TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinicopathological significance of light chain deposition in IgA nephropathy
AU - Katafuchi, Ritsuko
AU - Nagae, Hiroshi
AU - Masutani, Kosuke
AU - Nakano, Toshiaki
AU - Munakata, Mikio
AU - Tsuruya, Kazuhiko
AU - Mitsuiki, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Dr. Shigeru Tanaka in the Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, for useful advice concerning statistical analysis. The authors also appreciate Dr. Eisuke Katafuchi, Dr. Satoko Kurata, Professor Toshiyuki Nakayama, Ms. Fusa Murayama in the Second Department of Pathology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, for electron microscopic examination.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Japanese Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Clinicopathological significance of light chain deposition in IgA nephropathy and the relation of monotypic IgA deposition to bone marrow abnormalities are important issues to be clarified. Methods: We retrospectively investigated light chain deposition in 526 patients with IgA nephropathy. We divided the patients into 5 groups according to the balance of intensity of both light chain deposition: lambda monotypic, lambda dominant, polytypic, kappa dominant and kappa monotypic. Clinicopathological parameters were compared among the groups. The relation of monotypic IgA deposition to hematological malignancy was also evaluated. Results: The prevalence of monotypic IgA deposition was 6.3%, 33 patients (21 lambda and 12 kappa). Thirty-two (4.0%) and 10 patients (1.9%) were classified into lambda and kappa dominant groups, respectively. Polytypic IgA deposition was observed in 455 patients (85.7%). Age of onset, age at biopsy, urinary protein creatinine ratio, the percentage of global glomerulosclerosis, and the degree of IgA and C3 deposition were different among the groups. However, there was no gradual difference according to the groups. No patient with monotypic IgA deposition showed hematological abnormality at biopsy and during follow-up. Conclusions: The prevalence of IgA monotypic deposition was extremely low. Clinicopathologically, we could not differentiate patients with monotypic IgA deposition from those with polytypic one and no hematological disorder was documented in patients with monotypic IgA deposition. Whether IgA nephropathy with monotypic IgA deposition and that with polytypic one is the same entity or not, and relation between monotypic IgA deposition and hematological malignancy should be clarified by further investigations.
AB - Background: Clinicopathological significance of light chain deposition in IgA nephropathy and the relation of monotypic IgA deposition to bone marrow abnormalities are important issues to be clarified. Methods: We retrospectively investigated light chain deposition in 526 patients with IgA nephropathy. We divided the patients into 5 groups according to the balance of intensity of both light chain deposition: lambda monotypic, lambda dominant, polytypic, kappa dominant and kappa monotypic. Clinicopathological parameters were compared among the groups. The relation of monotypic IgA deposition to hematological malignancy was also evaluated. Results: The prevalence of monotypic IgA deposition was 6.3%, 33 patients (21 lambda and 12 kappa). Thirty-two (4.0%) and 10 patients (1.9%) were classified into lambda and kappa dominant groups, respectively. Polytypic IgA deposition was observed in 455 patients (85.7%). Age of onset, age at biopsy, urinary protein creatinine ratio, the percentage of global glomerulosclerosis, and the degree of IgA and C3 deposition were different among the groups. However, there was no gradual difference according to the groups. No patient with monotypic IgA deposition showed hematological abnormality at biopsy and during follow-up. Conclusions: The prevalence of IgA monotypic deposition was extremely low. Clinicopathologically, we could not differentiate patients with monotypic IgA deposition from those with polytypic one and no hematological disorder was documented in patients with monotypic IgA deposition. Whether IgA nephropathy with monotypic IgA deposition and that with polytypic one is the same entity or not, and relation between monotypic IgA deposition and hematological malignancy should be clarified by further investigations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101861238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101861238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-021-02026-7
DO - 10.1007/s10157-021-02026-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33646451
AN - SCOPUS:85101861238
SN - 1342-1751
VL - 25
SP - 621
EP - 632
JO - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
IS - 6
ER -