Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Tomofumi Miura, Hisashi Noma, Toshi A. Furukawa, Hiroshi Mitsuyasu, Shiro Tanaka, Sarah Stockton, Georgia Salanti, Keisuke Motomura, Satomi Shimano-Katsuki, Stefan Leucht, Andrea Cipriani, John R. Geddes, Shigenobu Kanba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Lithium is the established standard in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder, but several new drugs have been assessed for this indication. We did a network meta-analysis to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of available pharmacological treatment strategies for bipolar disorder. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Medline, PreMedline, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials published before June 28, 2013, that compared active treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo), either as monotherapy or as add-on treatment, for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of participants with recurrence of any mood episode, and the number of participants who discontinued the trial because of adverse events. We assessed efficacy and tolerability of bipolar treatments using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Findings: We screened 114 potentially eligible studies and identified 33 randomised controlled trials, published between 1970 and 2012, that examined 17 treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo) in 6846 participants. Participants assigned to all assessed treatments had a significantly lower risk of any mood relapse or recurrence compared with placebo, except for those assigned to aripiprazole (risk ratio [RR] 0·62, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·38-1·03), carbamazepine (RR 0·68, 0·44-1·06), imipramine (RR 0·95, 0·66-1·36), and paliperidone (RR 0·84, 0·56-1·24). Lamotrigine and placebo were significantly better tolerated than carbamazepine (lamotrigine, RR 5·24, 1·07-26·32; placebo, RR 3·60, 1·04-12·94), lithium (RR 3·76, 1·13-12·66; RR 2·58, 1·33-5·39), or lithium plus valproate (RR 5·95, 1·02-33·33; RR 4·09, 1·01-16·96). Interpretation: Although most of the drugs analysed were more efficacious than placebo and generally well tolerated, differences in the quality of evidence and the side-effect profiles should be taken into consideration by clinicians and patients. In view of the efficacy in prevention of both manic episode and depressive episode relapse or recurrence and the better quality of the supporting evidence, lithium should remain the first-line treatment when prescribing a relapse-prevention drug in patients with bipolar disorder, notwithstanding its tolerability profile. Funding: None.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-359
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Odds Ratio
Pharmacology
Placebos
Lithium
Recurrence
Therapeutics
Carbamazepine
Randomized Controlled Trials
Network Meta-Analysis
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Imipramine
Valproic Acid
Secondary Prevention

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder : A systematic review and network meta-analysis. / Miura, Tomofumi; Noma, Hisashi; Furukawa, Toshi A.; Mitsuyasu, Hiroshi; Tanaka, Shiro; Stockton, Sarah; Salanti, Georgia; Motomura, Keisuke; Shimano-Katsuki, Satomi; Leucht, Stefan; Cipriani, Andrea; Geddes, John R.; Kanba, Shigenobu.

In: The Lancet Psychiatry, Vol. 1, No. 5, 01.10.2014, p. 351-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miura, T, Noma, H, Furukawa, TA, Mitsuyasu, H, Tanaka, S, Stockton, S, Salanti, G, Motomura, K, Shimano-Katsuki, S, Leucht, S, Cipriani, A, Geddes, JR & Kanba, S 2014, 'Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis', The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70314-1
Miura, Tomofumi ; Noma, Hisashi ; Furukawa, Toshi A. ; Mitsuyasu, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Shiro ; Stockton, Sarah ; Salanti, Georgia ; Motomura, Keisuke ; Shimano-Katsuki, Satomi ; Leucht, Stefan ; Cipriani, Andrea ; Geddes, John R. ; Kanba, Shigenobu. / Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder : A systematic review and network meta-analysis. In: The Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 ; Vol. 1, No. 5. pp. 351-359.
@article{d7bc60fae8a04a7d9b0979091a30b938,
title = "Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: Lithium is the established standard in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder, but several new drugs have been assessed for this indication. We did a network meta-analysis to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of available pharmacological treatment strategies for bipolar disorder. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Medline, PreMedline, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials published before June 28, 2013, that compared active treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo), either as monotherapy or as add-on treatment, for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of participants with recurrence of any mood episode, and the number of participants who discontinued the trial because of adverse events. We assessed efficacy and tolerability of bipolar treatments using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Findings: We screened 114 potentially eligible studies and identified 33 randomised controlled trials, published between 1970 and 2012, that examined 17 treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo) in 6846 participants. Participants assigned to all assessed treatments had a significantly lower risk of any mood relapse or recurrence compared with placebo, except for those assigned to aripiprazole (risk ratio [RR] 0·62, 95{\%} credible interval [CrI] 0·38-1·03), carbamazepine (RR 0·68, 0·44-1·06), imipramine (RR 0·95, 0·66-1·36), and paliperidone (RR 0·84, 0·56-1·24). Lamotrigine and placebo were significantly better tolerated than carbamazepine (lamotrigine, RR 5·24, 1·07-26·32; placebo, RR 3·60, 1·04-12·94), lithium (RR 3·76, 1·13-12·66; RR 2·58, 1·33-5·39), or lithium plus valproate (RR 5·95, 1·02-33·33; RR 4·09, 1·01-16·96). Interpretation: Although most of the drugs analysed were more efficacious than placebo and generally well tolerated, differences in the quality of evidence and the side-effect profiles should be taken into consideration by clinicians and patients. In view of the efficacy in prevention of both manic episode and depressive episode relapse or recurrence and the better quality of the supporting evidence, lithium should remain the first-line treatment when prescribing a relapse-prevention drug in patients with bipolar disorder, notwithstanding its tolerability profile. Funding: None.",
author = "Tomofumi Miura and Hisashi Noma and Furukawa, {Toshi A.} and Hiroshi Mitsuyasu and Shiro Tanaka and Sarah Stockton and Georgia Salanti and Keisuke Motomura and Satomi Shimano-Katsuki and Stefan Leucht and Andrea Cipriani and Geddes, {John R.} and Shigenobu Kanba",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70314-1",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "351--359",
journal = "The Lancet Psychiatry",
issn = "2215-0366",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

