Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility

Su Young Son, Ilham Bakri, Satoshi Muraki, Yutaka Tochihara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1019-1027
    Number of pages9
    JournalApplied Ergonomics
    Volume45
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Human Factors and Ergonomics
    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
    • Engineering (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this