Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility

Su Young Son, Ilham Bakri, Satoshi Muraki, Yutaka Tochihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1019-1027
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Firefighters
Clothing
Shoes
Personal Protective Equipment
Heart Rate
performance
Testing
Group
present
clothing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility. / Son, Su Young; Bakri, Ilham; Muraki, Satoshi; Tochihara, Yutaka.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 1019-1027.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2924a3e659df44ce8a5405cde938b6dc,
title = "Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility",
abstract = "The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.",
author = "Son, {Su Young} and Ilham Bakri and Satoshi Muraki and Yutaka Tochihara",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1019--1027",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility

AU - Son, Su Young

AU - Bakri, Ilham

AU - Muraki, Satoshi

AU - Tochihara, Yutaka

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.

AB - The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899076355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899076355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 24462474

AN - SCOPUS:84899076355

VL - 45

SP - 1019

EP - 1027

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 4

ER -