Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates

Ian White, Chris Frost, Shoji Tokunaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurement error in exposures and confounders leads to bias in regression coefficients. It is possible to adjust for this bias if true values or independent replicates are observed on a subsample. We extend a method suitable for quantitative variables to the situation where both binary and quantitative variables are present. Binary variables with independent replicates introduce two extra problems: (i) the error is correlated with the true value, and (ii) the measurement error probabilities are unidentified if only two replicates are available. We show that - under plausible assumptions - adjustment for error in binary confounders does not need to address these problems. The regression coefficient for a binary exposure is overadjusted if methods for continuous variables are used. Correct adjustment is possible either if three replicates are available, or if further assumptions can be made; otherwise, bounds can be put on the correctly adjusted value, and these bounds are reasonably close together if the exposure has prevalence near 0.5.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3441-3457
Number of pages17
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume20
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 30 2001

Fingerprint

Binary Variables
Continuous Variables
Measurement Error
Regression Coefficient
Binary
Adjustment
Error Probability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates. / White, Ian; Frost, Chris; Tokunaga, Shoji.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 22, 30.11.2001, p. 3441-3457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Ian ; Frost, Chris ; Tokunaga, Shoji. / Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates. In: Statistics in Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 20, No. 22. pp. 3441-3457.
@article{2f8291bcd3084d0892b8ebaf55018c1b,
title = "Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates",
abstract = "Measurement error in exposures and confounders leads to bias in regression coefficients. It is possible to adjust for this bias if true values or independent replicates are observed on a subsample. We extend a method suitable for quantitative variables to the situation where both binary and quantitative variables are present. Binary variables with independent replicates introduce two extra problems: (i) the error is correlated with the true value, and (ii) the measurement error probabilities are unidentified if only two replicates are available. We show that - under plausible assumptions - adjustment for error in binary confounders does not need to address these problems. The regression coefficient for a binary exposure is overadjusted if methods for continuous variables are used. Correct adjustment is possible either if three replicates are available, or if further assumptions can be made; otherwise, bounds can be put on the correctly adjusted value, and these bounds are reasonably close together if the exposure has prevalence near 0.5.",
author = "Ian White and Chris Frost and Shoji Tokunaga",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/sim.908",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "3441--3457",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates

AU - White, Ian

AU - Frost, Chris

AU - Tokunaga, Shoji

PY - 2001/11/30

Y1 - 2001/11/30

N2 - Measurement error in exposures and confounders leads to bias in regression coefficients. It is possible to adjust for this bias if true values or independent replicates are observed on a subsample. We extend a method suitable for quantitative variables to the situation where both binary and quantitative variables are present. Binary variables with independent replicates introduce two extra problems: (i) the error is correlated with the true value, and (ii) the measurement error probabilities are unidentified if only two replicates are available. We show that - under plausible assumptions - adjustment for error in binary confounders does not need to address these problems. The regression coefficient for a binary exposure is overadjusted if methods for continuous variables are used. Correct adjustment is possible either if three replicates are available, or if further assumptions can be made; otherwise, bounds can be put on the correctly adjusted value, and these bounds are reasonably close together if the exposure has prevalence near 0.5.

AB - Measurement error in exposures and confounders leads to bias in regression coefficients. It is possible to adjust for this bias if true values or independent replicates are observed on a subsample. We extend a method suitable for quantitative variables to the situation where both binary and quantitative variables are present. Binary variables with independent replicates introduce two extra problems: (i) the error is correlated with the true value, and (ii) the measurement error probabilities are unidentified if only two replicates are available. We show that - under plausible assumptions - adjustment for error in binary confounders does not need to address these problems. The regression coefficient for a binary exposure is overadjusted if methods for continuous variables are used. Correct adjustment is possible either if three replicates are available, or if further assumptions can be made; otherwise, bounds can be put on the correctly adjusted value, and these bounds are reasonably close together if the exposure has prevalence near 0.5.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035976553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035976553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sim.908

DO - 10.1002/sim.908

M3 - Article

C2 - 11746328

AN - SCOPUS:0035976553

VL - 20

SP - 3441

EP - 3457

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 22

ER -