Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement: The Japan environment and Children's study pilot

Mayumi Tsuji, Tadayuki Ayabe, Rie Tanaka, Ayako Senju, Eiji Shibata, Shunsuke Araki, Seiichi Morokuma, Masafumi Sanefuji, Koichi Kusuhara, Toshihiro Kawamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.

Original languageEnglish
Article number28
JournalEnvironmental health and preventive medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Japan
Arm
Heel
Deficiency Diseases
Growth Hormone

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement : The Japan environment and Children's study pilot. / Tsuji, Mayumi; Ayabe, Tadayuki; Tanaka, Rie; Senju, Ayako; Shibata, Eiji; Araki, Shunsuke; Morokuma, Seiichi; Sanefuji, Masafumi; Kusuhara, Koichi; Kawamoto, Toshihiro.

In: Environmental health and preventive medicine, Vol. 22, No. 1, 28, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsuji, Mayumi ; Ayabe, Tadayuki ; Tanaka, Rie ; Senju, Ayako ; Shibata, Eiji ; Araki, Shunsuke ; Morokuma, Seiichi ; Sanefuji, Masafumi ; Kusuhara, Koichi ; Kawamoto, Toshihiro. / Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement : The Japan environment and Children's study pilot. In: Environmental health and preventive medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 1.
@article{daafb85da3d241d39659c4cde432a086,
title = "Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement: The Japan environment and Children's study pilot",
abstract = "Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.",
author = "Mayumi Tsuji and Tadayuki Ayabe and Rie Tanaka and Ayako Senju and Eiji Shibata and Shunsuke Araki and Seiichi Morokuma and Masafumi Sanefuji and Koichi Kusuhara and Toshihiro Kawamoto",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine",
issn = "1342-078X",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement

T2 - The Japan environment and Children's study pilot

AU - Tsuji, Mayumi

AU - Ayabe, Tadayuki

AU - Tanaka, Rie

AU - Senju, Ayako

AU - Shibata, Eiji

AU - Araki, Shunsuke

AU - Morokuma, Seiichi

AU - Sanefuji, Masafumi

AU - Kusuhara, Koichi

AU - Kawamoto, Toshihiro

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.

AB - Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032855345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032855345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9

DO - 10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 29165129

AN - SCOPUS:85032855345

VL - 22

JO - Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

JF - Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

SN - 1342-078X

IS - 1

M1 - 28

ER -