Corrigendum to “Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in a Japanese family” [J. Dermatol. Sci. 83 (2016) 162–164](S0923181116300779)(10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.007)

The authors regret: The error written on page 162 (line 6 from the top in the left column): “…13 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “…12 heterozygous missense mutations in OSMRβ…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 14 from the top in the left column): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1849 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” Sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation): “…in whom a heterozygous c.1891 G > T missense mutation in OSMRβ caused a p. V631L substitution…” The error in the position of the mutation described on page 162 (line 16 from the top in the right column): “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1849G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “…missense mutation in OSMRβnamely, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in exon…” The error in the position of the mutation written on page 162 (line 5 from the bottom in the right column): “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1849G > T, in DNA⋯.” This sentence should be read (corrected position of mutation) “We found a heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, in DNA ….” The error written on page 163 (line 3 from the top in the left column): “The other eight mutations in OSMRβ…” Sentence should be corrected “The other seven mutations in OSMRβ…” The corrected Fig. 1C,D and legend can be found below: Fig. 1. (C) A heterozygous missense mutation, c.1891G > T, p.V631L, in the proband's OSMRβ. (D) Structural representation of OSMRβ, depicting the functional domains and locations of mutations. Twelve mutations have been described in OSMRβ.” The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.