Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan

Ko Jun Suzuki, Shigeyuki Nakaji, Shoji Tokunaga, Tadashi Shimoyama, Takashi Umeda, Kazuo Sugawara

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluation of cancer screening using case-control studies is less valid in comparison to randomized controlled trails, due to the intrusion of a possible self-selection bias in the former. The randomized controlled trial approach, however, may be difficult in developed countries where mass cancer screening programs are already being performed nationally. Accordingly, case-control studies are often performed instead of randomized controlled trials. In case-control studies, no reports could be found in the literature using dietary habit, an important influencing factor in carcinogenesis, as an adjusting item. We surveyed nutrition and food intake status through a nutrition survey using the weighing method, and smoking prevalence and alcohol consumption with questionnaires in the general population in northern Japan, in subjects over 30 years of age. We then compared these results among non-participants and participants in cancer screening programs, and evaluated how any differences between the two groups might affect the results of case-control studies. Non-participants had a significantly lower intake of vegetables, carotene, vitamin C, and dietary fiber, which are thought to be beneficial factors in the prevention of carcinogenesis. Non-participants had a significantly higher cigarette smoking prevalence than participants. In relation to the intake of vegetables, a difference between participants and non-participants was evident, as proper adjustment for vegetable intake led to an odds ratio closer to the null value. The value of the odds ratio will probably not decrease, but it might increase when other dietary factors or smoking are taken into consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-78
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Case-Control Studies
Japan
Vegetables
Smoking
Carcinogenesis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio
Unmyelinated Nerve Fibers
Mass Screening
Selection Bias
Nutrition Surveys
Dietary Fiber
Feeding Behavior
Carotenoids
Developed Countries
Alcohol Drinking
Ascorbic Acid
Eating
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan. / Suzuki, Ko Jun; Nakaji, Shigeyuki; Tokunaga, Shoji; Shimoyama, Tadashi; Umeda, Takashi; Sugawara, Kazuo.

In: European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 73-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Suzuki, Ko Jun ; Nakaji, Shigeyuki ; Tokunaga, Shoji ; Shimoyama, Tadashi ; Umeda, Takashi ; Sugawara, Kazuo. / Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan. In: European Journal of Epidemiology. 2005 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 73-78.
@article{f1f79332d9f54b1b80dccc387a535e51,
title = "Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan",
abstract = "Evaluation of cancer screening using case-control studies is less valid in comparison to randomized controlled trails, due to the intrusion of a possible self-selection bias in the former. The randomized controlled trial approach, however, may be difficult in developed countries where mass cancer screening programs are already being performed nationally. Accordingly, case-control studies are often performed instead of randomized controlled trials. In case-control studies, no reports could be found in the literature using dietary habit, an important influencing factor in carcinogenesis, as an adjusting item. We surveyed nutrition and food intake status through a nutrition survey using the weighing method, and smoking prevalence and alcohol consumption with questionnaires in the general population in northern Japan, in subjects over 30 years of age. We then compared these results among non-participants and participants in cancer screening programs, and evaluated how any differences between the two groups might affect the results of case-control studies. Non-participants had a significantly lower intake of vegetables, carotene, vitamin C, and dietary fiber, which are thought to be beneficial factors in the prevention of carcinogenesis. Non-participants had a significantly higher cigarette smoking prevalence than participants. In relation to the intake of vegetables, a difference between participants and non-participants was evident, as proper adjustment for vegetable intake led to an odds ratio closer to the null value. The value of the odds ratio will probably not decrease, but it might increase when other dietary factors or smoking are taken into consideration.",
author = "Suzuki, {Ko Jun} and Shigeyuki Nakaji and Shoji Tokunaga and Tadashi Shimoyama and Takashi Umeda and Kazuo Sugawara",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10654-004-0872-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "73--78",
journal = "European Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0393-2990",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan

AU - Suzuki, Ko Jun

AU - Nakaji, Shigeyuki

AU - Tokunaga, Shoji

AU - Shimoyama, Tadashi

AU - Umeda, Takashi

AU - Sugawara, Kazuo

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Evaluation of cancer screening using case-control studies is less valid in comparison to randomized controlled trails, due to the intrusion of a possible self-selection bias in the former. The randomized controlled trial approach, however, may be difficult in developed countries where mass cancer screening programs are already being performed nationally. Accordingly, case-control studies are often performed instead of randomized controlled trials. In case-control studies, no reports could be found in the literature using dietary habit, an important influencing factor in carcinogenesis, as an adjusting item. We surveyed nutrition and food intake status through a nutrition survey using the weighing method, and smoking prevalence and alcohol consumption with questionnaires in the general population in northern Japan, in subjects over 30 years of age. We then compared these results among non-participants and participants in cancer screening programs, and evaluated how any differences between the two groups might affect the results of case-control studies. Non-participants had a significantly lower intake of vegetables, carotene, vitamin C, and dietary fiber, which are thought to be beneficial factors in the prevention of carcinogenesis. Non-participants had a significantly higher cigarette smoking prevalence than participants. In relation to the intake of vegetables, a difference between participants and non-participants was evident, as proper adjustment for vegetable intake led to an odds ratio closer to the null value. The value of the odds ratio will probably not decrease, but it might increase when other dietary factors or smoking are taken into consideration.

AB - Evaluation of cancer screening using case-control studies is less valid in comparison to randomized controlled trails, due to the intrusion of a possible self-selection bias in the former. The randomized controlled trial approach, however, may be difficult in developed countries where mass cancer screening programs are already being performed nationally. Accordingly, case-control studies are often performed instead of randomized controlled trials. In case-control studies, no reports could be found in the literature using dietary habit, an important influencing factor in carcinogenesis, as an adjusting item. We surveyed nutrition and food intake status through a nutrition survey using the weighing method, and smoking prevalence and alcohol consumption with questionnaires in the general population in northern Japan, in subjects over 30 years of age. We then compared these results among non-participants and participants in cancer screening programs, and evaluated how any differences between the two groups might affect the results of case-control studies. Non-participants had a significantly lower intake of vegetables, carotene, vitamin C, and dietary fiber, which are thought to be beneficial factors in the prevention of carcinogenesis. Non-participants had a significantly higher cigarette smoking prevalence than participants. In relation to the intake of vegetables, a difference between participants and non-participants was evident, as proper adjustment for vegetable intake led to an odds ratio closer to the null value. The value of the odds ratio will probably not decrease, but it might increase when other dietary factors or smoking are taken into consideration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444273153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444273153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10654-004-0872-z

DO - 10.1007/s10654-004-0872-z

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15756907

AN - SCOPUS:13444273153

VL - 20

SP - 73

EP - 78

JO - European Journal of Epidemiology

JF - European Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0393-2990

IS - 1

ER -