T2 - A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AU - Miura, Tomofumi

AU - Noma, Hisashi

AU - Furukawa, Toshi A.

AU - Mitsuyasu, Hiroshi

AU - Tanaka, Shiro

AU - Stockton, Sarah

AU - Salanti, Georgia

AU - Motomura, Keisuke

AU - Shimano-Katsuki, Satomi

AU - Leucht, Stefan

AU - Cipriani, Andrea

AU - Geddes, John R.

AU - Kanba, Shigenobu

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Background: Lithium is the established standard in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder, but several new drugs have been assessed for this indication. We did a network meta-analysis to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of available pharmacological treatment strategies for bipolar disorder. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Medline, PreMedline, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials published before June 28, 2013, that compared active treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo), either as monotherapy or as add-on treatment, for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of participants with recurrence of any mood episode, and the number of participants who discontinued the trial because of adverse events. We assessed efficacy and tolerability of bipolar treatments using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Findings: We screened 114 potentially eligible studies and identified 33 randomised controlled trials, published between 1970 and 2012, that examined 17 treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo) in 6846 participants. Participants assigned to all assessed treatments had a significantly lower risk of any mood relapse or recurrence compared with placebo, except for those assigned to aripiprazole (risk ratio [RR] 0·62, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·38-1·03), carbamazepine (RR 0·68, 0·44-1·06), imipramine (RR 0·95, 0·66-1·36), and paliperidone (RR 0·84, 0·56-1·24). Lamotrigine and placebo were significantly better tolerated than carbamazepine (lamotrigine, RR 5·24, 1·07-26·32; placebo, RR 3·60, 1·04-12·94), lithium (RR 3·76, 1·13-12·66; RR 2·58, 1·33-5·39), or lithium plus valproate (RR 5·95, 1·02-33·33; RR 4·09, 1·01-16·96). Interpretation: Although most of the drugs analysed were more efficacious than placebo and generally well tolerated, differences in the quality of evidence and the side-effect profiles should be taken into consideration by clinicians and patients. In view of the efficacy in prevention of both manic episode and depressive episode relapse or recurrence and the better quality of the supporting evidence, lithium should remain the first-line treatment when prescribing a relapse-prevention drug in patients with bipolar disorder, notwithstanding its tolerability profile. Funding: None.

AB - Background: Lithium is the established standard in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder, but several new drugs have been assessed for this indication. We did a network meta-analysis to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of available pharmacological treatment strategies for bipolar disorder. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Medline, PreMedline, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials published before June 28, 2013, that compared active treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo), either as monotherapy or as add-on treatment, for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of participants with recurrence of any mood episode, and the number of participants who discontinued the trial because of adverse events. We assessed efficacy and tolerability of bipolar treatments using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Findings: We screened 114 potentially eligible studies and identified 33 randomised controlled trials, published between 1970 and 2012, that examined 17 treatments for bipolar disorder (or placebo) in 6846 participants. Participants assigned to all assessed treatments had a significantly lower risk of any mood relapse or recurrence compared with placebo, except for those assigned to aripiprazole (risk ratio [RR] 0·62, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·38-1·03), carbamazepine (RR 0·68, 0·44-1·06), imipramine (RR 0·95, 0·66-1·36), and paliperidone (RR 0·84, 0·56-1·24). Lamotrigine and placebo were significantly better tolerated than carbamazepine (lamotrigine, RR 5·24, 1·07-26·32; placebo, RR 3·60, 1·04-12·94), lithium (RR 3·76, 1·13-12·66; RR 2·58, 1·33-5·39), or lithium plus valproate (RR 5·95, 1·02-33·33; RR 4·09, 1·01-16·96). Interpretation: Although most of the drugs analysed were more efficacious than placebo and generally well tolerated, differences in the quality of evidence and the side-effect profiles should be taken into consideration by clinicians and patients. In view of the efficacy in prevention of both manic episode and depressive episode relapse or recurrence and the better quality of the supporting evidence, lithium should remain the first-line treatment when prescribing a relapse-prevention drug in patients with bipolar disorder, notwithstanding its tolerability profile. Funding: None.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919959977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919959977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70314-1

DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70314-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919959977

VL - 1

SP - 351

EP - 359

JO - The Lancet Psychiatry

JF - The Lancet Psychiatry

SN - 2215-0366

IS - 5

ER -