Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007)

D. Ueo, A. Utani, Yumi Okubo, M. Yozaki, Y. Mine, T. Anan, H. Nishida, D. Takahashi, T. Sakai, Y. Hatano, S. Fujiwara

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret: The error written on page 162 (line 6 from the top in the left column): “…13 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “…12 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 14 from the top in the left column): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1849 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” Sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1891 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 16 from the top in the right column): “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1849G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The error in the position of the mutation written on page 162 (line 5 from the bottom in the right column): “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1849G > T, in DNA⋯.” This sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, in DNA ….” The error written on page 163 (line 3 from the top in the left column): “The other eight mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “The other seven mutations in OSMRβ…” The corrected Fig. 1C,D and legend can be found below: Fig. 1. (C) A heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in the proband's OSMRβ. (D) Structural representation of OSMRβ, depicting the functional domains and locations of mutations. Twelve mutations have been described in OSMRβ.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Dermatological Science
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Missense Mutation
Mutation
Exons
Substitution reactions
DNA
corrigendum
Primary Cutaneous Amyloidosis
Emotions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007). / Ueo, D.; Utani, A.; Okubo, Yumi; Yozaki, M.; Mine, Y.; Anan, T.; Nishida, H.; Takahashi, D.; Sakai, T.; Hatano, Y.; Fujiwara, S.

In: Journal of Dermatological Science, Vol. 89, No. 1, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Ueo, D. ; Utani, A. ; Okubo, Yumi ; Yozaki, M. ; Mine, Y. ; Anan, T. ; Nishida, H. ; Takahashi, D. ; Sakai, T. ; Hatano, Y. ; Fujiwara, S. / Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007). In: Journal of Dermatological Science. 2018 ; Vol. 89, No. 1.
@article{985800bfa2904b95bb99db5b9fa4b00d,
title = "Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007)",
abstract = "The authors regret: The error written on page 162 (line 6 from the top in the left column): “…13 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “…12 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 14 from the top in the left column): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1849 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” Sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1891 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 16 from the top in the right column): “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1849G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The error in the position of the mutation written on page 162 (line 5 from the bottom in the right column): “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1849G > T, in DNA⋯.” This sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, in DNA ….” The error written on page 163 (line 3 from the top in the left column): “The other eight mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “The other seven mutations in OSMRβ…” The corrected Fig. 1C,D and legend can be found below: Fig. 1. (C) A heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in the proband's OSMRβ. (D) Structural representation of OSMRβ, depicting the functional domains and locations of mutations. Twelve mutations have been described in OSMRβ.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.",
author = "D. Ueo and A. Utani and Yumi Okubo and M. Yozaki and Y. Mine and T. Anan and H. Nishida and D. Takahashi and T. Sakai and Y. Hatano and S. Fujiwara",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
journal = "Journal of Dermatological Science",
issn = "0923-1811",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007)

AU - Ueo, D.

AU - Utani, A.

AU - Okubo, Yumi

AU - Yozaki, M.

AU - Mine, Y.

AU - Anan, T.

AU - Nishida, H.

AU - Takahashi, D.

AU - Sakai, T.

AU - Hatano, Y.

AU - Fujiwara, S.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The authors regret: The error written on page 162 (line 6 from the top in the left column): “…13 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “…12 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 14 from the top in the left column): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1849 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” Sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1891 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 16 from the top in the right column): “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1849G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The error in the position of the mutation written on page 162 (line 5 from the bottom in the right column): “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1849G > T, in DNA⋯.” This sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, in DNA ….” The error written on page 163 (line 3 from the top in the left column): “The other eight mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “The other seven mutations in OSMRβ…” The corrected Fig. 1C,D and legend can be found below: Fig. 1. (C) A heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in the proband's OSMRβ. (D) Structural representation of OSMRβ, depicting the functional domains and locations of mutations. Twelve mutations have been described in OSMRβ.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret: The error written on page 162 (line 6 from the top in the left column): “…13 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “…12 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 14 from the top in the left column): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1849 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” Sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1891 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 16 from the top in the right column): “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1849G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The error in the position of the mutation written on page 162 (line 5 from the bottom in the right column): “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1849G > T, in DNA⋯.” This sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, in DNA ….” The error written on page 163 (line 3 from the top in the left column): “The other eight mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “The other seven mutations in OSMRβ…” The corrected Fig. 1C,D and legend can be found below: Fig. 1. (C) A heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in the proband's OSMRβ. (D) Structural representation of OSMRβ, depicting the functional domains and locations of mutations. Twelve mutations have been described in OSMRβ.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035143429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035143429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.05.002

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85035143429

VL - 89

JO - Journal of Dermatological Science

JF - Journal of Dermatological Science

SN - 0923-1811

IS - 1

ER -