Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law

Stefan Wrbka

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

On occasion, lawmakers justify their moves with the argument of enhanced legal certainty. But what does ‘legal certainty’ mean? This chapter explains the certainty concept by taking a look at some more recent European (Union), Austrian and Japanese private law issues. In doing so, it argues that the certainty concept shows various facets that address different legal issues, comprising ideas of inter alia legal clarity, legal stability and legal peace. Although improved legal certainty should generally be welcome, the chapter indicates that an overemphasis of this concept might create some tension with other arguably important considerations – most notably with legal flexibility. The examples given in this analysis illustrate how policy makers try to react to this. Although the strategies taken in the discussed jurisdictions might differ, they all aim to reconcile the interests of natural and legal persons affected by lawmaking.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal Certainty in a Contemporary Context
Subtitle of host publicationPrivate and Criminal Law Perspectives
PublisherSpringer Singapore
Pages9-32
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9789811001147
ISBN (Print)9789811001123
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

private law
jurisdiction
peace
flexibility
human being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Wrbka, S. (2016). Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law. In Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context: Private and Criminal Law Perspectives (pp. 9-32). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2

Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law. / Wrbka, Stefan.

Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context: Private and Criminal Law Perspectives. Springer Singapore, 2016. p. 9-32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wrbka, S 2016, Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law. in Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context: Private and Criminal Law Perspectives. Springer Singapore, pp. 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2
Wrbka S. Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law. In Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context: Private and Criminal Law Perspectives. Springer Singapore. 2016. p. 9-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2
Wrbka, Stefan. / Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law. Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context: Private and Criminal Law Perspectives. Springer Singapore, 2016. pp. 9-32
@inbook{4c1b8fad29e74b5e8bce9a6ec86654a0,
title = "Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law",
abstract = "On occasion, lawmakers justify their moves with the argument of enhanced legal certainty. But what does ‘legal certainty’ mean? This chapter explains the certainty concept by taking a look at some more recent European (Union), Austrian and Japanese private law issues. In doing so, it argues that the certainty concept shows various facets that address different legal issues, comprising ideas of inter alia legal clarity, legal stability and legal peace. Although improved legal certainty should generally be welcome, the chapter indicates that an overemphasis of this concept might create some tension with other arguably important considerations – most notably with legal flexibility. The examples given in this analysis illustrate how policy makers try to react to this. Although the strategies taken in the discussed jurisdictions might differ, they all aim to reconcile the interests of natural and legal persons affected by lawmaking.",
author = "Stefan Wrbka",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811001123",
pages = "9--32",
booktitle = "Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context",
publisher = "Springer Singapore",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Comments on legal certainty from the perspective of European, Austrian and Japanese private law

AU - Wrbka, Stefan

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - On occasion, lawmakers justify their moves with the argument of enhanced legal certainty. But what does ‘legal certainty’ mean? This chapter explains the certainty concept by taking a look at some more recent European (Union), Austrian and Japanese private law issues. In doing so, it argues that the certainty concept shows various facets that address different legal issues, comprising ideas of inter alia legal clarity, legal stability and legal peace. Although improved legal certainty should generally be welcome, the chapter indicates that an overemphasis of this concept might create some tension with other arguably important considerations – most notably with legal flexibility. The examples given in this analysis illustrate how policy makers try to react to this. Although the strategies taken in the discussed jurisdictions might differ, they all aim to reconcile the interests of natural and legal persons affected by lawmaking.

AB - On occasion, lawmakers justify their moves with the argument of enhanced legal certainty. But what does ‘legal certainty’ mean? This chapter explains the certainty concept by taking a look at some more recent European (Union), Austrian and Japanese private law issues. In doing so, it argues that the certainty concept shows various facets that address different legal issues, comprising ideas of inter alia legal clarity, legal stability and legal peace. Although improved legal certainty should generally be welcome, the chapter indicates that an overemphasis of this concept might create some tension with other arguably important considerations – most notably with legal flexibility. The examples given in this analysis illustrate how policy makers try to react to this. Although the strategies taken in the discussed jurisdictions might differ, they all aim to reconcile the interests of natural and legal persons affected by lawmaking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978208677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978208677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-0114-7_2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84978208677

SN - 9789811001123

SP - 9

EP - 32

BT - Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context

PB - Springer Singapore

ER -