TY - JOUR
T1 - Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator
AU - Yamaguchi, Shohei
AU - Konishi, Kozo
AU - Yasunaga, Takefumi
AU - Yoshida, Daisuke
AU - Kinjo, Nao
AU - Kobayashi, Kiichiro
AU - Ieiri, Satoshi
AU - Okazaki, Ken
AU - Nakashima, Hideaki
AU - Tanoue, Kazuo
AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko
AU - Hashizume, Makoto
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - Background: This study was carried out to investigate whether eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator (the LAP Mentor) was able to differentiate among subjects with different laparoscopic experience and thus confirm its construct validity. Methods: A total of 31 surgeons, who were all right-handed, were divided into the following two groups according to their experience as an operator in laparoscopic surgery: experienced surgeons (more than 50 laparoscopic procedures) and novice surgeons (fewer than 10 laparoscopic procedures). The subjects were tested using the eye-hand coordination task of the LAP Mentor, and performance was compared between the two groups. Assessment of the laparoscopic skills was based on parameters measured by the simulator. Results: The experienced surgeons completed the task significantly faster than the novice surgeons. The experienced surgeons also achieved a lower number of movements (NOM), better economy of movement (EOM) and faster average speed of the left instrument than the novice surgeons, whereas there were no significant differences between the two groups for the NOM, EOM and average speed of the right instrument. Conclusions: Eye-hand coordination skill of the nondominant hand, but not the dominant hand, measured using the LAP Mentor was able to differentiate between subjects with different laparoscopic experience. This study also provides evidence of construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on the LAP Mentor.
AB - Background: This study was carried out to investigate whether eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator (the LAP Mentor) was able to differentiate among subjects with different laparoscopic experience and thus confirm its construct validity. Methods: A total of 31 surgeons, who were all right-handed, were divided into the following two groups according to their experience as an operator in laparoscopic surgery: experienced surgeons (more than 50 laparoscopic procedures) and novice surgeons (fewer than 10 laparoscopic procedures). The subjects were tested using the eye-hand coordination task of the LAP Mentor, and performance was compared between the two groups. Assessment of the laparoscopic skills was based on parameters measured by the simulator. Results: The experienced surgeons completed the task significantly faster than the novice surgeons. The experienced surgeons also achieved a lower number of movements (NOM), better economy of movement (EOM) and faster average speed of the left instrument than the novice surgeons, whereas there were no significant differences between the two groups for the NOM, EOM and average speed of the right instrument. Conclusions: Eye-hand coordination skill of the nondominant hand, but not the dominant hand, measured using the LAP Mentor was able to differentiate between subjects with different laparoscopic experience. This study also provides evidence of construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on the LAP Mentor.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548613752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548613752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-007-9362-1
DO - 10.1007/s00464-007-9362-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 17479319
AN - SCOPUS:34548613752
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 21
SP - 2253
EP - 2257
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 12
ER -