has not appeared. In general, decompression and fusion are recommended. However, the symptoms of spinal stenosis are the main complaints in almost all patients with DS, and whether or not routine concomitant fusion is necessary in the surgical treatment for DS is still discussed controversially. The authors have treated almost all the patients with spinal stenosis associated with DS by microendoscopic posterior decompression (MEPD) procedures since 2001. In the present study, we examined the minimum 2-year outcome in 37 patients surgically treated with the MEPD procedures for spinal stenosis associated with DS. At the mean of 38 months after surgery, the overall results were excellent in 54% of the patients, good in 19%, fair in 13.5%, and poor in 13.5%, based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association lumbar score, a visual analogue scale, and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. Although the progression of spondylolisthesis and the increase of segmental sagittal motion after surgery were seen in 7 patients (19%), only one patient required secondary fusion during the follow-up period. A sufficient decompression with the preservation of the posterior structures of the spine was observed in almost the patients after surgery. In conclusion, the MEPD is a minimally invasive procedure developing a sufficient decompression with the preservation of the spinal stability. Thus, the MEPD is one of the useful procedures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis associated with DS. However, further follow-up studies should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcome for evaluation of the true validity of the MEPD for DS.

AB - A clear consensus for the optimal surgical treatment for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) has not appeared. In general, decompression and fusion are recommended. However, the symptoms of spinal stenosis are the main complaints in almost all patients with DS, and whether or not routine concomitant fusion is necessary in the surgical treatment for DS is still discussed controversially. The authors have treated almost all the patients with spinal stenosis associated with DS by microendoscopic posterior decompression (MEPD) procedures since 2001. In the present study, we examined the minimum 2-year outcome in 37 patients surgically treated with the MEPD procedures for spinal stenosis associated with DS. At the mean of 38 months after surgery, the overall results were excellent in 54% of the patients, good in 19%, fair in 13.5%, and poor in 13.5%, based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association lumbar score, a visual analogue scale, and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. Although the progression of spondylolisthesis and the increase of segmental sagittal motion after surgery were seen in 7 patients (19%), only one patient required secondary fusion during the follow-up period. A sufficient decompression with the preservation of the posterior structures of the spine was observed in almost the patients after surgery. In conclusion, the MEPD is a minimally invasive procedure developing a sufficient decompression with the preservation of the spinal stability. Thus, the MEPD is one of the useful procedures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis associated with DS. However, further follow-up studies should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcome for evaluation of the true validity of the MEPD for DS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55549139810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55549139810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0028-1082314

DO - 10.1055/s-0028-1082314

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 267

EP - 271

JO - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

JF - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

SN - 0946-7211

IS - 5

ER -