Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis: Hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy

Kazuhiro Otani, Shuji Shimizu, Kazuo Chijiiwa, Takahiro Ogawa, Takashi Morisaki, Atsushi Sugitani, Koji Yamaguchi, Masao Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Hepatic resection and percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) are the two main approaches to the treatment of hepatolithiasis, but comparisons of longterm followup results have not been adequately reported. Study Design: Of 86 patients with hepatolithiasis admitted to our institution between 1980 and 1996, we reviewed 54 patients: 26 who underwent hepatic resection and 28 who underwent PTCSL. Five patients who underwent postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy were included in the former group. The remainder of the hepatolithiasis patients were not treated by hepatic resection or PTCSL and, therefore, were excluded from this study. Hepatic resections were mainly indicated for left- sided localized intrahepatic calculi, atrophic liver, and possible presence of cholangiocellular carcinoma. PTCSL was performed for right-sided, bilateral or recurrent stones at an average of 6 treatments (range 1 to 20 treatments) for each patient. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender or age. The recurrence rate of stones and longterm prognosis were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and other clinical factors listed below were statistically compared. Results: The rate of complete removal of stones was similarly high in each group (96.2% in the hepatic resection group versus 96.4% in the PTCSL group). The complication (38.5% versus 21.4%) and 5-year survival (85.6% versus 100%) rates were comparable. Remaining bile duct stricture (18.2% versus 60.9%, p < 0.01) and 5-year recurrence rates (5.6% versus 31.5%, p < 0.05) were statistically lower in the hepatic resection group than in the PTCSL group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection, when combined with postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy, is a preferable treatment for left-sided stones with strictures and bilateral stones.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-182
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume189
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 1999

Fingerprint

Liver
Therapeutics
Pathologic Constriction
Recurrence
Cholangiocarcinoma
Calculi
Bile Ducts
Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis : Hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy. / Otani, Kazuhiro; Shimizu, Shuji; Chijiiwa, Kazuo; Ogawa, Takahiro; Morisaki, Takashi; Sugitani, Atsushi; Yamaguchi, Koji; Tanaka, Masao.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 189, No. 2, 01.08.1999, p. 177-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Otani, Kazuhiro ; Shimizu, Shuji ; Chijiiwa, Kazuo ; Ogawa, Takahiro ; Morisaki, Takashi ; Sugitani, Atsushi ; Yamaguchi, Koji ; Tanaka, Masao. / Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis : Hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 1999 ; Vol. 189, No. 2. pp. 177-182.
@article{6322bfc0e7ff41fb9060d0d202c140af,
title = "Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis: Hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy",
abstract = "Background: Hepatic resection and percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) are the two main approaches to the treatment of hepatolithiasis, but comparisons of longterm followup results have not been adequately reported. Study Design: Of 86 patients with hepatolithiasis admitted to our institution between 1980 and 1996, we reviewed 54 patients: 26 who underwent hepatic resection and 28 who underwent PTCSL. Five patients who underwent postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy were included in the former group. The remainder of the hepatolithiasis patients were not treated by hepatic resection or PTCSL and, therefore, were excluded from this study. Hepatic resections were mainly indicated for left- sided localized intrahepatic calculi, atrophic liver, and possible presence of cholangiocellular carcinoma. PTCSL was performed for right-sided, bilateral or recurrent stones at an average of 6 treatments (range 1 to 20 treatments) for each patient. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender or age. The recurrence rate of stones and longterm prognosis were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and other clinical factors listed below were statistically compared. Results: The rate of complete removal of stones was similarly high in each group (96.2{\%} in the hepatic resection group versus 96.4{\%} in the PTCSL group). The complication (38.5{\%} versus 21.4{\%}) and 5-year survival (85.6{\%} versus 100{\%}) rates were comparable. Remaining bile duct stricture (18.2{\%} versus 60.9{\%}, p < 0.01) and 5-year recurrence rates (5.6{\%} versus 31.5{\%}, p < 0.05) were statistically lower in the hepatic resection group than in the PTCSL group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection, when combined with postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy, is a preferable treatment for left-sided stones with strictures and bilateral stones.",
author = "Kazuhiro Otani and Shuji Shimizu and Kazuo Chijiiwa and Takahiro Ogawa and Takashi Morisaki and Atsushi Sugitani and Koji Yamaguchi and Masao Tanaka",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00109-X",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "177--182",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis

