TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of PLGA reinforcement method for carbonate apatite foam
AU - Munar, Girlie M.
AU - Munar, Melvin L.
AU - Tsuru, Kanji
AU - Ishikawa, Kunio
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) foam with interconnecting porous structure is a potential candidate as bone substitute material owing to its similarity to the cancellous bone with respect to composition, morphology and osteoclastic degradation. However, it is brittle and difficult to handle. This is thought to be caused by no organic material in the CO3Ap foam. The aim of this study is to reinforce the CO3Ap foam with poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). Immersion and vacuum infiltration methods were compared as reinforcing methods. Compressive strength of unreinforced CO3Ap foam, (12.0 ± 4.9 kPa) increased after PLGA reinforcement by immersion (187.6 ± 57.6 kPa) or by vacuum infiltration (407 ± 111.4 kPa). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the preservation of full interconnecting porous structure of CO3Ap foam after PLGA reinforcement using immersion or vacuum infiltration. Interface between the PLGA and CO3Ap foam, however revealed that no gap was found between the PLGA and CO3Ap foam interface when vacuum was used to reinforce the PLGA whereas a gap was found when simple immersion was used. Strong interface between PLGA and CO3Ap foam is therefore thought to be the key for higher compressive strength. In conclusion, vacuum infiltration is a more efficient method to reinforce the CO3Ap foam with PLGA for improving the mechanical strength without sacrificing the cancellous bone-type morphology.
AB - Carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) foam with interconnecting porous structure is a potential candidate as bone substitute material owing to its similarity to the cancellous bone with respect to composition, morphology and osteoclastic degradation. However, it is brittle and difficult to handle. This is thought to be caused by no organic material in the CO3Ap foam. The aim of this study is to reinforce the CO3Ap foam with poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). Immersion and vacuum infiltration methods were compared as reinforcing methods. Compressive strength of unreinforced CO3Ap foam, (12.0 ± 4.9 kPa) increased after PLGA reinforcement by immersion (187.6 ± 57.6 kPa) or by vacuum infiltration (407 ± 111.4 kPa). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the preservation of full interconnecting porous structure of CO3Ap foam after PLGA reinforcement using immersion or vacuum infiltration. Interface between the PLGA and CO3Ap foam, however revealed that no gap was found between the PLGA and CO3Ap foam interface when vacuum was used to reinforce the PLGA whereas a gap was found when simple immersion was used. Strong interface between PLGA and CO3Ap foam is therefore thought to be the key for higher compressive strength. In conclusion, vacuum infiltration is a more efficient method to reinforce the CO3Ap foam with PLGA for improving the mechanical strength without sacrificing the cancellous bone-type morphology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871273270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871273270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.529-530.417
DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.529-530.417
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84871273270
SN - 9783037855171
T3 - Key Engineering Materials
SP - 417
EP - 420
BT - Bioceramics 24
PB - Trans Tech Publications Ltd
T2 - 24th Symposium and Annual Meeting of International Society for Ceramics in Medicine, ISCM 2012
Y2 - 21 October 2012 through 24 October 2012
ER -