Comparison of analgesia induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline

Akifumi Kanai, Shintaro Koiso, Sumio Hoka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To compare the extent of sensory block induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to 1% lidocaine. Design: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 40 ASA physical status I inpatients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery. Interventions: After surgery with lumbar epidural anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine, patients were randomized to two postoperative epidural infusion groups to receive plain 1% lidocaine (plain group) or 2% lidocaine diluted with the same volume of normal saline (dilution group). Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 mL/h. Measurements and Main Results: Regression of sensory block was significantly prolonged in the plain group, resulting in a significant difference in the spread of sensory block between the two agents from 4 to 6 h postoperatively. There also was a significant difference from the two groups in the level of motor block (modified Bromage scale) between 3 and 5 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Two percent lidocaine diluted with the same volume of saline is a less potent than the plain 1% lidocaine. The effect of saline as a diluent on epidurally administrated local anesthetics may be of clinical importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-538
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Lidocaine
Analgesia
Epidural Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics
Orthopedics
Inpatients
Lower Extremity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of analgesia induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline. / Kanai, Akifumi; Koiso, Shintaro; Hoka, Sumio.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 19, No. 7, 01.11.2007, p. 534-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d72d1ec97fc47d299437f9ac8ad24ab,
title = "Comparison of analgesia induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1{\%} lidocaine and 1{\%} lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2{\%} lidocaine with the same volume of saline",
abstract = "Study Objective: To compare the extent of sensory block induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1{\%} lidocaine and 2{\%} lidocaine diluted with saline to 1{\%} lidocaine. Design: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 40 ASA physical status I inpatients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery. Interventions: After surgery with lumbar epidural anesthesia with 0.75{\%} ropivacaine, patients were randomized to two postoperative epidural infusion groups to receive plain 1{\%} lidocaine (plain group) or 2{\%} lidocaine diluted with the same volume of normal saline (dilution group). Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 mL/h. Measurements and Main Results: Regression of sensory block was significantly prolonged in the plain group, resulting in a significant difference in the spread of sensory block between the two agents from 4 to 6 h postoperatively. There also was a significant difference from the two groups in the level of motor block (modified Bromage scale) between 3 and 5 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Two percent lidocaine diluted with the same volume of saline is a less potent than the plain 1{\%} lidocaine. The effect of saline as a diluent on epidurally administrated local anesthetics may be of clinical importance.",
author = "Akifumi Kanai and Shintaro Koiso and Sumio Hoka",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.011",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "534--538",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of analgesia induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline

AU - Kanai, Akifumi

AU - Koiso, Shintaro

AU - Hoka, Sumio

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Study Objective: To compare the extent of sensory block induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to 1% lidocaine. Design: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 40 ASA physical status I inpatients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery. Interventions: After surgery with lumbar epidural anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine, patients were randomized to two postoperative epidural infusion groups to receive plain 1% lidocaine (plain group) or 2% lidocaine diluted with the same volume of normal saline (dilution group). Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 mL/h. Measurements and Main Results: Regression of sensory block was significantly prolonged in the plain group, resulting in a significant difference in the spread of sensory block between the two agents from 4 to 6 h postoperatively. There also was a significant difference from the two groups in the level of motor block (modified Bromage scale) between 3 and 5 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Two percent lidocaine diluted with the same volume of saline is a less potent than the plain 1% lidocaine. The effect of saline as a diluent on epidurally administrated local anesthetics may be of clinical importance.

AB - Study Objective: To compare the extent of sensory block induced by continuous epidural infusion of plain 1% lidocaine and 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to 1% lidocaine. Design: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 40 ASA physical status I inpatients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery. Interventions: After surgery with lumbar epidural anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine, patients were randomized to two postoperative epidural infusion groups to receive plain 1% lidocaine (plain group) or 2% lidocaine diluted with the same volume of normal saline (dilution group). Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 mL/h. Measurements and Main Results: Regression of sensory block was significantly prolonged in the plain group, resulting in a significant difference in the spread of sensory block between the two agents from 4 to 6 h postoperatively. There also was a significant difference from the two groups in the level of motor block (modified Bromage scale) between 3 and 5 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Two percent lidocaine diluted with the same volume of saline is a less potent than the plain 1% lidocaine. The effect of saline as a diluent on epidurally administrated local anesthetics may be of clinical importance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549074215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549074215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 18063209

AN - SCOPUS:36549074215

VL - 19

SP - 534

EP - 538

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 7

ER -