T2 - Hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy

AU - Otani, Kazuhiro

AU - Shimizu, Shuji

AU - Chijiiwa, Kazuo

AU - Ogawa, Takahiro

AU - Morisaki, Takashi

AU - Sugitani, Atsushi

AU - Yamaguchi, Koji

AU - Tanaka, Masao

PY - 1999/8/1

Y1 - 1999/8/1

N2 - Background: Hepatic resection and percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) are the two main approaches to the treatment of hepatolithiasis, but comparisons of longterm followup results have not been adequately reported. Study Design: Of 86 patients with hepatolithiasis admitted to our institution between 1980 and 1996, we reviewed 54 patients: 26 who underwent hepatic resection and 28 who underwent PTCSL. Five patients who underwent postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy were included in the former group. The remainder of the hepatolithiasis patients were not treated by hepatic resection or PTCSL and, therefore, were excluded from this study. Hepatic resections were mainly indicated for left- sided localized intrahepatic calculi, atrophic liver, and possible presence of cholangiocellular carcinoma. PTCSL was performed for right-sided, bilateral or recurrent stones at an average of 6 treatments (range 1 to 20 treatments) for each patient. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender or age. The recurrence rate of stones and longterm prognosis were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and other clinical factors listed below were statistically compared. Results: The rate of complete removal of stones was similarly high in each group (96.2% in the hepatic resection group versus 96.4% in the PTCSL group). The complication (38.5% versus 21.4%) and 5-year survival (85.6% versus 100%) rates were comparable. Remaining bile duct stricture (18.2% versus 60.9%, p < 0.01) and 5-year recurrence rates (5.6% versus 31.5%, p < 0.05) were statistically lower in the hepatic resection group than in the PTCSL group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection, when combined with postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy, is a preferable treatment for left-sided stones with strictures and bilateral stones.

AB - Background: Hepatic resection and percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) are the two main approaches to the treatment of hepatolithiasis, but comparisons of longterm followup results have not been adequately reported. Study Design: Of 86 patients with hepatolithiasis admitted to our institution between 1980 and 1996, we reviewed 54 patients: 26 who underwent hepatic resection and 28 who underwent PTCSL. Five patients who underwent postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy were included in the former group. The remainder of the hepatolithiasis patients were not treated by hepatic resection or PTCSL and, therefore, were excluded from this study. Hepatic resections were mainly indicated for left- sided localized intrahepatic calculi, atrophic liver, and possible presence of cholangiocellular carcinoma. PTCSL was performed for right-sided, bilateral or recurrent stones at an average of 6 treatments (range 1 to 20 treatments) for each patient. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender or age. The recurrence rate of stones and longterm prognosis were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and other clinical factors listed below were statistically compared. Results: The rate of complete removal of stones was similarly high in each group (96.2% in the hepatic resection group versus 96.4% in the PTCSL group). The complication (38.5% versus 21.4%) and 5-year survival (85.6% versus 100%) rates were comparable. Remaining bile duct stricture (18.2% versus 60.9%, p < 0.01) and 5-year recurrence rates (5.6% versus 31.5%, p < 0.05) were statistically lower in the hepatic resection group than in the PTCSL group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection, when combined with postoperative cholangioscopic lithotomy, is a preferable treatment for left-sided stones with strictures and bilateral stones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032838573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032838573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00109-X

DO - 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00109-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 10437840

AN - SCOPUS:0032838573

VL - 189

SP - 177

EP - 182

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 2

ER -