Computer-aided beam arrangement based on similar cases in radiation treatment-planning databases for stereotactic lung radiation therapy

Taiki Magome, Hidetaka Arimura, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Asumi Mizoguchi, Chiaki Tokunaga, Katsumasa Nakamura, Hiroshi Honda, Masafumi Ohki, Fukai Toyofuku, Hideki Hirata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided method for determination of beam arrangements based on similar cases in a radiotherapy treatment-planning database for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. Similar-case-based beam arrangements were automatically determined based on the following two steps. First, the five most similar cases were searched, based on geometrical features related to the location, size and shape of the planning target volume, lung and spinal cord. Second, five beam arrangements of an objective case were automatically determined by registering five similar cases with the objective case, with respect to lung regions, by means of a linear registration technique. For evaluation of the beam arrangements five treatment plans were manually created by applying the beam arrangements determined in the second step to the objective case. The most usable beam arrangement was selected by sorting the five treatment plans based on eight plan evaluation indices, including the D95, mean lung dose and spinal cord maximum dose. We applied the proposed method to 10 test cases, by using an RTP database of 81 cases with lung cancer, and compared the eight plan evaluation indices between the original treatment plan and the corresponding most usable similar-case-based treatment plan. As a result, the proposed method may provide usable beam arrangements, which have no statistically significant differences from the original beam arrangements (P > 0.05) in terms of the eight plan evaluation indices. Therefore, the proposed method could be employed as an educational tool for less experienced treatment planners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-577
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of radiation research
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

lungs
planning
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Databases
Radiation
Lung
radiation
spinal cord
evaluation
Spinal Cord
Therapeutics
dosage
Lung Neoplasms
classifying
cancer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Computer-aided beam arrangement based on similar cases in radiation treatment-planning databases for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. / Magome, Taiki; Arimura, Hidetaka; Shioyama, Yoshiyuki; Mizoguchi, Asumi; Tokunaga, Chiaki; Nakamura, Katsumasa; Honda, Hiroshi; Ohki, Masafumi; Toyofuku, Fukai; Hirata, Hideki.

In: Journal of radiation research, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.05.2013, p. 569-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magome, Taiki ; Arimura, Hidetaka ; Shioyama, Yoshiyuki ; Mizoguchi, Asumi ; Tokunaga, Chiaki ; Nakamura, Katsumasa ; Honda, Hiroshi ; Ohki, Masafumi ; Toyofuku, Fukai ; Hirata, Hideki. / Computer-aided beam arrangement based on similar cases in radiation treatment-planning databases for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. In: Journal of radiation research. 2013 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 569-577.
@article{02bd9f3172234f8a8d33a2bd982d0577,
title = "Computer-aided beam arrangement based on similar cases in radiation treatment-planning databases for stereotactic lung radiation therapy",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided method for determination of beam arrangements based on similar cases in a radiotherapy treatment-planning database for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. Similar-case-based beam arrangements were automatically determined based on the following two steps. First, the five most similar cases were searched, based on geometrical features related to the location, size and shape of the planning target volume, lung and spinal cord. Second, five beam arrangements of an objective case were automatically determined by registering five similar cases with the objective case, with respect to lung regions, by means of a linear registration technique. For evaluation of the beam arrangements five treatment plans were manually created by applying the beam arrangements determined in the second step to the objective case. The most usable beam arrangement was selected by sorting the five treatment plans based on eight plan evaluation indices, including the D95, mean lung dose and spinal cord maximum dose. We applied the proposed method to 10 test cases, by using an RTP database of 81 cases with lung cancer, and compared the eight plan evaluation indices between the original treatment plan and the corresponding most usable similar-case-based treatment plan. As a result, the proposed method may provide usable beam arrangements, which have no statistically significant differences from the original beam arrangements (P > 0.05) in terms of the eight plan evaluation indices. Therefore, the proposed method could be employed as an educational tool for less experienced treatment planners.",
author = "Taiki Magome and Hidetaka Arimura and Yoshiyuki Shioyama and Asumi Mizoguchi and Chiaki Tokunaga and Katsumasa Nakamura and Hiroshi Honda and Masafumi Ohki and Fukai Toyofuku and Hideki Hirata",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jrr/rrs123",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "569--577",
journal = "Journal of Radiation Research",
issn = "0449-3060",
publisher = "Japan Radiation Research Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer-aided beam arrangement based on similar cases in radiation treatment-planning databases for stereotactic lung radiation therapy

AU - Magome, Taiki

AU - Arimura, Hidetaka

AU - Shioyama, Yoshiyuki

AU - Mizoguchi, Asumi

AU - Tokunaga, Chiaki

AU - Nakamura, Katsumasa

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

AU - Ohki, Masafumi

AU - Toyofuku, Fukai

AU - Hirata, Hideki

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided method for determination of beam arrangements based on similar cases in a radiotherapy treatment-planning database for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. Similar-case-based beam arrangements were automatically determined based on the following two steps. First, the five most similar cases were searched, based on geometrical features related to the location, size and shape of the planning target volume, lung and spinal cord. Second, five beam arrangements of an objective case were automatically determined by registering five similar cases with the objective case, with respect to lung regions, by means of a linear registration technique. For evaluation of the beam arrangements five treatment plans were manually created by applying the beam arrangements determined in the second step to the objective case. The most usable beam arrangement was selected by sorting the five treatment plans based on eight plan evaluation indices, including the D95, mean lung dose and spinal cord maximum dose. We applied the proposed method to 10 test cases, by using an RTP database of 81 cases with lung cancer, and compared the eight plan evaluation indices between the original treatment plan and the corresponding most usable similar-case-based treatment plan. As a result, the proposed method may provide usable beam arrangements, which have no statistically significant differences from the original beam arrangements (P > 0.05) in terms of the eight plan evaluation indices. Therefore, the proposed method could be employed as an educational tool for less experienced treatment planners.

AB - The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided method for determination of beam arrangements based on similar cases in a radiotherapy treatment-planning database for stereotactic lung radiation therapy. Similar-case-based beam arrangements were automatically determined based on the following two steps. First, the five most similar cases were searched, based on geometrical features related to the location, size and shape of the planning target volume, lung and spinal cord. Second, five beam arrangements of an objective case were automatically determined by registering five similar cases with the objective case, with respect to lung regions, by means of a linear registration technique. For evaluation of the beam arrangements five treatment plans were manually created by applying the beam arrangements determined in the second step to the objective case. The most usable beam arrangement was selected by sorting the five treatment plans based on eight plan evaluation indices, including the D95, mean lung dose and spinal cord maximum dose. We applied the proposed method to 10 test cases, by using an RTP database of 81 cases with lung cancer, and compared the eight plan evaluation indices between the original treatment plan and the corresponding most usable similar-case-based treatment plan. As a result, the proposed method may provide usable beam arrangements, which have no statistically significant differences from the original beam arrangements (P > 0.05) in terms of the eight plan evaluation indices. Therefore, the proposed method could be employed as an educational tool for less experienced treatment planners.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877727144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877727144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jrr/rrs123

DO - 10.1093/jrr/rrs123

M3 - Article

C2 - 23249674

AN - SCOPUS:84877727144

VL - 54

SP - 569

EP - 577

JO - Journal of Radiation Research

JF - Journal of Radiation Research

SN - 0449-3060

IS - 3

ER -