Comparison between Richards Growth Function, its family growth functions and basic growth function

Masataka Shimojo, Yutaka Nakano, Manabu Tobisa, Tao Shao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to make a comparison between Richards growth function, its family growth functions and basic growth function. Each growth function was combined with its first and second derivatives. The results obtained were as follows. Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions, each of which was a special case of Richards growth function, took a common form when combined with first and second derivatives. In the case of Richards growth function, there was an additional m when compared with the common form. The present study showed that Richards growth function resulted in its family growth functions when m = 0, and collapsed into basic growth function when m = 1. These were contradictory to the results by Richards (1959), except Mitscherlich growth function that was given when m = 0. There was a gap impossible to jump over between basic growth function and each of Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions. It was suggested that Richards growth function existed between a group of its family growth functions and basic growth function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-76
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University
Volume56
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Comparison between Richards Growth Function, its family growth functions and basic growth function. / Shimojo, Masataka; Nakano, Yutaka; Tobisa, Manabu; Shao, Tao.

In: Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 75-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65ce0dc7bded400db0adf711b563e55d,
title = "Comparison between Richards Growth Function, its family growth functions and basic growth function",
abstract = "This study was designed to make a comparison between Richards growth function, its family growth functions and basic growth function. Each growth function was combined with its first and second derivatives. The results obtained were as follows. Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions, each of which was a special case of Richards growth function, took a common form when combined with first and second derivatives. In the case of Richards growth function, there was an additional m when compared with the common form. The present study showed that Richards growth function resulted in its family growth functions when m = 0, and collapsed into basic growth function when m = 1. These were contradictory to the results by Richards (1959), except Mitscherlich growth function that was given when m = 0. There was a gap impossible to jump over between basic growth function and each of Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions. It was suggested that Richards growth function existed between a group of its family growth functions and basic growth function.",
author = "Masataka Shimojo and Yutaka Nakano and Manabu Tobisa and Tao Shao",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "75--76",
journal = "Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University",
issn = "0023-6152",
publisher = "Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between Richards Growth Function, its family growth functions and basic growth function

AU - Shimojo, Masataka

AU - Nakano, Yutaka

AU - Tobisa, Manabu

AU - Shao, Tao

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - This study was designed to make a comparison between Richards growth function, its family growth functions and basic growth function. Each growth function was combined with its first and second derivatives. The results obtained were as follows. Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions, each of which was a special case of Richards growth function, took a common form when combined with first and second derivatives. In the case of Richards growth function, there was an additional m when compared with the common form. The present study showed that Richards growth function resulted in its family growth functions when m = 0, and collapsed into basic growth function when m = 1. These were contradictory to the results by Richards (1959), except Mitscherlich growth function that was given when m = 0. There was a gap impossible to jump over between basic growth function and each of Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions. It was suggested that Richards growth function existed between a group of its family growth functions and basic growth function.

AB - This study was designed to make a comparison between Richards growth function, its family growth functions and basic growth function. Each growth function was combined with its first and second derivatives. The results obtained were as follows. Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions, each of which was a special case of Richards growth function, took a common form when combined with first and second derivatives. In the case of Richards growth function, there was an additional m when compared with the common form. The present study showed that Richards growth function resulted in its family growth functions when m = 0, and collapsed into basic growth function when m = 1. These were contradictory to the results by Richards (1959), except Mitscherlich growth function that was given when m = 0. There was a gap impossible to jump over between basic growth function and each of Mitscherlich, logistic and Gompertz growth functions. It was suggested that Richards growth function existed between a group of its family growth functions and basic growth function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952942237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952942237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 75

EP - 76

JO - Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University

JF - Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University

SN - 0023-6152

IS - 1

ER -