TY - JOUR
T1 - Coevolution of phenotypic plasticity in predator and prey
T2 - Why are inducible offenses rarer than inducible defenses?
AU - Mougi, Akihiko
AU - Kishida, Osamu
AU - Iwasa, Yoh
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - Inducible defenses of prey and inducible offenses of predators are drastic phenotypic changes activated by the interaction between a prey and predator. Inducible defenses occur in many taxa and occur more frequently than inducible offenses. Recent empirical studies have reported reciprocal phenotypic changes in both predator and prey. Here, we model the coevolution of inducible plasticity in both prey and predator, and examine how the evolutionary dynamics of inducible plasticity affect the population dynamics of a predator-prey system. Under a broad range of parameter values, the proportion of predators with an offensive phenotype is smaller than the proportion of prey with a defensive phenotype, and the offense level is relatively lower than the defense level at evolutionary end points. Our model also predicts that inducible plasticity evolves in both species when predation success depends sensitively on the difference in the inducible trait value between the two species. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity may be widespread in nature but may have been overlooked by field studies because offensive phenotypes are rare and inconspicuous.
AB - Inducible defenses of prey and inducible offenses of predators are drastic phenotypic changes activated by the interaction between a prey and predator. Inducible defenses occur in many taxa and occur more frequently than inducible offenses. Recent empirical studies have reported reciprocal phenotypic changes in both predator and prey. Here, we model the coevolution of inducible plasticity in both prey and predator, and examine how the evolutionary dynamics of inducible plasticity affect the population dynamics of a predator-prey system. Under a broad range of parameter values, the proportion of predators with an offensive phenotype is smaller than the proportion of prey with a defensive phenotype, and the offense level is relatively lower than the defense level at evolutionary end points. Our model also predicts that inducible plasticity evolves in both species when predation success depends sensitively on the difference in the inducible trait value between the two species. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity may be widespread in nature but may have been overlooked by field studies because offensive phenotypes are rare and inconspicuous.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953324910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953324910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01187.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01187.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21062279
AN - SCOPUS:79953324910
SN - 0014-3820
VL - 65
SP - 1079
EP - 1087
JO - Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
JF - Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
IS - 4
ER -