Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas

K. Ida, T. Fujita, T. Fukuda, Y. Sakamoto, S. Ide, K. Toi, S. Inagakl, T. Shimozuma, S. Kubo, Hiroshi Idei, akihide fujisawa, S. Ohdachi, M. Yoshinuma, H. Funaba, K. Narihara, S. Murakami, A. Wakasa, M. Yokoyama, Y. Takeiri, K. Y. WatanabeK. Tanaka, Y. Liang, N. Ohyabu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Plasmas with an electron internal transport barrier (ITB), which is characterized by peaked electron temperature profiles, are obtained in the JT-60U tokamak and in the large helical device (LHD) when the electron cyclotron heating (ECH) is focused on the magnetic axis. The maximum values of R/L Te, where R is the major radius and LTe is the scale length of the electron temperature gradient, are similar for the LHD and JT-60U ITB plasmas. However, there is a clear jump of R/LTe observed in LHD but not in JT-60U in the ECH power scan. This result is consistent with the fact that the trigger mechanism of the electron ITB is the fast transition of the radial electric field from a small negative Er to a large positive Er in LHD and a change of the magnetic shear from positive to negative is required for the formation of the electron ITB in JT-60U. There are also differences in the electron temperature profiles inside the ITB. The flattening of the electron temperature profile inside the strong ITB could be explained by the sharp increase of q values observed in JT-60U, while no flattening of the electron temperature profile is observed in LHD, where the central q values stay low.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
    Volume46
    Issue number5 SUPPL. A
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2004

    Fingerprint

    Electron temperature
    Plasmas
    temperature profiles
    electron energy
    Electrons
    electron cyclotron heating
    Cyclotrons
    electrons
    flattening
    Heating
    Electron transitions
    Thermal gradients
    guy wires
    Electric fields
    temperature gradients
    actuators
    shear
    radii
    electric fields

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
    • Condensed Matter Physics

    Cite this

    Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas. / Ida, K.; Fujita, T.; Fukuda, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Ide, S.; Toi, K.; Inagakl, S.; Shimozuma, T.; Kubo, S.; Idei, Hiroshi; fujisawa, akihide; Ohdachi, S.; Yoshinuma, M.; Funaba, H.; Narihara, K.; Murakami, S.; Wakasa, A.; Yokoyama, M.; Takeiri, Y.; Watanabe, K. Y.; Tanaka, K.; Liang, Y.; Ohyabu, N.

    In: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 46, No. 5 SUPPL. A, 01.01.2004.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ida, K, Fujita, T, Fukuda, T, Sakamoto, Y, Ide, S, Toi, K, Inagakl, S, Shimozuma, T, Kubo, S, Idei, H, fujisawa, A, Ohdachi, S, Yoshinuma, M, Funaba, H, Narihara, K, Murakami, S, Wakasa, A, Yokoyama, M, Takeiri, Y, Watanabe, KY, Tanaka, K, Liang, Y & Ohyabu, N 2004, 'Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas', Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 46, no. 5 SUPPL. A. https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/46/5A/004
    Ida, K. ; Fujita, T. ; Fukuda, T. ; Sakamoto, Y. ; Ide, S. ; Toi, K. ; Inagakl, S. ; Shimozuma, T. ; Kubo, S. ; Idei, Hiroshi ; fujisawa, akihide ; Ohdachi, S. ; Yoshinuma, M. ; Funaba, H. ; Narihara, K. ; Murakami, S. ; Wakasa, A. ; Yokoyama, M. ; Takeiri, Y. ; Watanabe, K. Y. ; Tanaka, K. ; Liang, Y. ; Ohyabu, N. / Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas. In: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 2004 ; Vol. 46, No. 5 SUPPL. A.
    @article{f6132250493d452885eb31b347af75a0,
    title = "Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas",
    abstract = "Plasmas with an electron internal transport barrier (ITB), which is characterized by peaked electron temperature profiles, are obtained in the JT-60U tokamak and in the large helical device (LHD) when the electron cyclotron heating (ECH) is focused on the magnetic axis. The maximum values of R/L Te, where R is the major radius and LTe is the scale length of the electron temperature gradient, are similar for the LHD and JT-60U ITB plasmas. However, there is a clear jump of R/LTe observed in LHD but not in JT-60U in the ECH power scan. This result is consistent with the fact that the trigger mechanism of the electron ITB is the fast transition of the radial electric field from a small negative Er to a large positive Er in LHD and a change of the magnetic shear from positive to negative is required for the formation of the electron ITB in JT-60U. There are also differences in the electron temperature profiles inside the ITB. The flattening of the electron temperature profile inside the strong ITB could be explained by the sharp increase of q values observed in JT-60U, while no flattening of the electron temperature profile is observed in LHD, where the central q values stay low.",
    author = "K. Ida and T. Fujita and T. Fukuda and Y. Sakamoto and S. Ide and K. Toi and S. Inagakl and T. Shimozuma and S. Kubo and Hiroshi Idei and akihide fujisawa and S. Ohdachi and M. Yoshinuma and H. Funaba and K. Narihara and S. Murakami and A. Wakasa and M. Yokoyama and Y. Takeiri and Watanabe, {K. Y.} and K. Tanaka and Y. Liang and N. Ohyabu",
    year = "2004",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1088/0741-3335/46/5A/004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "46",
    journal = "Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion",
    issn = "0741-3335",
    publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "5 SUPPL. A",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparison of electron internal transport barriers in the large helical device and JT-60U plasmas

