TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing PCR-generated artifacts of different polymerases for improved accuracy of DNA metabarcoding
AU - Nagai, Satoshi
AU - Sildever, Sirje
AU - Nishi, Noriko
AU - Tazawa, Satoshi
AU - Basti, Leila
AU - Kobayashi, Takanori
AU - Ishino, Yoshizumi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank R. Kubota for her assistance with the molecular work. This work was funded by “Technological developments for characterization of harmful plankton in the seawater”, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (16808839) [SN]; JST/JICA, Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (JPMJSA1705) [SN]; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Short-term Postdoctoral Fellowship (PE18028) [SN, SS]; European Regional Development Fund and the programme Mobilitas Plus (MOBTP160) [SS]; Estonian Research Council grant (PSG735) [SS].
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2022 Satoshi Nagai et al.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Accuracy of PCR amplification is vital for obtaining reliable amplicon-sequencing results by metabarcoding. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of error profiles in the PCR products by 14 different PCR kits using a mock eukaryotic community DNA sample mimicking metabarcoding analysis. To prepare a mock eukaryotic community from the marine environment, equal amounts of plasmid DNA from 40 microalgal species were mixed and used for amplicon-sequencing by a high-throughput sequencing approach. To compare the differences in PCR kits used for this experiment, we focused on the following seven parameters: 1) Quality, 2) Chimera, 3) Blast top hit accuracy, 4) Deletion, 5) Insertion, 6) Base substitution and 7) Amplification bias amongst species. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for all of the seven parameters depending on the PCR kits used. These differences may result from the different DNA polymerases included in each kit, although the result can also be influenced by PCR reaction conditions. Simultaneous analysis of several parameters suggested that kits containing KOD plus Neo (TOYOBO) and HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (BiONEER, CA, US) at the annealing temperature of 65 °C displayed better results in terms of parameters associated with chimeras, top hit similarity and deletions.
AB - Accuracy of PCR amplification is vital for obtaining reliable amplicon-sequencing results by metabarcoding. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of error profiles in the PCR products by 14 different PCR kits using a mock eukaryotic community DNA sample mimicking metabarcoding analysis. To prepare a mock eukaryotic community from the marine environment, equal amounts of plasmid DNA from 40 microalgal species were mixed and used for amplicon-sequencing by a high-throughput sequencing approach. To compare the differences in PCR kits used for this experiment, we focused on the following seven parameters: 1) Quality, 2) Chimera, 3) Blast top hit accuracy, 4) Deletion, 5) Insertion, 6) Base substitution and 7) Amplification bias amongst species. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for all of the seven parameters depending on the PCR kits used. These differences may result from the different DNA polymerases included in each kit, although the result can also be influenced by PCR reaction conditions. Simultaneous analysis of several parameters suggested that kits containing KOD plus Neo (TOYOBO) and HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (BiONEER, CA, US) at the annealing temperature of 65 °C displayed better results in terms of parameters associated with chimeras, top hit similarity and deletions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126627168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126627168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3897/MBMG.6.77704
DO - 10.3897/MBMG.6.77704
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126627168
VL - 6
SP - 27
EP - 39
JO - Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
JF - Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
SN - 2534-9708
ER -