Comparison of viewing angle and observer performances in different types of liquid-crystal display monitors

Shiro Hatanaka, Junji Morishita, Takeshi Hiwasa, Kiyoshi Dogomori, Fukai Toyofuku, Masafumi Ohki, Yoshiharu Higashida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is known that the performance of liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors, such as the luminance and contrast ratio, is dependent on the viewing angle. Our purpose in this study was to compare the angular performance and the effect on observer performance of different types of LCD monitors. The luminance performance and contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle (-60° to 60°) in each direction for two types of LCD monitors, namely, a general-purpose LCD monitor and one especially designed for medical use, were measured in this study. Furthermore, the observer performance at various viewing angles in the horizontal direction for a medical-grade LCD monitor was investigated by eight observers based on a contrast-detail diagram. The two types of LCD monitors showed notable variations in luminance and contrast ratio as a function of the viewing angle. Acceptable viewing angles in terms of the contrast ratio were much smaller in each direction than those for nominal viewing angles in the specifications provided by the manufacturers, and those for the medical-grade LCD monitor in the horizontal and vertical directions were broader than those of the general-purpose LCD monitor. There was no significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 40°. On the other hand, our results showed a statistically significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 60°.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-174
Number of pages9
JournalRadiological physics and technology
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2009

Fingerprint

Liquid Crystals
monitors
liquid crystals
luminance
grade
specifications
diagrams
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comparison of viewing angle and observer performances in different types of liquid-crystal display monitors. / Hatanaka, Shiro; Morishita, Junji; Hiwasa, Takeshi; Dogomori, Kiyoshi; Toyofuku, Fukai; Ohki, Masafumi; Higashida, Yoshiharu.

In: Radiological physics and technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.07.2009, p. 166-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatanaka, Shiro ; Morishita, Junji ; Hiwasa, Takeshi ; Dogomori, Kiyoshi ; Toyofuku, Fukai ; Ohki, Masafumi ; Higashida, Yoshiharu. / Comparison of viewing angle and observer performances in different types of liquid-crystal display monitors. In: Radiological physics and technology. 2009 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 166-174.
@article{2f27004b7f7b4f56a1e1c9fe0e3dce21,
title = "Comparison of viewing angle and observer performances in different types of liquid-crystal display monitors",
abstract = "It is known that the performance of liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors, such as the luminance and contrast ratio, is dependent on the viewing angle. Our purpose in this study was to compare the angular performance and the effect on observer performance of different types of LCD monitors. The luminance performance and contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle (-60° to 60°) in each direction for two types of LCD monitors, namely, a general-purpose LCD monitor and one especially designed for medical use, were measured in this study. Furthermore, the observer performance at various viewing angles in the horizontal direction for a medical-grade LCD monitor was investigated by eight observers based on a contrast-detail diagram. The two types of LCD monitors showed notable variations in luminance and contrast ratio as a function of the viewing angle. Acceptable viewing angles in terms of the contrast ratio were much smaller in each direction than those for nominal viewing angles in the specifications provided by the manufacturers, and those for the medical-grade LCD monitor in the horizontal and vertical directions were broader than those of the general-purpose LCD monitor. There was no significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 40°. On the other hand, our results showed a statistically significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 60°.",
author = "Shiro Hatanaka and Junji Morishita and Takeshi Hiwasa and Kiyoshi Dogomori and Fukai Toyofuku and Masafumi Ohki and Yoshiharu Higashida",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12194-009-0061-6",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "166--174",
journal = "Radiological Physics and Technology",
issn = "1865-0333",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of viewing angle and observer performances in different types of liquid-crystal display monitors

AU - Hatanaka, Shiro

AU - Morishita, Junji

AU - Hiwasa, Takeshi

AU - Dogomori, Kiyoshi

AU - Toyofuku, Fukai

AU - Ohki, Masafumi

AU - Higashida, Yoshiharu

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - It is known that the performance of liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors, such as the luminance and contrast ratio, is dependent on the viewing angle. Our purpose in this study was to compare the angular performance and the effect on observer performance of different types of LCD monitors. The luminance performance and contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle (-60° to 60°) in each direction for two types of LCD monitors, namely, a general-purpose LCD monitor and one especially designed for medical use, were measured in this study. Furthermore, the observer performance at various viewing angles in the horizontal direction for a medical-grade LCD monitor was investigated by eight observers based on a contrast-detail diagram. The two types of LCD monitors showed notable variations in luminance and contrast ratio as a function of the viewing angle. Acceptable viewing angles in terms of the contrast ratio were much smaller in each direction than those for nominal viewing angles in the specifications provided by the manufacturers, and those for the medical-grade LCD monitor in the horizontal and vertical directions were broader than those of the general-purpose LCD monitor. There was no significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 40°. On the other hand, our results showed a statistically significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 60°.

AB - It is known that the performance of liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors, such as the luminance and contrast ratio, is dependent on the viewing angle. Our purpose in this study was to compare the angular performance and the effect on observer performance of different types of LCD monitors. The luminance performance and contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle (-60° to 60°) in each direction for two types of LCD monitors, namely, a general-purpose LCD monitor and one especially designed for medical use, were measured in this study. Furthermore, the observer performance at various viewing angles in the horizontal direction for a medical-grade LCD monitor was investigated by eight observers based on a contrast-detail diagram. The two types of LCD monitors showed notable variations in luminance and contrast ratio as a function of the viewing angle. Acceptable viewing angles in terms of the contrast ratio were much smaller in each direction than those for nominal viewing angles in the specifications provided by the manufacturers, and those for the medical-grade LCD monitor in the horizontal and vertical directions were broader than those of the general-purpose LCD monitor. There was no significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 40°. On the other hand, our results showed a statistically significant difference in observer performance between 0°and 60°.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68449090620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68449090620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12194-009-0061-6

DO - 10.1007/s12194-009-0061-6

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 166

EP - 174

JO - Radiological Physics and Technology

JF - Radiological Physics and Technology

SN - 1865-0333

IS - 2

ER -