    AU - Ida, K.

    AU - Fujita, T.

    AU - Fukuda, T.

    AU - Sakamoto, Y.

    AU - Ide, S.

    AU - Toi, K.

    AU - Inagakl, S.

    AU - Shimozuma, T.

    AU - Kubo, S.

    AU - Idei, Hiroshi

    AU - fujisawa, akihide

    AU - Ohdachi, S.

    AU - Yoshinuma, M.

    AU - Funaba, H.

    AU - Narihara, K.

    AU - Murakami, S.

    AU - Wakasa, A.

    AU - Yokoyama, M.

    AU - Takeiri, Y.

    AU - Watanabe, K. Y.

    AU - Tanaka, K.

    AU - Liang, Y.

    AU - Ohyabu, N.

    PY - 2004/1/1

    Y1 - 2004/1/1

    N2 - Plasmas with an electron internal transport barrier (ITB), which is characterized by peaked electron temperature profiles, are obtained in the JT-60U tokamak and in the large helical device (LHD) when the electron cyclotron heating (ECH) is focused on the magnetic axis. The maximum values of R/L Te, where R is the major radius and LTe is the scale length of the electron temperature gradient, are similar for the LHD and JT-60U ITB plasmas. However, there is a clear jump of R/LTe observed in LHD but not in JT-60U in the ECH power scan. This result is consistent with the fact that the trigger mechanism of the electron ITB is the fast transition of the radial electric field from a small negative Er to a large positive Er in LHD and a change of the magnetic shear from positive to negative is required for the formation of the electron ITB in JT-60U. There are also differences in the electron temperature profiles inside the ITB. The flattening of the electron temperature profile inside the strong ITB could be explained by the sharp increase of q values observed in JT-60U, while no flattening of the electron temperature profile is observed in LHD, where the central q values stay low.

    AB - Plasmas with an electron internal transport barrier (ITB), which is characterized by peaked electron temperature profiles, are obtained in the JT-60U tokamak and in the large helical device (LHD) when the electron cyclotron heating (ECH) is focused on the magnetic axis. The maximum values of R/L Te, where R is the major radius and LTe is the scale length of the electron temperature gradient, are similar for the LHD and JT-60U ITB plasmas. However, there is a clear jump of R/LTe observed in LHD but not in JT-60U in the ECH power scan. This result is consistent with the fact that the trigger mechanism of the electron ITB is the fast transition of the radial electric field from a small negative Er to a large positive Er in LHD and a change of the magnetic shear from positive to negative is required for the formation of the electron ITB in JT-60U. There are also differences in the electron temperature profiles inside the ITB. The flattening of the electron temperature profile inside the strong ITB could be explained by the sharp increase of q values observed in JT-60U, while no flattening of the electron temperature profile is observed in LHD, where the central q values stay low.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942589199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942589199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1088/0741-3335/46/5A/004

    DO - 10.1088/0741-3335/46/5A/004

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:2942589199

    VL - 46

    JO - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

    JF - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

    SN - 0741-3335

    IS - 5 SUPPL. A

    ER -